Enterprise software is not a monolith — two companies operating in the same broad sector can offer vastly different risk-reward profiles. ADP (Automatic Data Processing, Inc.) and MANH (Manhattan Associates, Inc.) exemplify this divergence. ADP is a dividend-paying stalwart dominating payroll and HR cloud services, while Manhattan Associates is a fast-moving player in supply chain and omnichannel commerce software. For investors weighing stability against growth potential, or income against capital appreciation, this comparison examines how these two names stack up across recent performance, business fundamentals, and market positioning — offering a data-driven lens through which to assess relative attractiveness.
Automatic Data Processing is one of the world's largest providers of cloud-based human capital management (HCM) solutions, serving businesses of all sizes through platforms such as ADP Workforce Now, RUN Powered by ADP, and ADP Lyric. The company operates through two primary segments: Employer Services and Professional Employer Organization (PEO) services. With a market capitalization of approximately $102 billion and trailing 12-month revenue exceeding $21.6 billion, ADP is a blue-chip enterprise deeply embedded in the global payroll and HR infrastructure.
In recent weeks, ADP shares have staged a notable recovery — gaining roughly 16.7% over the past month — after a period of underperformance that saw the stock decline approximately 13% year-over-year. The company's most recent quarterly results surpassed analyst expectations, with earnings per share (EPS) of $2.49 beating the consensus estimate of $2.44, and revenue of $5.2 billion topping the forecast of $5.14 billion. Despite these operational beats, several Wall Street firms have trimmed their price targets, citing a mixed macroeconomic outlook and concerns about organic growth deceleration. ADP's 0.84 beta and 2% dividend yield — backed by over five decades of consecutive dividend increases — continue to anchor the stock as a defensive holding within the technology sector.
Manhattan Associates develops, sells, and maintains software solutions that manage supply chains, inventory, and omnichannel operations for enterprises worldwide. Its flagship offerings include Manhattan Active Warehouse Management — a cloud-native, versionless application — and Manhattan Active Omni, which unifies point-of-sale, order management, and customer engagement. The company has been undergoing a deliberate transition from legacy license revenue toward recurring cloud subscription revenue, a shift that has reshaped its financial profile and growth trajectory.
With a market capitalization around $9.7 billion and trailing 12-month revenue of approximately $1.1 billion, MANH is considerably smaller than ADP but has demonstrated faster cloud revenue expansion — with cloud subscription revenue growing approximately 22% year-over-year in recent quarters. The stock has surged roughly 23.5% over the past month, significantly outpacing ADP's gain over the same window. Manhattan Associates' remaining performance obligation (RPO) recently surpassed the $2 billion milestone, signaling strong future revenue visibility. However, the stock remains down roughly 20% over the past year, and with a trailing P/E ratio near 46 — compared to ADP's 24 — MANH commands a premium that reflects growth expectations but also entails greater valuation sensitivity. Notably, short interest sits at approximately 6.3% of the float, indicating a meaningful degree of skepticism among some market participants.
In a market environment where speed and data-driven discipline can significantly influence outcomes, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's strongest-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the most robust alignment with current market conditions earn a spot in this featured section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — ranging from 5-minute scalping strategies to multi-day swing trading — and span varied timeframes, risk profiles, and sector concentrations. Top-performing bots have delivered annualized returns exceeding 85% in select categories, with win rates ranging from approximately 57% to 68% and profit factors surpassing 2.0 across numerous strategies. Each bot is powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs), which continuously adapt to evolving price action and volatility patterns. For traders and investors seeking to complement their own analysis with AI-driven signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots section may reveal actionable opportunities across a wide spectrum of tickers and market conditions.
The contrast between ADP and MANH is sharpest when viewed through the lens of business maturity and growth dynamics. ADP operates at formidable scale — its $21.6 billion revenue base is nearly 20 times larger than MANH's — and generates consistent profitability with an operating margin near 30%. The company's deeply entrenched client relationships create high switching costs, a durable competitive moat that translates into predictable cash flows and reliable dividend growth. Yet this maturity also caps top-line expansion, with revenue growth in the 6–7% range, and makes the stock more sensitive to employment cycle fluctuations — when businesses slow hiring, ADP's payroll processing volumes can feel the effects.
MANH, by contrast, operates in the structurally faster-growing supply chain software market, where the secular tailwinds of e-commerce expansion, warehouse automation, and cloud migration continue to drive demand. The company's transition toward a recurring cloud revenue model — with cloud subscriptions now contributing meaningfully to total revenue — enhances earnings visibility and margin potential over time. However, the stock's elevated valuation multiples (price-to-sales of roughly 9x vs. ADP's 4.8x) leave less room for execution missteps, and the company's relatively concentrated product portfolio means it faces focused competitive pressure from larger enterprise software rivals. MANH also carries no dividend, making it a pure capital-appreciation play compared to ADP's total-return orientation.
From a sector exposure standpoint, ADP is levered to the health of the labor market and corporate HR spending, while MANH is tied to logistics, retail fulfillment, and global trade flows. In the current environment — where cloud transformation and supply chain modernization remain boardroom priorities — MANH arguably sits closer to the spending trends driving enterprise software budgets, though ADP's defensive characteristics may appeal when macroeconomic uncertainty rises.
Based on observable factors such as recent momentum, trend consistency, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely express a near-term preference for MANH over ADP. The rationale centers on MANH's stronger short-term price momentum — rising over 23% in the past month versus ADP's 16.7% — combined with accelerating cloud revenue growth and a growing RPO backlog that provides forward revenue visibility. MANH's higher beta and the elevated short interest may also create conditions where positive catalysts — such as continued earnings outperformance or upward estimate revisions — can trigger outsized price responses. ADP, meanwhile, presents a more stable but slower-moving profile, and the recent pattern of analyst price-target reductions, despite operational beats, suggests the market is already pricing in much of the company's steady-state strength. This assessment is probabilistic rather than predictive: ADP's defensive attributes and dividend reliability remain compelling for risk-averse portfolios, but the current trend and catalyst profile tilts the AI's near-term edge toward Manhattan Associates.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMANH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MANH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while MANH (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.55% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.09%.
ADP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ADP | MANH | ADP / MANH | |
| Capitalization | 102B | 9.79B | 1,041% |
| EBITDA | 6.7B | 288M | 2,326% |
| Gain YTD | 0.805 | -4.501 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.81 | 46.37 | 51% |
| Revenue | 21.6B | 1.1B | 1,962% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 226M | - |
| Total Debt | 4.3B | 55.7M | 7,711% |
ADP | MANH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADP's Valuation (10) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for MANH (86) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew significantly faster than MANH’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MANH (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADP (16) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to ADP’s over the last 12 months.
ADP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as MANH (44) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADP’s stock grew similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADP (75) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that MANH’s stock grew similarly to ADP’s over the last 12 months.
| ADP | MANH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADP has been closely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADP jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADP | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| PAYX - ADP | 86% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| PCTY - ADP | 73% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| PAYC - ADP | 67% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| SSNC - ADP | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| MANH - ADP | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MANH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | 100% | +1.42% | ||
| WDAY - MANH | 66% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| DT - MANH | 66% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PCTY - MANH | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| INTA - MANH | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| PAYX - MANH | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||