Investors seeking exposure to the regulated utility sector often weigh AEE and ED as two compelling yet fundamentally distinct options. Ameren Corporation serves customers across Missouri and Illinois, while Consolidated Edison operates in one of the densest and most economically vital energy markets in the world — New York City and its surrounding region. This stock comparison examines how these two utility giants stack up across dimensions including growth trajectory, regulatory environment, market positioning, and recent performance. For income-oriented investors evaluating defensive equities, or traders monitoring relative strength within the utilities sector, understanding the contrasts between these two companies can clarify which profile aligns better with current market conditions.
AEE, or Ameren Corporation, is a St. Louis-based public utility holding company engaged in rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution, as well as natural gas transmission and distribution. The company operates through four primary segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Transmission, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, and Ameren Illinois Natural Gas. In recent market activity, AEE has demonstrated resilience within a broader environment of elevated interest rates. The stock has traded in a 52-week range of approximately $96.57 to $118.32, with a current price near $110.42 and a market capitalization of roughly $30.9 billion. Its beta of 0.48 underscores its low-volatility, defensive profile.
In recent weeks, AEE shares have experienced moderate downward pressure alongside the broader utility sector, though the company's fundamentals remain underpinned by a significant capital investment pipeline. Ameren has reported strong year-over-year adjusted earnings growth driven by infrastructure investments, new electric service rates at Ameren Missouri effective mid-2025, and higher retail sales. The company has also expanded data center construction agreements to 3 gigawatts, positioning it to benefit from growing electricity demand from AI and cloud computing infrastructure, though the ramp-up for these projects has been pushed to 2027. Ameren's long-term growth guidance of 6% to 8% EPS CAGR through 2030, supported by $31.8 billion in planned infrastructure investments, continues to anchor the investment thesis.
ED, Consolidated Edison, Inc., is a holding company whose principal subsidiary — Consolidated Edison Company of New York (CECONY) — delivers electric, gas, and steam service to millions of customers in New York City and Westchester County. Through Orange and Rockland Utilities and Con Edison Transmission, the company also serves southeastern New York, northern New Jersey, and invests in electric transmission projects. ED's franchise territory encompasses one of the world's most concentrated economic hubs, providing a durable demand base that few utilities can match.
In recent quarters, ED has delivered adjusted EPS at the top end of its guidance range, with full-year 2025 adjusted earnings of $5.70 per share. The company has introduced 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $6.00 to $6.20 and a five-year adjusted EPS growth target of 6% to 7%. The recently approved three-year rate plan in New York, which includes an increase in the authorized ROE (return on equity), provides regulatory clarity for near-term infrastructure spending. ED plans to invest $38 billion in capital projects from 2026 through 2030, including 14 new substations and significant grid modernization. However, analyst sentiment has been mixed, with Barclays maintaining an Underweight rating and others taking a more neutral stance, reflecting caution around the pace of cost recovery and the dilutive impact of planned equity issuance.
For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like AEE and ED, Tickeron offers a dedicated Trending AI Robots page that curates the most compelling AI-powered trading bots from a universe of hundreds. These bots trade thousands of different tickers and cover a wide spectrum of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. The bots featured in this curated section are selected because they have demonstrated an ability to adapt to current market conditions — with some showcasing annualized returns exceeding 20% and win rates above 60%, depending on the strategy and timeframe employed. Each bot operates with its own distinct approach, whether focused on momentum, trend following, mean reversion, or breakout patterns. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help users identify which automated strategies are currently aligned with real-time market dynamics across the utility sector and beyond.
When comparing AEE and ED, several structural contrasts emerge. Ameren's rate base growth of approximately 10.6% compounded annually outpaces Con Edison's projected rate base expansion, reflecting AEE's more aggressive infrastructure build-out across transmission and generation assets. This higher growth trajectory comes with greater regulatory dependency across two state jurisdictions — Missouri and Illinois — each with distinct political and rate-setting dynamics.
Con Edison, in contrast, operates primarily under a single, large regulatory framework in New York, which has historically provided predictable outcomes but also imposes stringent climate mandates and affordability constraints. ED's customer base is denser and wealthier on average, but its cost structure — including some of the highest operations and maintenance expenses among U.S. utilities — can pressure margins if rate relief lags. AEE benefits from a more diversified generation mix including nuclear, coal, natural gas, and renewables, whereas ED is predominantly a transmission and distribution (T&D) utility after divesting its Clean Energy Businesses in 2023.
On valuation, ED's trailing P/E of approximately 17.3 is below both the peer average of roughly 19.2 and AEE's approximately 19.9, suggesting the market is pricing ED more conservatively relative to its earnings. AEE's premium multiple reflects confidence in its higher rate base growth, though it also means less room for error should regulatory outcomes disappoint. Both companies offer reliable dividends — ED's 52-year streak of annual increases is among the longest in corporate America, while AEE's yield of roughly 2.69% provides competitive income. From a risk perspective, AEE faces concentrated exposure to Midcontinent weather patterns and Midwest regulatory bodies, while ED's risk profile centers on coastal storm vulnerability and New York's ambitious decarbonization timeline.
Based on observable trend consistency, growth trajectory, and relative positioning within the current market environment, Tickeron's AI analysis would likely exhibit a modest preference for AEE over ED at this juncture. The reasoning is multifaceted: Ameren's stronger rate base growth, the emerging data center demand catalyst, and a cleaner technical picture with sustained positive year-to-date momentum all contribute to this assessment. While Con Edison's entrenched New York City franchise and unmatched dividend longevity offer undeniable defensive appeal, the cautious analyst posture and the headwinds of aggressive New York climate policy create a more mixed near-term outlook. The AI's preference would be probabilistic rather than definitive — recognizing that ED's valuation discount could attract value-oriented capital at any time. In a market rewarding growth within the utility space, AEE's higher expansion velocity and diversified generation portfolio appear to offer a slight relative advantage according to the observable data.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ED’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEE (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while ED (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.38%.
AEE is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| AEE | ED | AEE / ED | |
| Capitalization | 31.3B | 41.6B | 75% |
| EBITDA | 4.17B | 6.35B | 66% |
| Gain YTD | 15.004 | 15.412 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.37 | 19.02 | 107% |
| Revenue | 8.88B | 17.2B | 52% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 147M | - |
| Total Debt | 21.3B | 27.2B | 78% |
AEE | ED | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 37 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AEE (64). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to AEE’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AEE (27). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to AEE’s over the last 12 months.
AEE's SMR Rating (66) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (77). This means that AEE’s stock grew similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
ED's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AEE (36). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to AEE’s over the last 12 months.
ED's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as AEE (56). This means that ED’s stock grew similarly to AEE’s over the last 12 months.
| AEE | ED | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 36% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 47% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.