Advertisement
AEM vs RGLD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and RGLD is a Hold.
AEM in downward trend: 10-day moving average moved below 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026
The 10-day moving average for AEM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 44 of 67 cases where AEM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
AEM moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AEM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Aroon Indicator for AEM entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AEM as a result. In 59 of 73 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AEM just turned positive on October 16, 2026. Looking at past instances where AEM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 45 of 55 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Following a +7.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AEM advanced for three days, in 252 of 325 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
AEM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 44 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. AEM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.259) is normal, around the industry mean (3.888). P/E Ratio (15.766) is within average values for comparable stocks, (46.261). AEM's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (30.116) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.009) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (6.766) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
RGLD in +5.88% Uptrend, advancing for three consecutive days on October 16, 2026
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where RGLD advanced for three days, in 268 of 373 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where RGLD's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 37 of 54 cases where RGLD's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RGLD as a result. In 52 of 77 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
The 50-day moving average for RGLD moved above the 200-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
RGLD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
RGLD moved below its 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for RGLD crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 06, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RGLD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
The Aroon Indicator for RGLD entered a downward trend on October 14, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 26 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.684) is normal, around the industry mean (3.888). P/E Ratio (26.614) is within average values for comparable stocks, (46.261). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.480) is also within normal values, averaging (2.614). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.009) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (12.563) is also within normal values, averaging (7.321).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 62, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RGLD’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
AEM | RGLD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLD's Valuation (26) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (95) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (39) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (60) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLD (45) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to RGLD’s over the last 12 months.
RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (87) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | RGLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 68% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while RGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLD’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RGLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while RGLD (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
RGLD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-4.34% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
Advertisement