AFRM
Price
$77.03
Change
+$1.98 (+2.64%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
25.8B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAYO
Price
$7.11
Change
+$0.02 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.41B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFRM vs PAYO

AFRM vs PAYO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. PAYO commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and PAYO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (AFRM: $77.03 vs. PAYO: $7.11)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and PAYO are both not notable
AFRM represents the Savings Banks, while PAYO is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 54% vs. PAYO: 16%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $25.8B vs. PAYO: $2.41B
AFRM [@Savings Banks] is valued at $25.8B. PAYO’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $698.09B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.59T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $35.05B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $33.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAYO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAYO is a better buy in the long-term than AFRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAYO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the short-term than PAYO.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Savings Banks) experienced а -1.68% price change this week, while PAYO (@Computer Communications) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

PAYO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.71% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

@Computer Communications (-1.71% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($25.8B) has a higher market cap than PAYO($2.41B). AFRM has higher P/E ratio than PAYO: AFRM (70.03) vs PAYO (50.79). PAYO YTD gains are higher at: 26.512 vs. AFRM (3.493). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. PAYO (196M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. PAYO (339M). PAYO has less debt than AFRM: PAYO (80M) vs AFRM (9.09B). AFRM has higher revenues than PAYO: AFRM (3.97B) vs PAYO (843M).
AFRMPAYOAFRM / PAYO
Capitalization25.8B2.41B1,071%
EBITDA1.12B196M570%
Gain YTD3.49326.51213%
P/E Ratio70.0350.79138%
Revenue3.97B843M471%
Total Cash2.48B339M732%
Total Debt9.09B80M11,364%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMPAYO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAYO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URNM58.194.14
+7.66%
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
AMDW81.020.87
+1.09%
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
CLCG28.790.13
+0.47%
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF
DOCT47.560.05
+0.11%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct
TRPA39.00-0.01
-0.03%
Hartford AAA CLO ETF

PAYO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYO has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYO jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYO
1D Price
Change %
PAYO100%
+0.28%
SHOP - PAYO
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
COIN - PAYO
50%
Loosely correlated
+8.20%
DT - PAYO
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
AI - PAYO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
AFRM - PAYO
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.64%
More