Investors searching for income-generating stocks face a diverse landscape of financial institutions, each with distinct business models, risk exposures, and return profiles. This comparison examines two notable names: AGM, the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation—better known as Farmer Mac—and BBDC, Barings BDC, Inc. While both operate within the broader credit ecosystem and deliver dividend income to shareholders, their underlying strategies and recent performance trajectories diverge significantly. Farmer Mac provides vital liquidity to American agriculture and rural infrastructure through a secondary market framework, whereas Barings BDC focuses on originating senior secured loans to middle-market companies. For income-oriented and value-conscious investors weighing competing opportunities, understanding how these two names compare across growth, yield, and risk dimensions is essential.
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM), commonly called Farmer Mac, is a federally chartered, stockholder-owned corporation that serves as the nation's secondary market provider for agricultural and rural infrastructure loans. Its business spans segments including Farm & Ranch, Corporate AgFinance, Rural Utilities, Broadband Infrastructure, and Renewable Energy. The company has experienced notable price appreciation in recent months, with shares trading near $214 in late July and posting a one-year return exceeding 25%. This momentum has been underpinned by record operating results: Farmer Mac reported full-year 2025 core earnings of $182.9 million, or $16.66 per diluted share, representing 7% year-over-year growth, and outstanding business volume reached $33.4 billion—a 13% increase from the prior year. The company's renewable energy portfolio more than doubled to $2.3 billion, and broadband infrastructure financing doubled year-over-year, reflecting strategic diversification beyond traditional agricultural lending. In early 2026, Farmer Mac's Board raised the quarterly common stock dividend by 7% to $1.60 per share, marking the fifteenth consecutive annual increase. With a Tier 1 Capital Ratio (a measure of a bank's core equity capital relative to its risk-weighted assets) of 13.3% and total core capital of $1.7 billion—exceeding statutory requirements by a wide margin—AGM's financial foundation appears solid.
Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) is an externally managed business development company (BDC)—a type of closed-end investment firm that provides capital to small and mid-sized businesses—operating within the $456 billion-plus Barings asset management platform. The company originates and manages a diversified portfolio of predominantly senior secured, floating-rate loans to middle-market borrowers across a broad range of industries. As of late July 2026, BBDC shares traded near $8.30, reflecting a year-to-date decline of approximately 4% and a roughly flat one-year total return. The stock's current price sits at a notable discount to its NAV per share (the per-share value of the company's total assets minus liabilities) of $11.09, implying a price-to-book ratio of approximately 0.75x—a level that typically signals market caution. For full-year 2025, BBDC reported net investment income (NII, or income generated from the portfolio after operating expenses) of $1.12 per share and declared $1.04 in regular dividends plus $0.15 in special dividends, demonstrating full dividend coverage from earnings. Portfolio credit quality remains a standout strength: non-accruals—loans on which borrowers have stopped making payments—represented only 0.2% of the portfolio's fair value as of year-end 2025, an industry-leading metric. The weighted-average yield on performing debt investments has compressed modestly from 10.2% to 9.5% over the past year, reflecting the broader decline in floating-rate benchmarks, which represents a headwind for future NII generation.
Navigating today's complex markets demands more than just human intuition—it requires data-driven precision. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to identify opportunities across thousands of tickers under evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Among them, traders can find bots that have delivered annualized returns in the range of 15% to over 40%, depending on the strategy employed. Only those bots demonstrating consistent alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in the Trending section, making it a valuable discovery tool for traders seeking systematic, algorithm-driven approaches. Whether your focus is on dividend stocks, momentum plays, or volatility-based setups, exploring the Trending AI Robots may reveal strategies worth further investigation.
Comparing AGM and BBDC reveals two fundamentally different approaches to credit investing. AGM operates as a government-sponsored enterprise with a public-policy mandate, granting it structural advantages such as implicit federal backing and access to low-cost funding through agency debt markets. Its business is tied to the health of the U.S. agricultural economy and rural infrastructure spending, which have benefited from secular tailwinds in renewable energy and broadband expansion. BBDC, by contrast, is a private-sector BDC whose fortunes are more closely tied to corporate credit cycles, middle-market M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, and the trajectory of short-term interest rates. With 92% of its portfolio in floating-rate instruments, BBDC's income is sensitive to changes in benchmark rates—a double-edged sword that boosted earnings during the tightening cycle but now presents headwinds as rates plateau or decline.
On valuation, the contrast is striking: AGM trades at approximately 11.9 times trailing earnings with a dividend yield of roughly 3%, while BBDC trades at roughly 10.2 times earnings with a yield near 12%. The divergence in yields reflects market perceptions of risk and growth durability. AGM's total return profile has been powered by both earnings growth and multiple expansion, while BBDC's return has relied almost entirely on its dividend, with price appreciation proving elusive. For income-focused investors, BBDC's yield is undeniably attractive, but the persistent discount to NAV raises questions about whether the market perceives structural headwinds or portfolio risks that have yet to materialize in credit metrics. Meanwhile, AGM's lower yield is coupled with a track record of consistent dividend growth, appealing to investors prioritizing income growth over current yield.
Based on observable market data and trend signals, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely express a stronger conviction toward AGM in the current environment. The stock's consistent upward price trajectory, record operational performance, expanding business volume, and multi-year track record of dividend increases point to a well-defined positive trend with tangible fundamental support. AGM's recent breakout toward the upper end of its 52-week range—combined with analyst upgrades and strong institutional inflows—suggests trend-following algorithms would find alignment with the prevailing momentum. While BBDC offers a significantly higher dividend yield and pristine credit quality, its price action has been range-bound and modestly negative on a year-to-date basis, and the compression in portfolio yields represents a near-term earnings headwind that may weigh on algorithmic assessments of trend consistency. That said, BBDC's deep discount to NAV and low non-accrual rate could attract value-oriented and mean-reversion strategies under different market regimes. In probabilistic terms, the balance of observable trend factors and relative strength metrics currently appears to favor AGM for capital appreciation potential, while BBDC may appeal more directly to pure-income strategies willing to accept price stagnation in exchange for double-digit yields.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBBDC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBDC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGM (@Savings Banks) experienced а +8.63% price change this week, while BBDC (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.92%.
AGM is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
BBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
@Investment Managers (+0.71% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| AGM | BBDC | AGM / BBDC | |
| Capitalization | 2.36B | 864M | 273% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.180 | -4.484 | -718% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.45 | 9.71 | 128% |
| Revenue | 446M | 102M | 437% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 79.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 36.9B | 1.41B | 2,610% |
AGM | BBDC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBDC's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGM (71) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than AGM’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (50) in the null industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's SMR Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBDC (69) in the null industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBDC’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (59) in the null industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.
AGM's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BBDC (50) in the null industry. This means that AGM’s stock grew similarly to BBDC’s over the last 12 months.
| AGM | BBDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 39% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 35% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TDAQ | 26.20 | 0.14 | +0.54% |
| TappAlpha Innovation 100 Gr & Dl Inc ETF | |||
| PDBA | 36.73 | 0.05 | +0.14% |
| Invesco Agriculture Cmdty Str No K-1ETF | |||
| MINN | 21.92 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| NHYM | 24.66 | -0.05 | -0.18% |
| Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF | |||
| RWR | 115.94 | -0.46 | -0.40% |
| State Street® SPDR® Dow Jones® REIT ETF | |||