It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AHL (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +0.03% price change this week, while PGR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.58%.
PGR is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| AHL | PGR | AHL / PGR | |
| Capitalization | 3.38B | 131B | 3% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | N/A | -5.061 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 5.41 | 12.24 | 44% |
| Revenue | 3.16B | 82.4B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 6.21B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 367M | 6.9B | 5% |
AHL | PGR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHL's Valuation (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PGR (85). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to PGR’s over the last 12 months.
PGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHL (100). This means that PGR’s stock grew significantly faster than AHL’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's SMR Rating (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PGR (78). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to PGR’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PGR (62). This means that AHL’s stock grew similarly to PGR’s over the last 12 months.
AHL's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGR (83). This means that AHL’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGR’s over the last 12 months.
| AHL | PGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 7 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 32% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFND | 23.58 | 0.08 | +0.32% |
| Unlimited HFND Multi-Strgy Ret Trckr ETF | |||
| ENX | 10.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance New York Municipal | |||
| AUSF | 44.67 | -0.09 | -0.20% |
| Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF | |||
| GENW | 12.51 | -0.08 | -0.65% |
| Genter Capital International Div ETF | |||
| COWZ | 57.75 | -0.43 | -0.74% |
| Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHL and HIPO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHL and HIPO's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGR has been closely correlated with ALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGR jumps, then ALL could also see price increases.