Advertisement
CULP vs PASW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CULP is a Buy and PASW is a Hold.
CULP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CULP | PASW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CULP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while PASW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CULP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PASW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CULP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PASW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CULP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PASW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CULP (@Textiles) experienced а -1.93% price change this week, while PASW (@Textiles) price change was -8.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was +19.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
CULP is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Textiles (+19.30% weekly)The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
Advertisement
CULP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CULP and UFI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULP and UFI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CULP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULP | 100% | +5.06% | ||
| UFI - CULP | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| AIN - CULP | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
| PASW - CULP | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.34% |
PASW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PASW and UFI have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PASW and UFI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PASW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PASW | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| UFI - PASW | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| CULP - PASW | 8% Poorly correlated | +5.06% | ||
| AIN - PASW | -4% Poorly correlated | -1.48% |