ALRM
Price
$43.41
Change
-$0.28 (-0.64%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:02 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.16B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$9.18
Change
+$0.25 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.47B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALRM vs FRSH

ALRM vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALRM vs. FRSH commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALRM is a StrongBuy and FRSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ALRM: $43.71 vs. FRSH: $8.93)
Brand notoriety: ALRM and FRSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALRM: 129% vs. FRSH: 249%
Market capitalization -- ALRM: $2.16B vs. FRSH: $2.47B
ALRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.16B. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than ALRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALRM is a better buy in the short-term than FRSH.

Price Growth

ALRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.87% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALRM is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSH($2.47B) has a higher market cap than ALRM($2.16B). ALRM has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: ALRM (18.14) vs FRSH (14.54). ALRM YTD gains are higher at: -14.328 vs. FRSH (-27.102). ALRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 225M vs. FRSH (42.9M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 779M vs. ALRM (497M). FRSH has less debt than ALRM: FRSH (38.8M) vs ALRM (567M). ALRM has higher revenues than FRSH: ALRM (1.04B) vs FRSH (871M).
ALRMFRSHALRM / FRSH
Capitalization2.16B2.47B88%
EBITDA225M42.9M524%
Gain YTD-14.328-27.10253%
P/E Ratio18.1414.54125%
Revenue1.04B871M119%
Total Cash497M779M64%
Total Debt567M38.8M1,461%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALRM vs FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
ALRM
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10092
SMR RATING
1..100
5551
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ALRM (71) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ALRM’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ALRM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ALRM’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as ALRM (55) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to ALRM’s over the last 12 months.

ALRM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (62) in the Restaurants industry. This means that ALRM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALRM (75) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALRMFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASHR37.300.96
+2.64%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
QCJA23.32N/A
N/A
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Cnsrv Buffr ETF - Jan
HYUP41.70-0.04
-0.09%
Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF
DINT29.17-0.06
-0.20%
Davis Select International ETF
PCHI24.47-0.18
-0.74%
Polen High Income ETF

ALRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALRM has been loosely correlated with SPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALRM jumps, then SPT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALRM
1D Price
Change %
ALRM100%
-1.51%
SPT - ALRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
CLSK - ALRM
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
CPAY - ALRM
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
FIVN - ALRM
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.89%
FRSH - ALRM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More