This comparison examines DocuSign (DOCU) and Freshworks (FRSH), two software companies with distinct yet overlapping exposures to digital transformation trends. DocuSign specializes in electronic signature and agreement lifecycle management, while Freshworks provides cloud-based customer and employee experience solutions. The analysis targets institutional and retail investors seeking objective insights into relative performance, business model differences, and recent momentum in the current market environment. Traders evaluating growth-oriented software names may find the side-by-side review useful for assessing positioning amid evolving AI adoption and macroeconomic conditions.
DocuSign, Inc. provides electronic signature and agreement management solutions to enterprises worldwide. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected positive investor response to fourth-quarter fiscal 2026 results, including revenue of $836.9 million (up 8% year-over-year) and a non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $1.01 that exceeded consensus. The company expanded its Intelligent Agreement Management (IAM) platform with new AI features and announced a $2.0 billion increase to its share repurchase authorization. Stock behavior showed resilience, with reports indicating approximately 7.7% gains over the past month despite broader industry pressures. Sentiment has been supported by operational leverage and platform traction, though tempered by modest top-line acceleration relative to historical periods. Upcoming first-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings, scheduled for early June 2026, remain a near-term focus.
Freshworks, Inc. offers cloud-based software for customer support, sales, and employee experience. Recent market activity highlights a solid first-quarter calendar 2026 earnings release, with revenue reaching $228.6 million (up 16.5% year-over-year) and a beat on both top-line and non-GAAP operating income expectations. The company raised full-year revenue guidance slightly and reported strong free cash flow of $55.8 million. Performance was influenced by expansion in its Employee Experience segment (up 27% year-over-year) and the completion of the FireHydrant acquisition. Freshworks also announced an 11% workforce reduction expected to generate cost savings. Shares traded near $9 following the results, with mixed daily movements but positive after-hours reaction initially. Broader sentiment reflects appreciation for growth execution offset by ongoing GAAP losses and restructuring charges.
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section on its platform, featuring hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are highlighted in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical statistics often showing win rates between 55% and 75% and varying drawdown profiles depending on the specific robot. Users can review detailed backtested and live performance data to identify bots aligned with their risk tolerance and objectives. Explore the full selection at the Trending AI Robots page for additional insights.
DocuSign (DOCU) and Freshworks (FRSH) differ markedly in scale and focus. DocuSign operates in the mature electronic signature and contract management space with a larger installed base and emphasis on AI-enhanced IAM capabilities, supporting steadier but lower double-digit revenue growth. Freshworks pursues higher-growth opportunities in customer and employee experience software, delivering faster revenue expansion (16.5% versus 8%) alongside robust free cash flow. Risk factors include DocuSign’s exposure to cyclical enterprise spending and competition in document workflows, contrasted with Freshworks’ smaller size, ongoing path to sustained GAAP profitability, and recent restructuring. Sector exposure overlaps in cloud software, yet DocuSign benefits from brand recognition in compliance-heavy industries while Freshworks targets broader mid-market adoption. Recent momentum favors Freshworks on growth metrics, while DocuSign shows stability through capital return initiatives.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent earnings delivery, relative growth positioning, and catalyst visibility, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to Freshworks (FRSH) in the near term due to stronger revenue momentum and free cash flow generation. DocuSign (DOCU) remains competitive on stability and shareholder returns. This assessment reflects current data patterns rather than forward guarantees and should not be interpreted as investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DOCU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DOCU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DOCU (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.72% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.18%.
DOCU is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| DOCU | FRSH | DOCU / FRSH | |
| Capitalization | 8.6B | 2.61B | 329% |
| EBITDA | 512M | 42.9M | 1,193% |
| Gain YTD | -34.167 | -22.898 | 149% |
| P/E Ratio | 29.24 | 15.37 | 190% |
| Revenue | 3.29B | 871M | 377% |
| Total Cash | 814M | 779M | 104% |
| Total Debt | 183M | 38.8M | 472% |
DOCU | FRSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 15 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DOCU (66) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DOCU (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DOCU (53) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DOCU (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to DOCU’s over the last 12 months.
DOCU's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (27) in the Restaurants industry. This means that DOCU’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
| DOCU | FRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 69% | 15 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DOCU has been closely correlated with BRZE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DOCU jumps, then BRZE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DOCU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOCU | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| BRZE - DOCU | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HUBS - DOCU | 70% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| FRSH - DOCU | 70% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| CRM - DOCU | 68% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| WDAY - DOCU | 67% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
More | ||||