CRM
Price
$233.28
Change
-$3.14 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
195.81B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$12.42
Change
-$0.03 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.2B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRM vs FRSH

CRM vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 21, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. Freshworks (FRSH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Salesforce (CRM) maintains a dominant position in enterprise customer relationship management (CRM) software with a market capitalization exceeding $195 billion, while Freshworks (FRSH) operates as a smaller player focused on mid-market and smaller enterprises with a market cap near $3 billion.
  • Recent market activity shows CRM experiencing volatility with a 3-month gain near 58% but a modest 1-year decline, contrasted by FRSH's narrower trading range and recent pressure from forward guidance.
  • Both companies emphasize artificial intelligence (AI) integration in their platforms, though CRM's scale supports broader Agentforce initiatives and consistent free cash flow generation.
  • FRSH demonstrates improving profitability metrics and revenue growth around 15% year-over-year, positioning it as a nimbler alternative in the SaaS (Software as a Service) space.
  • Sector exposure differs notably, with CRM tied to large enterprise digital transformation and FRSH benefiting from accessible pricing models appealing to growing businesses.
  • Market sentiment reflects caution in software valuations overall, influencing relative performance amid broader technology sector fluctuations in recent weeks.

Introduction

This comparison examines Salesforce (CRM) and Freshworks (FRSH), two publicly traded companies in the application software sector that provide customer relationship management solutions. The analysis focuses on business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities. Institutional participants, growth-oriented equity traders, and those monitoring SaaS valuations may find the contrast between a large-cap leader and a smaller, agile competitor particularly relevant in the current environment of AI-driven innovation and selective capital allocation.

CRM Overview and Recent Performance

Salesforce (CRM) delivers enterprise cloud computing solutions centered on sales, service, marketing, and commerce applications. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience amid AI-focused developments, including expansions of its Agentforce platform and participation in flagship events such as Dreamforce. Performance over recent weeks reflects mixed signals, with notable gains in the prior three months offset by shorter-term pullbacks tied to broader software sector sentiment and macroeconomic factors. The company's emphasis on accelerated share repurchases and emerging dividend payments has supported investor engagement, while revenue expansion and margin improvement underscore operational execution in a competitive landscape.

FRSH Overview and Recent Performance

Freshworks (FRSH) provides cloud-based software for customer engagement, IT service management, and related functions, targeting mid-market and smaller organizations with transparent pricing tiers. Recent market activity indicates the stock has faced pressure following earnings releases and forward guidance, contributing to a narrower trading band within its 52-week range. Despite these moves, the company continues to report sustained revenue growth and progress toward sustained profitability, aligning with industry trends in efficient SaaS operations. Sentiment has been influenced by comparisons to larger peers and overall caution in growth-oriented technology valuations during recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section that highlights select AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending list. Available data on the bots include ranges of historical returns, win rates, and drawdown metrics that can inform algorithmic approaches. The section serves as a resource for users seeking data-driven trading tools tailored to specific tickers and market environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Salesforce (CRM) and Freshworks (FRSH) differ substantially in scale and target markets, with CRM serving complex enterprise needs through extensive customization and integrations while FRSH emphasizes ease of use and predictable pricing for smaller teams. Growth drivers for CRM include large-scale AI deployments and ecosystem expansion, whereas FRSH benefits from efficient customer acquisition and Rule of 40 performance metrics. Recent momentum favors CRM's broader recovery in select periods, though both face sector-wide valuation scrutiny. Risk factors for CRM encompass execution on AI initiatives and competition intensity, while FRSH contends with smaller size and potential sensitivity to guidance revisions. Market sentiment positions CRM as a more stable large-cap holding and FRSH as a higher-beta growth name within the software application space.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, scale of operations, and relative positioning in AI adoption, Tickeron’s AI models indicate a probabilistic preference for Salesforce (CRM) in the current environment. Its larger market presence, consistent free cash flow profile, and established catalysts provide a more stable foundation compared to the smaller FRSH, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing market dynamics and company-specific developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRM vs. FRSH commentary
Sep 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and FRSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRM vs FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
CRM
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8372
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10089
SMR RATING
1..100
4847
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
859
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (17) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (59) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CRM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (47) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CRM (48) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (40) in the Restaurants industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (85) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CRM: $236.42 vs. FRSH: $12.45)
Brand notoriety: CRM: Notable vs. FRSH: Not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRM: 73% vs. FRSH: 38%
Market capitalization -- CRM: $195.81B vs. FRSH: $3.2B
CRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $195.81B. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $39 to $242.54B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than CRM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than CRM.

Price Growth

CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.71% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.74% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBTN11.110.65
+6.21%
Webtoon Entertainment Inc.
AZN168.102.02
+1.22%
AstraZeneca PLC
BACC10.49-0.07
-0.66%
Blue Acquisition Corp
SFM68.66-2.13
-3.01%
Sprouts Farmers Market
PFAI2.52-0.25
-9.03%
Pinnacle Food Group Limited

CRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRM
1D Price
Change %
CRM100%
-0.63%
NOW - CRM
79%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
HUBS - CRM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
ADBE - CRM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
WDAY - CRM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
TEAM - CRM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
More

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with VERX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then VERX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
+1.63%
VERX - FRSH
74%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
WDAY - FRSH
73%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
CRM - FRSH
73%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
ASAN - FRSH
73%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
DOCU - FRSH
72%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
More