OKE
Price
$93.17
Change
-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
58.69B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAA
Price
$24.60
Change
-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
17.37B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OKE vs PAA

OKE vs PAA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) vs. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ONEOK, Inc. (OKE) is a large, diversified midstream C-Corporation with approximately $55 billion in market capitalization and roughly 90% fee-based earnings, providing broad exposure across natural gas, NGLs (natural gas liquids), refined products, and crude oil infrastructure.
  • Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) is a more focused crude oil midstream Master Limited Partnership (MLP) with a market cap of approximately $15 billion, currently repositioning its portfolio through the divestiture of its Canadian NGL business and the full acquisition of the EPIC crude pipeline.
  • ONEOK delivered 12% net income growth in 2025 with adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) reaching $8.02 billion, while Plains generated steady but more modest adjusted EBITDA of approximately $2.84–$2.89 billion in the same period.
  • PAA offers a substantially higher distribution yield of roughly 7.4%, compared to OKE's dividend yield of approximately 4.9%, though OKE's payout is backed by stronger free cash flow coverage.
  • Both companies maintain investment-grade balance sheets, but ONEOK's larger scale and diversified asset base provide a different risk-reward profile compared to Plains' concentrated crude oil strategy.
  • ONEOK's 2026 guidance projects adjusted EBITDA near $8.1 billion, whereas PAA's 2026 outlook anticipates $2.75 billion, reflecting the ongoing structural divergence between the two businesses.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the energy midstream sector frequently encounter two distinct models: the diversified, C-Corporation infrastructure giant and the focused, high-yield Master Limited Partnership. OKE (ONEOK, Inc.) and PAA (Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.) embody this contrast. Both operate critical hydrocarbon transportation and processing assets across North America, yet their scale, structure, and strategic priorities diverge meaningfully. This comparison examines how these two midstream names have performed in the current market environment and what factors may shape their relative positioning going forward. Whether an investor prioritizes total return, income generation, or portfolio diversification will largely determine which of these two stocks aligns more closely with their objectives.

OKE Overview and Recent Performance

ONEOK, Inc. is a Tulsa-based midstream energy company operating across four core segments: Natural Gas Liquids, Refined Products and Crude, Natural Gas Gathering and Processing, and Natural Gas Pipelines. The company has undergone a significant transformation in recent years through a series of strategic acquisitions, including the purchases of Magellan Midstream Partners, EnLink Midstream, and Medallion Midstream. These transactions have expanded ONEOK's footprint from a historically NGL-focused operator into a fully integrated midstream platform spanning multiple commodities and geographies.

In recent market activity, ONEOK has demonstrated robust financial momentum. The company reported full-year 2025 net income attributable to ONEOK of $3.39 billion, representing a 12% year-over-year increase, while adjusted EBITDA rose 18% to $8.02 billion. Approximately 90% of ONEOK's earnings are fee-based, providing substantial insulation from commodity price volatility. The company has continued advancing organic growth projects, including the Bighorn natural gas processing plant in the Permian Basin and the Eiger Express Pipeline joint venture, which was recently expanded to 3.7 billion cubic feet per day with full long-term contracting. Cumulative acquisition-related synergies reached $475 million by year-end 2025, exceeding original expectations. Meanwhile, ONEOK extinguished nearly $3.1 billion of long-term debt during 2025 and raised its quarterly dividend by 4% to $1.07 per share. For 2026, management guided to an adjusted EBITDA midpoint of $8.1 billion, reflecting continued operational strength tempered by a moderation in producer activity tied to the projected commodity price environment.

PAA Overview and Recent Performance

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. is a Houston-based Master Limited Partnership that has historically operated across crude oil and NGL segments but is now executing a strategic pivot toward becoming a pure-play crude oil midstream provider. The partnership's crude oil segment encompasses an extensive network of pipelines, storage, and terminalling assets, with a particularly strong footprint in the Permian Basin — the most prolific oil-producing region in the United States.

In recent months, Plains has undertaken transformative portfolio actions. The company completed the acquisition of a 100% equity interest in the EPIC Crude Oil Pipeline (renamed Cactus III) in late 2025, solidifying its position in Permian-to-Gulf Coast crude transportation. Simultaneously, Plains signed a definitive agreement to divest substantially all of its Canadian NGL business to Keyera Corp. for approximately $3.75 billion, with closing expected in the first quarter of 2026. This repositioning is designed to streamline operations, enhance free cash flow durability, and sharpen the partnership's focus on its core crude oil competency. For full-year 2025, Plains guided to adjusted EBITDA attributable to PAA of $2.84 to $2.89 billion. The partnership exited the third quarter of 2025 with a leverage ratio of 3.3x, near the low end of its 3.25x–3.75x target range. PAA has increased its quarterly distribution by 20% year-over-year to $0.4175 per unit, delivering an approximate 7.4% distribution yield. For 2026, Plains provided adjusted EBITDA guidance of $2.75 billion, incorporating the impact of recently announced acquisitions and divestitures alongside expectations for improving oil market fundamentals.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's most capable AI-powered trading bots, drawn from a universe of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies. Each bot is designed with a unique trading style, strategy, and timeframe — ranging from swing trading and trend following to intraday scalping and momentum-based approaches. The bots featured in this curated section are those that have demonstrated the strongest alignment with current market conditions, making them worth closer examination by traders and investors seeking data-driven insights. Real-time performance statistics, win rates, trade counts, and drawdown metrics are available for each bot, allowing users to evaluate historical consistency and risk characteristics before committing capital. For traders interested in leveraging algorithmic strategies to navigate the midstream energy sector or broader markets, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a window into how artificial intelligence is being applied to modern trading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both OKE and PAA operate in the midstream energy space, their business models diverge considerably. ONEOK functions as a diversified C-Corporation with a broad asset base that spans NGL fractionation, natural gas processing, refined products pipelines, and crude oil transportation. This diversification reduces its sensitivity to any single commodity or region. Plains, by contrast, is an MLP that is concentrating its portfolio almost entirely on crude oil logistics — a strategy that amplifies its exposure to Permian Basin production trends and global crude demand dynamics but may also yield sharper upside when those fundamentals are favorable.

From a yield perspective, PAA holds a clear advantage with its roughly 7.4% distribution yield versus OKE's approximately 4.9% dividend yield. However, yield-oriented investors must weigh this against structural considerations: as an MLP, PAA issues a Schedule K-1 tax form, which introduces additional tax reporting complexity compared to OKE's standard 1099-DIV. ONEOK's stronger free cash flow coverage and lower payout ratio also suggest greater dividend sustainability and growth potential over time.

On valuation, the two stocks occupy different tiers. ONEOK trades at a higher price-to-earnings multiple — reflecting its C-Corp structure, larger scale, and diversified earnings mix — while PAA trades at a lower earnings multiple and a higher yield, consistent with the market's historical tendency to discount MLP securities. Institutional ownership of OKE is approximately 69%, compared to roughly 41% for PAA, reflecting broader institutional appetite for the C-Corp format. In terms of recent momentum, both stocks have navigated a period of commodity price moderation, but ONEOK's acquisition-driven growth and synergy realization have provided more visible earnings catalysts in recent quarters.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, diversification, and recent catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor OKE in the current market environment. ONEOK's nearly 90% fee-based earnings structure, double-digit adjusted EBITDA growth, and successful integration of transformative acquisitions suggest a more predictable and durable earnings trajectory. The company's diversified asset base across multiple commodities and basins provides a degree of resilience that a more concentrated crude oil portfolio may lack during periods of commodity price uncertainty. That said, PAA should not be dismissed: its strategic transformation into a pure-play crude operator, compelling 7.4% distribution yield, and disciplined balance sheet management make it a noteworthy candidate — particularly for income-focused investors comfortable with the MLP structure. The AI's probabilistic assessment would likely recognize both as viable holdings but identify ONEOK's scale, diversification, and earnings visibility as giving it a relative edge under current conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
OKE vs. PAA commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OKE is a Buy and PAA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (OKE: $93.23 vs. PAA: $24.69)
Brand notoriety: OKE: Not notable vs. PAA: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OKE: 79% vs. PAA: 67%
Market capitalization -- OKE: $58.69B vs. PAA: $17.37B
OKE [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $58.69B. PAA’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $17.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $124.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OKE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • OKE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OKE is a better buy in the long-term than PAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OKE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OKE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAA is a better buy in the short-term than OKE.

Price Growth

OKE (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while PAA (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +3.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

OKE is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

PAA is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.20% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OKE($58.7B) has a higher market cap than PAA($17.4B). PAA has higher P/E ratio than OKE: PAA (22.18) vs OKE (16.61). PAA YTD gains are higher at: 43.045 vs. OKE (30.122). OKE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.92B vs. PAA (2.91B). OKE (172M) and PAA (171M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PAA has less debt than OKE: PAA (11.6B) vs OKE (33.7B). PAA has higher revenues than OKE: PAA (45.3B) vs OKE (35.2B).
OKEPAAOKE / PAA
Capitalization58.7B17.4B337%
EBITDA7.92B2.91B272%
Gain YTD30.12243.04570%
P/E Ratio16.6122.1875%
Revenue35.2B45.3B78%
Total Cash172M171M101%
Total Debt33.7B11.6B291%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OKE vs PAA: Fundamental Ratings
OKE
PAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
444
SMR RATING
1..100
5473
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4235
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAA's Valuation (7) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (16). This means that PAA’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.

PAA's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OKE (44). This means that PAA’s stock grew somewhat faster than OKE’s over the last 12 months.

OKE's SMR Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (73). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.

OKE's Price Growth Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAA (39). This means that OKE’s stock grew similarly to PAA’s over the last 12 months.

PAA's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as OKE (42). This means that PAA’s stock grew similarly to OKE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OKEPAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OKE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRDY0.830.01
+0.62%
Nerdy
EVRG86.650.09
+0.10%
Evergy
NMIH41.58-0.11
-0.26%
NMI Holdings
OLB0.33-0.01
-3.65%
OLB Group Inc. (The)
IBTA26.29-1.00
-3.66%
Ibotta

OKE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OKE has been closely correlated with TRGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OKE jumps, then TRGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OKE
1D Price
Change %
OKE100%
+1.61%
TRGP - OKE
73%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
PAA - OKE
71%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
KMI - OKE
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
AM - OKE
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
PAGP - OKE
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More

PAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAA has been closely correlated with PAGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAA jumps, then PAGP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAA
1D Price
Change %
PAA100%
+0.98%
PAGP - PAA
96%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
AM - PAA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
WES - PAA
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
TRGP - PAA
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
ET - PAA
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More