Comparing AME and PH offers investors a window into two of the most respected names in the industrial technology landscape. AMETEK, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation both operate at the intersection of precision engineering, automation, and aerospace—sectors that have commanded significant investor attention amid reshoring trends and technological modernization. While they share overlapping end markets, their business models, growth strategies, and market positioning differ in meaningful ways. This comparison is particularly relevant for industrials-focused investors, those evaluating portfolio allocation within manufacturing and aerospace, and traders seeking to understand relative momentum between two high-quality industrial compounders.
AMETEK, Inc. (AME) is a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices, operating through two segments: Electronic Instruments Group (EIG) and Electromechanical Group (EMG). The company serves a wide range of end markets including aerospace, defense, medical, and industrial automation. AMETEK's long-term strategy has centered on acquiring niche businesses with strong margins and market-leading positions, then applying its operational excellence framework—known as the AMETEK Growth Model—to drive efficiency and profitability.
In recent weeks, AMETEK shares have traded within a relatively stable range, reflecting steady institutional interest and a risk-aware market environment. The company's most recent quarterly results showed organic sales growth across both segments, with particular strength in aerospace and defense applications. AMETEK's balance sheet remains conservatively managed, with leverage ratios well within historical norms, providing ample capacity for continued bolt-on acquisitions. Recent market activity suggests investors are valuing AMETEK's consistency and capital discipline alongside its exposure to long-cycle industrial demand.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is one of the world's largest motion and control technology companies, with a vast portfolio spanning hydraulic, pneumatic, electromechanical, and filtration systems. The company operates through two primary segments: Diversified Industrial and Aerospace Systems. Parker-Hannifin completed its transformative acquisition of Meggitt PLC in 2023, significantly expanding its aerospace footprint and creating a more balanced revenue mix between industrial and aerospace end markets.
Recent trading sessions have seen Parker-Hannifin shares exhibit notable relative strength, supported by stronger-than-expected aerospace aftermarket demand and solid order growth in its industrial businesses. The company's backlog has remained elevated, and management has communicated confidence in sustained demand across commercial aerospace, defense, and select industrial verticals. Parker-Hannifin's emphasis on connected technologies and electrification solutions has resonated with investors focused on long-term secular trends, while the integration of Meggitt has progressed ahead of initial synergy targets, contributing to margin expansion in recent quarters.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like AME and PH, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each tailored to specific trading styles, timeframes, and ticker universes—from swing trading and trend following to breakout strategies and mean reversion approaches. Only the bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in this featured section. Many of these robots showcase statistically backed performance metrics, including win rates, Sharpe ratios, and return profiles that span different risk appetites. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors identify automated strategies that complement their own research process.
When evaluating AME against PH, several differentiating factors emerge. Scale and End-Market Mix: Parker-Hannifin is roughly three times larger by market capitalization and revenue, with deeper penetration in large-scale aerospace platforms and hydraulic systems. AMETEK's more fragmented, niche-oriented portfolio provides diversification across thousands of smaller product lines, potentially reducing cyclicality but limiting exposure to large program wins. Growth Strategy: AMETEK's approach relies heavily on disciplined mergers and acquisitions (M&A)—typically targeting smaller, founder-owned businesses with high incremental margins. Parker-Hannifin also uses M&A but has demonstrated willingness to pursue larger, transformative deals like Meggitt. Margin Profiles: Both companies boast industry-leading margins, though AMETEK's operating margin has historically edged higher due to its asset-light, high-mix business composition. Risk Factors: Parker-Hannifin carries greater exposure to commercial aerospace cycles, while AMETEK's broader diversification may offer more resilience during sector-specific downturns. Recent Momentum: Parker-Hannifin has captured stronger upward price momentum in recent weeks, fueled by aerospace optimism, while AMETEK has maintained a steadier trajectory.
Based on observable market data and trend analysis, Tickeron's AI framework currently identifies PH as the stock demonstrating a comparatively stronger alignment of positive signals. This assessment reflects the presence of more consistent upward price trends, favorable momentum indicators, and the supportive backdrop of robust aerospace aftermarket demand that has acted as a near-term catalyst. AME continues to exhibit the hallmarks of a high-quality compounder—stable trends, disciplined capital allocation, and resilient margins—but its price action has been more range-bound relative to Parker-Hannifin's recent directional conviction. It is important to note that this represents a probabilistic evaluation based on algorithmic pattern recognition and does not predict future outcomes. As market conditions evolve, the relative positioning between these two well-regarded industrial names may shift accordingly.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AME’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AME (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +3.36% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +3.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.32%.
AME is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
PH is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| AME | PH | AME / PH | |
| Capitalization | 55.7B | 124B | 45% |
| EBITDA | 2.36B | 5.63B | 42% |
| Gain YTD | 18.782 | 12.791 | 147% |
| P/E Ratio | 36.73 | 36.43 | 101% |
| Revenue | 7.6B | 21B | 36% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 476M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 9.58B | 23% |
AME | PH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AME's Valuation (76) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as PH (78) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (16) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.
AME's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as PH (28) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (27) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that PH’s stock grew similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.
| AME | PH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 46% | 9 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AME has been closely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AME jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then IR could also see price increases.