ASMLF
Price
$743.10
Change
-$27.38 (-3.55%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
299.64B
QCOM
Price
$160.73
Change
-$0.07 (-0.04%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
173.43B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASMLF vs QCOM

Header iconASMLF vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts ASMLF vs QCOMBanner chart's image
ASML Holding
Price$743.10
Change-$27.38 (-3.55%)
Volume$671
Capitalization299.64B
QUALCOMM
Price$160.73
Change-$0.07 (-0.04%)
Volume$9.95M
Capitalization173.43B
ASMLF vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASMLF vs. QCOM commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASMLF is a Buy and QCOM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (ASMLF: $743.10 vs. QCOM: $160.73)
Brand notoriety: ASMLF: Not notable vs. QCOM: Notable
ASMLF represents the Electronic Production Equipment, while QCOM is part of the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASMLF: 57% vs. QCOM: 130%
Market capitalization -- ASMLF: $299.64B vs. QCOM: $173.43B
ASMLF [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $299.64B. QCOM’s [@Semiconductors] market capitalization is $173.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $299.64B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.24T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $23.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $89.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASMLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQCOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASMLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ASMLF and QCOM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASMLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QCOM’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than ASMLF.

Price Growth

ASMLF (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while QCOM (@Semiconductors) price change was +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.39%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+1.30% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+0.13% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASMLF($300B) has a higher market cap than QCOM($173B). ASMLF has higher P/E ratio than QCOM: ASMLF (26.52) vs QCOM (15.51). ASMLF YTD gains are higher at: 6.700 vs. QCOM (5.824). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.6B vs. ASMLF (12.4B). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. ASMLF (7.25B). ASMLF has less debt than QCOM: ASMLF (3.7B) vs QCOM (14.8B). QCOM has higher revenues than ASMLF: QCOM (43.3B) vs ASMLF (32.2B).
ASMLFQCOMASMLF / QCOM
Capitalization300B173B173%
EBITDA12.4B14.6B85%
Gain YTD6.7005.824115%
P/E Ratio26.5215.51171%
Revenue32.2B43.3B74%
Total Cash7.25B10B72%
Total Debt3.7B14.8B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASMLF vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
ASMLF
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1669
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5560
SMR RATING
1..100
1821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9285
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (14) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ASMLF (26) in the null industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to ASMLF’s over the last 12 months.

ASMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as QCOM (60) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASMLF’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

ASMLF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as QCOM (21) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASMLF’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

ASMLF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as QCOM (53) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ASMLF’s stock grew similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ASMLF (92) in the null industry. This means that QCOM’s stock grew similarly to ASMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMLFQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QCOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUGT106.966.26
+6.22%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF
IBBQ23.400.01
+0.03%
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
XCCC39.09-0.07
-0.18%
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
VGLT55.39-0.29
-0.52%
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
JXX26.60-0.23
-0.87%
Janus Henderson Transformational Gr ETF

ASMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASMLF has been closely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASMLF jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASMLF
1D Price
Change %
ASMLF100%
-3.55%
ASML - ASMLF
85%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
KLAC - ASMLF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.46%
LRCX - ASMLF
71%
Closely correlated
-3.79%
AMAT - ASMLF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.73%
ASMIY - ASMLF
71%
Closely correlated
-4.03%
More