AU
Price
$83.18
Change
+$4.71 (+6.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
42.06B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$97.59
Change
+$4.82 (+5.20%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
104.18B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs NEM

Header iconAU vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts AU vs NEMBanner chart's image
AU vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AngloGold Ashanti (AU) vs. Newmont (NEM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both AU and NEM have benefited from elevated gold prices in recent market activity, with YTD gains around 8% for each, though AU shows stronger one-year performance at approximately 136% versus NEM's 113%.
  • NEM, the world's largest gold producer, boasts a significantly larger market cap of about $116 billion compared to AU's $46 billion, offering greater scale and diversification across copper and other metals.
  • Recent weeks have seen both stocks face pullbacks, with AU down around 10% over the past month amid debt tenders and regulatory shifts in Ghana, while NEM dipped 10% post a $6 billion buyback announcement despite record Q1 results.
  • Valuation metrics indicate NEM trades at a lower trailing P/E (14.09) than AU (17.91), with both forward P/Es near 11x, suggesting comparable growth expectations.
  • Lower beta values (AU: 0.62; NEM: 0.45) highlight defensive qualities for both in volatile gold markets.

Introduction

AngloGold Ashanti (AU) and Newmont (NEM) stand as leading gold producers amid a sector buoyed by safe-haven demand, geopolitical tensions, and elevated metal prices. This stock comparison evaluates their business models, recent performance, and market positioning to aid investors and traders assessing relative opportunities in precious metals exposure. Gold-focused portfolios, sector rotation strategies, or those hedging inflation may find value in understanding contrasts between AU's focused operations across Africa, Australia, and the Americas versus NEM's global scale including copper by-products. Key metrics reveal trade-offs in growth, stability, and valuation for informed decision-making in the current environment.

AU Overview and Recent Performance

AngloGold Ashanti plc (AU) is a global gold mining company with operations in Africa, Australia, and the Americas, producing gold alongside by-products like silver and sulphuric acid. Its flagship Geita mine in Tanzania anchors output. Shares trade around $91 with a market cap of approximately $46 billion. Recent market activity has pressured the stock, with a roughly 10% decline over the past month and 3-10% drops in recent weeks, despite YTD gains near 8% and a robust 136% one-year return. Sentiment reflects broader gold sector volatility, offset by positives like a 4.9 million ounce reserve declaration at the Arthur Gold project in Nevada and strong FY25 results with $9.89 billion revenue and $5.47 billion EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). Challenges include insider sales and Ghana's directive for local contracting shifts by December 2026. Trailing EPS stands at $5.18, with forward P/E at 11.05x.

NEM Overview and Recent Performance

Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the world's largest gold producer, with assets spanning North and South America, Africa, Australia, and Papua New Guinea, also yielding copper, silver, zinc, and lead. Shares hover near $108, supported by a $116 billion market cap. In recent weeks, the stock has pulled back about 5-6% monthly and 1-2% over five days, following a 10% drop after authorizing a $6 billion share buyback despite record Q1 2026 results: $7.31 billion revenue and $3.16 billion earnings, beating estimates on higher gold prices. YTD performance approximates 8-9%, with 113% over one year. Key drivers include operational efficiencies and diversified metals, though elevated costs loom. Trailing EPS is $7.69 at a 14.09 trailing P/E, forward P/E near 11.15x, and $24.97 billion trailing revenue with $16.34 billion EBITDA.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn a spot among the 25 featured out of 351 total bots, emphasizing momentum, sector rotation, and high-volatility plays. Stats highlight impressive ranges: annualized returns up to +162%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70, covering sectors like semiconductors, gold miners, energy, and AI infrastructure. Examples include a gold miners bot alongside top performers in space and tech ETFs. Traders can explore these for copy trading to leverage AI-driven signals tailored to current trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AU and NEM operate in gold mining but differ in scale and diversification: NEM's vast portfolio spans more regions and metals like copper, reducing pure gold exposure risks compared to AU's concentrated assets. Growth drivers favor AU with a lower PEG ratio (0.78 vs. 2.78), signaling better value for expected earnings expansion, bolstered by Nevada reserves. Recent momentum tilts to NEM's steadier monthly decline versus AU's sharper pullback, aided by buybacks. Risk factors include geopolitical exposure in Africa for both, with AU facing Ghana mandates and NEM cost pressures. Sector ties are pure-play gold, but NEM benefits from broader commodities. Market sentiment leans positive for NEM via Strong Buy ratings and higher targets, while AU attracts value hunters at a valuation premium.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors NEM over AU, driven by superior scale, lower beta for stability, recent record earnings despite the buyback dip, and stronger analyst consensus. While AU offers momentum from project catalysts and better PEG, NEM's relative positioning and diversification provide a probabilistic edge in sustaining trends amid gold's volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
AU vs. NEM commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a StrongBuy and NEM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 12, 2026
Stock price -- (AU: $83.18 vs. NEM: $97.59)
Brand notoriety: AU: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 208% vs. NEM: 128%
Market capitalization -- AU: $42.06B vs. NEM: $104.18B
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $42.06B. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $104.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $10.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AU and NEM are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.75% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was -9.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -10.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -21.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-10.47% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($104B) has a higher market cap than AU($42.1B). NEM (12.66) and AU (12.21) have similar P/E ratio . AU YTD gains are higher at: 0.385 vs. NEM (-1.837). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. AU (5.76B). NEM has more cash in the bank: 8.78B vs. AU (3.15B). AU has less debt than NEM: AU (2.29B) vs NEM (5.53B). NEM has higher revenues than AU: NEM (25B) vs AU (11.2B).
AUNEMAU / NEM
Capitalization42.1B104B40%
EBITDA5.76B16.2B36%
Gain YTD0.385-1.837-21%
P/E Ratio12.2112.6696%
Revenue11.2B25B45%
Total Cash3.15B8.78B36%
Total Debt2.29B5.53B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
AU
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6068
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3756
SMR RATING
1..100
2237
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (5) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (60). This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (56). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (22) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (37). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AU (61). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AU (71). This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKO8.640.57
+7.00%
ARKO Corp
ON115.965.79
+5.26%
ON Semiconductor Corp
JRVR4.240.06
+1.56%
James River Group Holdings Ltd
BRN1.070.01
+0.47%
Barnwell Industries
ATAT33.38-0.13
-0.39%
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+5.20%
KGC - NEM
87%
Closely correlated
+5.07%
AEM - NEM
87%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
GFI - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+7.07%
WPM - NEM
84%
Closely correlated
+4.78%
EGO - NEM
83%
Closely correlated
+7.27%
More