AUB
Price
$42.54
Change
-$0.34 (-0.79%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.08B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFBS
Price
$90.53
Change
-$0.80 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.95B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs SFBS

AUB vs SFBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. SFBS commentary
Aug 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a StrongBuy and SFBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $42.54 vs. SFBS: $90.53)
Brand notoriety: AUB and SFBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 63% vs. SFBS: 53%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $6.08B vs. SFBS: $4.95B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.08B. SFBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSFBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the long-term than SFBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SFBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the short-term than SFBS.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.14% price change this week, while SFBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($6.08B) has a higher market cap than SFBS($4.95B). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than AUB: SFBS (15.42) vs AUB (12.40). SFBS YTD gains are higher at: 28.001 vs. AUB (23.913). AUB has more cash in the bank: 451M vs. SFBS (101M). SFBS has less debt than AUB: SFBS (34.8M) vs AUB (1.16B). AUB has higher revenues than SFBS: AUB (1.53B) vs SFBS (583M).
AUBSFBSAUB / SFBS
Capitalization6.08B4.95B123%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.91328.00185%
P/E Ratio12.4015.4280%
Revenue1.53B583M263%
Total Cash451M101M447%
Total Debt1.16B34.8M3,333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs SFBS: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
SFBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8390
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5766
SMR RATING
1..100
2332
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8165
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUB's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFBS (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (81) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBSFBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHYS33.610.38
+1.14%
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
ASGM32.410.23
+0.73%
Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF
IDE13.360.01
+0.07%
Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund
DEEF40.46N/A
N/A
Xtrackers FTSE Develop ex US Mulfact ETF
QQH85.59-0.40
-0.47%
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

AUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUB
1D Price
Change %
AUB100%
-0.79%
UBSI - AUB
90%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
UCB - AUB
89%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
FULT - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
CATY - AUB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
SSB - AUB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
More

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-0.88%
SFNC - SFBS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
UBSI - SFBS
82%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
TRMK - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
CATY - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
AUB - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
More