SFBS
Price
$84.92
Change
-$0.43 (-0.50%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$22.98
Change
+$0.12 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFBS vs SFNC

SFBS vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SFBS vs. SFNC commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBS is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (SFBS: $84.92 vs. SFNC: $22.98)
Brand notoriety: SFBS and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBS: 59% vs. SFNC: 38%
Market capitalization -- SFBS: $4.64B vs. SFNC: $3.34B
SFBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.64B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.64B) has a higher market cap than SFNC($3.34B). SFBS has higher P/E ratio than SFNC: SFBS (15.67) vs SFNC (13.73). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 24.502 vs. SFBS (20.069). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. SFBS (101M). SFBS has less debt than SFNC: SFBS (34.8M) vs SFNC (762M). SFBS has higher revenues than SFNC: SFBS (583M) vs SFNC (126M).
SFBSSFNCSFBS / SFNC
Capitalization4.64B3.34B139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.06924.50282%
P/E Ratio15.6713.73114%
Revenue583M126M463%
Total Cash101M343M29%
Total Debt34.8M762M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFBS vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
SFBS
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8685
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
3271
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (88) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (86) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFBSSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNGE31.570.07
+0.21%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
RBLY13.76-0.06
-0.47%
Yieldmax Rblx Option Income Strategy ETF
AIEQ49.90-0.29
-0.59%
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
ESGV132.52-1.27
-0.95%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF
WTAI41.59-2.20
-5.02%
WisdomTree Artfcl Intllgnc & Innvtn ETF

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
-0.50%
SFNC - SFBS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UBSI - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
TRMK - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
UCB - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
CATY - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.52%
UCB - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
UBSI - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
FNB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
AUB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
CATY - SFNC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More