SFBS
Price
$82.93
Change
+$1.01 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.53B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFNC
Price
$22.48
Change
+$0.31 (+1.40%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.26B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SFBS vs SFNC

SFBS vs SFNC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) vs. Simmons First National (SFNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) holds a larger market capitalization of $4.27 billion compared to Simmons First National (SFNC)'s $3.14 billion.
  • Both regional banks reported first-quarter 2026 earnings recently, with SFBS demonstrating strong profit margins of 52.61% despite missing revenue estimates, while SFNC showed 10% annualized loan growth and net interest margin (NIM, the difference between interest income and expense) expansion.
  • SFNC has outperformed year-to-date with 16.23% gains versus SFBS's 10%.
  • SFBS exhibits superior return on equity (ROE, net income divided by shareholders' equity) at 15.96% trailing twelve months (TTM), contrasting SFNC's -10.37% TTM.
  • Price-to-book ratios highlight SFBS at 2.30 versus SFNC at 0.91, signaling differing market valuations of assets.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines SFBS and SFNC, two regional banks operating in the Southeastern and Midwestern U.S. markets. Both provide commercial and consumer lending amid evolving interest rates and economic conditions, making them relevant for investors seeking exposure to financial services with regional diversification. Traders analyzing relative performance may find value in their contrasting momentum, profitability, and growth trajectories during recent market activity. This analysis draws on key metrics and developments to inform stock comparison decisions.

SFBS Overview and Recent Performance

ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) serves as the holding company for ServisFirst Bank, focusing on deposit products like checking and savings accounts, alongside loans emphasizing commercial real estate, construction, and business lines of credit. Headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, it operates primarily in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Tennessee.

In recent weeks, SFBS shares have traded around $78 within a 52-week range of $66 to $91, reflecting year-to-date gains of 10%. Earnings season highlighted quarterly revenue growth of 22.5% year-over-year (yoy) and net income expansion of 32.5% yoy, though revenue fell short of estimates. Strong profit margins above 50% and a dividend yield near 2% have supported sentiment, bolstered by resilient return on assets (ROA, net income over total assets) at 1.58% TTM. Regional banking pressures, including interest rate sensitivity, have influenced price behavior, yet dividend appeal sustains investor interest.

SFNC Overview and Recent Performance

Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) is the holding company for Simmons Bank, offering deposits, consumer and commercial loans, credit cards, and treasury services across Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas.

Recent market activity saw SFNC shares near $22 in a 52-week range of $17 to $22, with year-to-date returns of 16.23%. First-quarter 2026 results featured 10% annualized loan growth, NIM expansion, and quarterly revenue up 24.1% yoy, aligning closely with estimates despite TTM challenges. Positive outlook for 9-11% net interest income (NII, interest revenue minus expenses) growth in 2026 has driven sentiment shifts. Exposure to diverse regional economies aids stability, though prior-year losses weigh on TTM metrics like ROE.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks and ETFs. These virtual agents deliver real-time signals using AI/ML-driven strategies like trend following and scalping on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout stats include annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates of 53% to 87%, and profit factors (gross profit over gross loss) from 1.5 to 11.7. Examples span sectors: semiconductor bots yielding +96% returns on tickers like LRCX and NVDA; finance agents on GS and MS with +52% gains; and small-cap trend traders at +100%. Diverse styles suit swing traders to day traders. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with current market conditions and your risk profile.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both SFBS and SFNC operate regional bank models centered on lending and deposits, but SFBS leans toward commercial real estate and business loans in the Southeast, while SFNC balances consumer, agricultural, and SBA (Small Business Administration) lending across a wider footprint.

Growth drivers differ: SFNC emphasizes loan expansion and NII outlook, contrasting SFBS's revenue momentum from deposits and fees. Recent momentum favors SFNC's YTD edge, but SFBS shows greater stability via higher price-to-book and positive ROE.

Risk factors include shared sector exposure to interest rates and commercial real estate (CRE) cycles, with SFNC potentially diversified by agriculture. Market sentiment post-earnings tilts positive for both, though SFBS's dividend and margins provide a trade-off for income-focused positioning over SFNC's growth narrative.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SFBS with higher probability due to consistent profitability, superior TTM ROE of 15.96%, robust margins, and stronger balance sheet metrics amid recent quarters. While SFNC offers compelling loan growth and momentum, SFBS's trend stability and valuation position it better for relative outperformance in the regional banking sector.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SFBS vs. SFNC commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SFBS is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (SFBS: $82.94 vs. SFNC: $22.48)
Brand notoriety: SFBS and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SFBS: 128% vs. SFNC: 107%
Market capitalization -- SFBS: $4.53B vs. SFNC: $3.26B
SFBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.53B. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SFBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SFBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the long-term than SFNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SFBS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SFBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFBS is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.56% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 20, 2026.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFBS($4.53B) has a higher market cap than SFNC($3.26B). SFBS (13.84) and SFNC (13.73) have similar P/E ratio . SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 20.167 vs. SFBS (15.320). SFNC has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. SFBS (95.1M). SFBS has less debt than SFNC: SFBS (34.8M) vs SFNC (762M). SFBS has higher revenues than SFNC: SFBS (583M) vs SFNC (126M).
SFBSSFNCSFBS / SFNC
Capitalization4.53B3.26B139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.32020.16776%
P/E Ratio13.8413.73101%
Revenue583M126M463%
Total Cash95.1M343M28%
Total Debt34.8M762M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SFBS vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
SFBS
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3541
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
3171
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8520

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFBS's Valuation (85) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's SMR Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFNC (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SFBS (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.

SFBS's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (84) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SFBSSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SFBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ETHU13.910.41
+3.04%
2x Ether ETF
NHYM25.04-0.01
-0.02%
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Income ETF
PTLC58.03-0.25
-0.43%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Large Cap ETF
HPI16.07-0.11
-0.68%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
SAGP34.30-0.26
-0.74%
Strategas Global Policy Opp ETF

SFBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFBS
1D Price
Change %
SFBS100%
+1.81%
SFNC - SFBS
83%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
UBSI - SFBS
82%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
TRMK - SFBS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
UCB - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
CATY - SFBS
80%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with UCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then UCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+1.28%
UCB - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
UBSI - SFNC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
FNB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
AUB - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CATY - SFNC
85%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More