AZASF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
22.09M
NEM
Price
$65.75
Change
+$4.24 (+6.89%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
42B
89 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZASF vs NEM

Header iconAZASF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts AZASF vs NEMBanner chart's image
Arizona Gold & Silver
Price$0.23
Change+$0.02 (+9.52%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization22.09M
Newmont
Price$65.75
Change+$4.24 (+6.89%)
Volume$30.91M
Capitalization42B
AZASF vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZASF vs. NEM commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZASF is a StrongBuy and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AZASF: $0.23 vs. NEM: $65.75)
Brand notoriety: AZASF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZASF: 4% vs. NEM: 251%
Market capitalization -- AZASF: $22.09M vs. NEM: $42B
AZASF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.09M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than AZASF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZASF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the short-term than AZASF.

Price Growth

AZASF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.55% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.16% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than AZASF($22.1M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 78.533 vs. AZASF (-32.452). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. AZASF (-1.48M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. AZASF (135K). AZASF has less debt than NEM: AZASF (100K) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than AZASF: NEM (11.8B) vs AZASF (0).
AZASFNEMAZASF / NEM
Capitalization22.1M42B0%
EBITDA-1.48M320M-0%
Gain YTD-32.45278.533-41%
P/E RatioN/A36.25-
Revenue011.8B-
Total Cash135K3.03B0%
Total Debt100K9.44B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZASF vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
AZASF
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6874
SMR RATING
1..100
9350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8611
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZASF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

AZASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (74) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (50) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZASF (93) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZASF (86) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew significantly faster than AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZASFNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OCTU26.870.08
+0.30%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncOctETF
KHYB24.250.07
+0.27%
KraneShares Asia Pacific Hi Inc USD ETF
IBTK19.670.03
+0.15%
iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Trsry ETF
SNOV23.560.03
+0.15%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Nov
DFIS30.620.03
+0.10%
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF

AZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZASF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZASF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZASF
1D Price
Change %
AZASF100%
+9.00%
SAND - AZASF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
HL - AZASF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
SSRM - AZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
NEM - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+6.89%
EGO - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+6.89%
AEM - NEM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.84%
WPM - NEM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
RGLD - NEM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
AGI - NEM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
KGC - NEM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
More