AZASF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.09M
NEM
Price
$59.90
Change
-$0.16 (-0.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
42B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZASF vs NEM

Header iconAZASF vs NEM Comparison
Open Charts AZASF vs NEMBanner chart's image
Arizona Gold & Silver
Price$0.23
Change-$0.01 (-4.17%)
Volume$6K
Capitalization22.09M
Newmont
Price$59.90
Change-$0.16 (-0.27%)
Volume$5.39M
Capitalization42B
AZASF vs NEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZASF vs. NEM commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZASF is a Hold and NEM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AZASF: $0.23 vs. NEM: $59.90)
Brand notoriety: AZASF: Not notable vs. NEM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZASF: 26% vs. NEM: 44%
Market capitalization -- AZASF: $22.09M vs. NEM: $42B
AZASF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.09M. NEM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZASF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AZASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AZASF is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZASF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AZASF and NEM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AZASF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.13% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($42B) has a higher market cap than AZASF($22.1M). NEM YTD gains are higher at: 62.648 vs. AZASF (-31.718). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 320M vs. AZASF (-1.48M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. AZASF (135K). AZASF has less debt than NEM: AZASF (100K) vs NEM (9.44B). NEM has higher revenues than AZASF: NEM (11.8B) vs AZASF (0).
AZASFNEMAZASF / NEM
Capitalization22.1M42B0%
EBITDA-1.48M320M-0%
Gain YTD-31.71862.648-51%
P/E RatioN/A36.25-
Revenue011.8B-
Total Cash135K3.03B0%
Total Debt100K9.44B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZASF vs NEM: Fundamental Ratings
AZASF
NEM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6676
SMR RATING
1..100
9351
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
626
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10079
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AZASF's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (93) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

AZASF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (76) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AZASF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (51) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZASF (93) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AZASF (62) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AZASF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to AZASF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZASFNEM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMCS31.470.09
+0.27%
Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF
PZT21.600.04
+0.19%
Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF
CSF51.03N/A
N/A
VictoryShares US Discovery Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
DMBS48.77N/A
N/A
DoubleLine Mortgage ETF
FIXD43.77-0.09
-0.21%
First Trust Smith Opportnstc Fxd Inc ETF

AZASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AZASF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AZASF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZASF
1D Price
Change %
AZASF100%
-3.12%
SAND - AZASF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
HL - AZASF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
SSRM - AZASF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
NEM - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
EGO - AZASF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
-0.27%
AEM - NEM
77%
Closely correlated
N/A
WPM - NEM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
RGLD - NEM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
AGI - NEM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
KGC - NEM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
More