BAM
Price
$50.60
Change
+$0.31 (+0.62%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
81.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BBUC
Price
$28.02
Change
+$0.71 (+2.60%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.78B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BBUC

BAM vs BBUC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. BBUC commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and BBUC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $50.60 vs. BBUC: $28.02)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BBUC are both not notable
BAM represents the Investment Managers, while BBUC is part of the Industrial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 141% vs. BBUC: 114%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $81.08B vs. BBUC: $5.78B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $81.08B. BBUC’s [@Industrial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $5.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $139.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.49B. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Conglomerates] industry is $6.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBBUC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BBUC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBUC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BBUC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBUC is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while BBUC (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.15%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -1.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBUC is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.69% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

@Industrial Conglomerates (-1.52% weekly)

Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($81.1B) has a higher market cap than BBUC($5.78B). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -0.440 vs. BBUC (-21.419). BBUC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.23B vs. BAM (4.19B). BBUC has more cash in the bank: 4.11B vs. BAM (1.5B). BAM has less debt than BBUC: BAM (5.26B) vs BBUC (45.7B). BBUC has higher revenues than BAM: BBUC (26.9B) vs BAM (4.82B).
BAMBBUCBAM / BBUC
Capitalization81.1B5.78B1,404%
EBITDA4.19B7.23B58%
Gain YTD-0.440-21.4192%
P/E Ratio29.08N/A-
Revenue4.82B26.9B18%
Total Cash1.5B4.11B37%
Total Debt5.26B45.7B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBBUC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BBUC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UUUG4.630.07
+1.49%
Leverage Shares 2X Long UUUU Daily ETF
TMAT28.250.29
+1.04%
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
SECU49.32-0.03
-0.06%
iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
DFAC45.72-0.04
-0.09%
Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF
EASY27.27-0.29
-1.04%
Liberty One Defensive Div Gr ETF

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+0.62%
BN - BAM
84%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BX - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
ARES - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
CG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
More