BMA vs KEY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMA is a StrongBuy and KEY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- KEY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.28% price change this week, while KEY (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
BMA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
KEY is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.30% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BMA | KEY | BMA / KEY | |
| Capitalization | 3.14B | 14.7B | 21% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 89.76 | 17.60 | 510% |
| Revenue | 573B | 6.22B | 9,220% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 22.6B | - |
BMA | KEY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KEY's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BMA (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew similarly to BMA’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for KEY (83) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew significantly faster than KEY’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.
BMA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KEY (48) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BMA’s stock grew similarly to KEY’s over the last 12 months.
KEY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BMA (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KEY’s stock grew significantly faster than BMA’s over the last 12 months.
| BMA | KEY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
BMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMA has been closely correlated with GGAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BMA jumps, then GGAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMA | 100% | N/A | ||
| GGAL - BMA | 88% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BBAR - BMA | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SUPV - BMA | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SBNY - BMA | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CIB - BMA | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
KEY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KEY has been closely correlated with CFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KEY jumps, then CFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CFG - KEY | 85% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| RF - KEY | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| HBAN - KEY | 82% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FNB - KEY | 80% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZION - KEY | 80% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||