Advertisement
BMY vs MDCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMY is a Buy and MDCX is a Hold.
| BMY | MDCX | BMY / MDCX | |
| Capitalization | 130B | 10.2M | 1,274,510% |
| EBITDA | 16.8B | -43.28M | -38,814% |
| Gain YTD | 21.970 | -89.373 | -25% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.02 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 49.2B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 11.1B | 15.2M | 73,026% |
| Total Debt | 45.1B | 21.6M | 208,796% |
BMY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BMY | MDCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 57% | 18 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BMY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MDCX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MDCX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BMY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDCX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BMY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -4.76% price change this week, while MDCX (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -5.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
BMY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
MDCX is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.36% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
Advertisement
BMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BMY has been loosely correlated with PFE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BMY jumps, then PFE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMY | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| PFE - BMY | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| AMGN - BMY | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| NVS - BMY | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| GSK - BMY | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| ABBV - BMY | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
MDCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MDCX and BMY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDCX and BMY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDCX | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| BMY - MDCX | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
| SNY - MDCX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| MRK - MDCX | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| NVS - MDCX | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.23% | ||
| AMGN - MDCX | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||