BPAQF
Price
$5.57
Change
-$0.13 (-2.28%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.67B
XOM
Price
$109.23
Change
-$3.17 (-2.82%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
465.67B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPAQF vs XOM

Header iconBPAQF vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts BPAQF vs XOMBanner chart's image
BP
Price$5.57
Change-$0.13 (-2.28%)
Volume$4.7K
Capitalization88.67B
Exxon Mobil
Price$109.23
Change-$3.17 (-2.82%)
Volume$16.83M
Capitalization465.67B
BPAQF vs XOM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPAQF vs. XOM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAQF is a Hold and XOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BPAQF: $5.57 vs. XOM: $109.23)
Brand notoriety: BPAQF: Not notable vs. XOM: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPAQF: 41% vs. XOM: 118%
Market capitalization -- BPAQF: $88.67B vs. XOM: $465.67B
BPAQF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $88.67B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $465.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $465.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPAQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPAQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the long-term than BPAQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPAQF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPAQF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than BPAQF.

Price Growth

BPAQF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -5.33% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

XOM is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.54% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($466B) has a higher market cap than BPAQF($88.7B). BPAQF has higher P/E ratio than XOM: BPAQF (131.87) vs XOM (15.52). BPAQF YTD gains are higher at: 19.209 vs. XOM (4.357). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 70.6B vs. BPAQF (28.9B). BPAQF has more cash in the bank: 35.3B vs. XOM (14.4B). XOM has less debt than BPAQF: XOM (39B) vs BPAQF (75B). XOM has higher revenues than BPAQF: XOM (329B) vs BPAQF (187B).
BPAQFXOMBPAQF / XOM
Capitalization88.7B466B19%
EBITDA28.9B70.6B41%
Gain YTD19.2094.357441%
P/E Ratio131.8715.52850%
Revenue187B329B57%
Total Cash35.3B14.4B245%
Total Debt75B39B192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPAQF vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
BPAQF
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8122
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
348
SMR RATING
1..100
9164
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
134
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XOM's Valuation (81) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (99) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (34) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (64) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (91) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (48) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (34) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BPAQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPAQFXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPAQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IETC98.370.93
+0.95%
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Fcs ETF
MNBD25.680.11
+0.42%
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF
JAAA50.61-0.01
-0.02%
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
MSTZ5.07-0.27
-5.06%
T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF
AMDY7.39-0.47
-5.98%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF

BPAQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPAQF has been loosely correlated with TTFNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPAQF jumps, then TTFNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPAQF
1D Price
Change %
BPAQF100%
-2.28%
TTFNF - BPAQF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BP - BPAQF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
SHEL - BPAQF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
E - BPAQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
XOM - BPAQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
-2.82%
CVX - XOM
81%
Closely correlated
-2.56%
SU - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CVE - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
-3.22%
IMO - XOM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
More