BPAQF
Price
$4.68
Change
-$0.15 (-3.11%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
107.42B
XOM
Price
$108.36
Change
-$0.27 (-0.25%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
461.22B
2 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPAQF vs XOM

Header iconBPAQF vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts BPAQF vs XOMBanner chart's image
BP
Price$4.68
Change-$0.15 (-3.11%)
Volume$16.31K
Capitalization107.42B
Exxon Mobil
Price$108.36
Change-$0.27 (-0.25%)
Volume$9.48M
Capitalization461.22B
BPAQF vs XOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPAQF vs. XOM commentary
Apr 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAQF is a Buy and XOM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 30, 2025
Stock price -- (BPAQF: $4.68 vs. XOM: $108.36)
Brand notoriety: BPAQF: Not notable vs. XOM: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPAQF: 19% vs. XOM: 52%
Market capitalization -- BPAQF: $107.42B vs. XOM: $461.22B
BPAQF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $107.42B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $461.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPAQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPAQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPAQF is a better buy in the long-term than XOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPAQF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPAQF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than BPAQF.

Price Growth

BPAQF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.58% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($461B) has a higher market cap than BPAQF($107B). XOM has higher P/E ratio than BPAQF: XOM (13.16) vs BPAQF (4.49). XOM YTD gains are higher at: 1.635 vs. BPAQF (-2.676). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.3B vs. BPAQF (62.1B). XOM (31.5B) and BPAQF (30.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . XOM has less debt than BPAQF: XOM (41.6B) vs BPAQF (57.2B). XOM has higher revenues than BPAQF: XOM (335B) vs BPAQF (248B).
BPAQFXOMBPAQF / XOM
Capitalization107B461B23%
EBITDA62.1B74.3B84%
Gain YTD-2.6761.635-164%
P/E Ratio4.4913.1634%
Revenue248B335B74%
Total Cash30.9B31.5B98%
Total Debt57.2B41.6B138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPAQF vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
BPAQF
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1061
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
506
SMR RATING
1..100
8456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
153
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XOM's Valuation (86) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (99) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPAQF (50) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (56) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (84) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (62) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (53) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BPAQF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPAQFXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPAQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLGEX62.81N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth E
FGFRX39.66N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
MGFNX8.37N/A
N/A
MassMutual Global R3
PPYIX8.29N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE International Instl
TSGMX14.17N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Growth Eq R6

BPAQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPAQF has been loosely correlated with TTFNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPAQF jumps, then TTFNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPAQF
1D Price
Change %
BPAQF100%
-3.05%
TTFNF - BPAQF
38%
Loosely correlated
-4.49%
BP - BPAQF
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
SHEL - BPAQF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
E - BPAQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
XOM - BPAQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
-0.25%
CVX - XOM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
SU - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
BP - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
-3.64%
IMO - XOM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More