BPAQF
Price
$5.73
Change
-$0.21 (-3.54%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
92.42B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XOM
Price
$117.35
Change
-$1.68 (-1.41%)
Updated
Nov 19 closing price
Capitalization
494.86B
71 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPAQF vs XOM

Header iconBPAQF vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts BPAQF vs XOMBanner chart's image
BP
Price$5.73
Change-$0.21 (-3.54%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization92.42B
Exxon Mobil
Price$117.35
Change-$1.68 (-1.41%)
Volume$15.92M
Capitalization494.86B
BPAQF vs XOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPAQF vs. XOM commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAQF is a Hold and XOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BPAQF: $5.73 vs. XOM: $117.35)
Brand notoriety: BPAQF: Not notable vs. XOM: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPAQF: 2% vs. XOM: 109%
Market capitalization -- BPAQF: $92.42B vs. XOM: $494.86B
BPAQF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $92.42B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $494.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $494.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $62.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPAQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPAQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the long-term than BPAQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPAQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPAQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the short-term than BPAQF.

Price Growth

BPAQF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.63% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.52% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($495B) has a higher market cap than BPAQF($92.4B). BPAQF has higher P/E ratio than XOM: BPAQF (55.85) vs XOM (17.06). BPAQF YTD gains are higher at: 24.407 vs. XOM (13.096). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 70.6B vs. BPAQF (31.3B). XOM has less debt than BPAQF: XOM (39B) vs BPAQF (75B). XOM has higher revenues than BPAQF: XOM (329B) vs BPAQF (188B).
BPAQFXOMBPAQF / XOM
Capitalization92.4B495B19%
EBITDA31.3B70.6B44%
Gain YTD24.40713.096186%
P/E Ratio55.8517.06327%
Revenue188B329B57%
Total Cash5.8BN/A-
Total Debt75B39B192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPAQF vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
BPAQF
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
215
SMR RATING
1..100
10062
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4430
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
826
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPAQF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as XOM (79) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BPAQF’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (21) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (62) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPAQF (100) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (30) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (44) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as XOM (26) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BPAQF’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPAQFXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPAQF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IQSM33.220.01
+0.02%
NYLI Candriam U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
RFLR27.33-0.06
-0.21%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Mgd Flr ETF
IHAK48.56-0.29
-0.59%
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
SCHD26.93-0.23
-0.85%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
ENOR27.01-0.35
-1.30%
iShares MSCI Norway ETF

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
-1.41%
CVX - XOM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
SU - XOM
77%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
SHEL - XOM
76%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
CVE - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
EQNR - XOM
70%
Closely correlated
-4.16%
More