Ad is loading...
BPAQF
Price
$4.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
XOM
Price
$121.93
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPAQF vs XOM

Header iconBPAQF vs XOM Comparison
Open Charts BPAQF vs XOMBanner chart's image
BP
Price$4.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$59.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Exxon Mobil
Price$121.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.68M
CapitalizationN/A
BPAQF vs XOM Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPAQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPAQF vs. XOM commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAQF is a StrongBuy and XOM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BPAQF: $4.86 vs. XOM: $121.93)
Brand notoriety: BPAQF: Not notable vs. XOM: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPAQF: 86% vs. XOM: 105%
Market capitalization -- BPAQF: $107.42B vs. XOM: $461.22B
BPAQF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $107.42B. XOM’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $461.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPAQF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPAQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XOM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XOM is a better buy in the long-term than BPAQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPAQF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XOM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPAQF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • XOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPAQF is a better buy in the short-term than XOM.

Price Growth

BPAQF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while XOM (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

XOM is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.01% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XOM($461B) has a higher market cap than BPAQF($107B). XOM has higher P/E ratio than BPAQF: XOM (13.16) vs BPAQF (4.49). XOM YTD gains are higher at: 26.114 vs. BPAQF (-13.375). XOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 74.3B vs. BPAQF (62.1B). XOM (31.5B) and BPAQF (30.9B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . XOM has less debt than BPAQF: XOM (41.6B) vs BPAQF (57.2B). XOM has higher revenues than BPAQF: XOM (335B) vs BPAQF (248B).
BPAQFXOMBPAQF / XOM
Capitalization107B461B23%
EBITDA62.1B74.3B84%
Gain YTD-13.37526.114-51%
P/E Ratio4.4913.1634%
Revenue248B335B74%
Total Cash30.9B31.5B98%
Total Debt57.2B41.6B138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPAQF vs XOM: Fundamental Ratings
BPAQF
XOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2571
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9412
SMR RATING
1..100
8357
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

XOM's Valuation (89) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (95) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPAQF (94) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew significantly faster than BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's SMR Rating (57) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as BPAQF (83) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew similarly to BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

XOM's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPAQF (79) in the null industry. This means that XOM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPAQF’s over the last 12 months.

BPAQF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as XOM (26) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that BPAQF’s stock grew similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPAQFXOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPAQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
XOM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXL15.741.05
+7.15%
MaxLinear
OKE116.753.59
+3.17%
Oneok
KMDA5.850.03
+0.52%
Kamada Ltd
AAP38.690.06
+0.16%
Advance Auto Parts
LVTX1.48-0.04
-2.63%
LAVA Therapeutics NV

BPAQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPAQF has been loosely correlated with TTFNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPAQF jumps, then TTFNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPAQF
1D Price
Change %
BPAQF100%
+3.41%
TTFNF - BPAQF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
BP - BPAQF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
SHEL - BPAQF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
E - BPAQF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
XOM - BPAQF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.34%
More

XOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XOM has been closely correlated with CVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XOM jumps, then CVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XOM
1D Price
Change %
XOM100%
+1.34%
CVX - XOM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
IMO - XOM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
SU - XOM
68%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
SHEL - XOM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
BP - XOM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
More