BPYPO
Price
$13.86
Change
-$0.27 (-1.91%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
NMRK
Price
$10.33
Change
-$0.72 (-6.52%)
Updated
Apr 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.88B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BPYPO vs NMRK

Header iconBPYPO vs NMRK Comparison
Open Charts BPYPO vs NMRKBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$13.86
Change-$0.27 (-1.91%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Newmark Group
Price$10.33
Change-$0.72 (-6.52%)
Volume$18.58K
Capitalization1.88B
BPYPO vs NMRK Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPO vs. NMRK commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPO is a Hold and NMRK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPO: $14.02 vs. NMRK: $11.05)
Brand notoriety: BPYPO and NMRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPO: 95% vs. NMRK: 135%
Market capitalization -- BPYPO: $0 vs. NMRK: $1.88B
BPYPO [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $0. NMRK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPYPO and NMRK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NMRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPO is a better buy in the short-term than NMRK.

Price Growth

BPYPO (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.30% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -10.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-2.93% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPO YTD gains are higher at: 5.832 vs. NMRK (-13.563). BPYPO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3B vs. NMRK (291M). BPYPO has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. NMRK (165M). NMRK has less debt than BPYPO: NMRK (1.75B) vs BPYPO (71B). BPYPO has higher revenues than NMRK: BPYPO (9.48B) vs NMRK (2.47B).
BPYPONMRKBPYPO / NMRK
CapitalizationN/A1.88B-
EBITDA3B291M1,029%
Gain YTD5.832-13.563-43%
P/E RatioN/A45.33-
Revenue9.48B2.47B384%
Total Cash2.34B165M1,419%
Total Debt71B1.75B4,055%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMRK: Fundamental Ratings
NMRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPONMRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPYPO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKIL19.242.76
+16.75%
Skillsoft Corp
AYI245.8822.57
+10.11%
Acuity Brands
TSLX20.381.22
+6.37%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
URGN10.080.42
+4.35%
UroGen Pharma Ltd
CITY.X1.078305-0.064390
-5.63%
Manchester City Fan Token cryptocurrency

BPYPO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPO has been closely correlated with BPYPP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPYPO jumps, then BPYPP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPO
1D Price
Change %
BPYPO100%
+3.09%
BPYPP - BPYPO
73%
Closely correlated
+2.79%
BPYPN - BPYPO
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
NMRK - BPYPO
31%
Poorly correlated
+7.91%
JLL - BPYPO
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.40%
OPAD - BPYPO
28%
Poorly correlated
+9.86%
More

NMRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMRK
1D Price
Change %
NMRK100%
+7.91%
JLL - NMRK
83%
Closely correlated
+7.40%
CBRE - NMRK
80%
Closely correlated
+6.43%
CWK - NMRK
76%
Closely correlated
+5.28%
MMI - NMRK
74%
Closely correlated
+4.85%
CIGI - NMRK
66%
Closely correlated
+7.95%
More