Investors and traders seeking to compare mid- and large-cap insurance sector equities often examine Brown & Brown (BRO) and Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) side by side. Both companies provide risk management and insurance solutions, yet they differ in scale, geographic reach, and revenue diversification. This comparison is particularly relevant for those evaluating relative performance within the financial services industry, including portfolio managers assessing sector allocation and individual traders monitoring momentum in brokerage stocks. The analysis draws on observable market data and company fundamentals to highlight contrasts in business models and recent positioning.
Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) operates as a diversified insurance agency, wholesale brokerage, and service organization primarily focused on property, casualty, and employee benefits products. The company markets and sells insurance solutions mainly in the United States with select international presence. In recent weeks, BRO shares have tracked broader insurance brokerage sector movements amid steady demand for risk management services. Performance has been influenced by organic growth initiatives and client retention rates, with sentiment supported by consistent operational execution. Market activity reflects the company’s position as a nimble player in a consolidating industry, where acquisition activity and premium pricing trends contribute to overall stability.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) is a global professional services firm offering advisory services and insurance solutions through its Risk and Insurance Services and Consulting segments. Key operations include insurance broking via Marsh, reinsurance through Marsh Re, and consulting via Mercer and Oliver Wyman. Recent market activity for MRSH has shown resilience tied to its diversified revenue streams and international exposure. Performance in recent weeks has been shaped by client demand for risk analytics and consulting services, alongside broader economic factors affecting insurance markets. Sentiment remains influenced by the firm’s scale and ability to capture cross-segment opportunities in a complex regulatory environment.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing trends earn placement in this section. Available bots feature a range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating win rates between 55% and 75% alongside varying drawdown profiles and return metrics across different asset classes. These tools allow users to explore automated approaches tailored to specific tickers and market environments. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Brown & Brown (BRO) emphasizes a brokerage-centric model with strong U.S. market penetration, while Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH) balances insurance services with substantial consulting revenue, providing greater geographic diversification. Growth drivers for BRO center on acquisition integration and organic client expansion, contrasting with MRSH’s reliance on global risk advisory and talent management solutions. Recent momentum has favored larger-scale operators like MRSH due to revenue stability, though BRO’s focused operations can deliver agility in niche segments. Risk factors include exposure to insurance cycle fluctuations for both, with MRSH facing additional currency and regulatory considerations from its international footprint. Market sentiment reflects these differences, as investors weigh BRO’s targeted growth potential against MRSH’s broader resilience in volatile conditions.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, revenue diversification, and relative positioning within the insurance brokerage sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to Marsh & McLennan Companies (MRSH). Its larger scale and multiple revenue streams appear to support more stable performance patterns in recent market activity compared with Brown & Brown (BRO)’s more concentrated brokerage focus. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to current data points rather than forward projections.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMRSH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRSH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRO (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while MRSH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.29%.
BRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
MRSH is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| BRO | MRSH | BRO / MRSH | |
| Capitalization | 23.6B | 90.5B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 2.47B | 7.22B | 34% |
| Gain YTD | -11.206 | 3.880 | -289% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.49 | 23.16 | 97% |
| Revenue | 6.66B | 27.9B | 24% |
| Total Cash | 918M | 1.7B | 54% |
| Total Debt | 8.01B | 22.4B | 36% |
BRO | MRSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 73 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRO's Valuation (79) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (84) in the null industry. This means that BRO’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as BRO (82) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRO (73) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BRO (48) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BRO (67) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to BRO’s over the last 12 months.
| BRO | MRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 35% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRO has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRO jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRO | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| AJG - BRO | 80% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| MRSH - BRO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| WTW - BRO | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AON - BRO | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| GSHD - BRO | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRSH has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRSH jumps, then AON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| AON - MRSH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AJG - MRSH | 77% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BRO - MRSH | 75% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| WTW - MRSH | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ERIE - MRSH | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||