BX
Price
$124.81
Change
+$1.20 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 21, 02:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
150.99B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$44.90
Change
+$0.16 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 21, 02:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.11B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BX vs CG

BX vs CG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Blackstone (BX) vs. The Carlyle Group (CG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Blackstone (BX) maintains significantly larger scale with record assets under management (AUM) compared to The Carlyle Group (CG).
  • In recent weeks, BX shares have traded in a relatively contained range near $126.91, showing more stability than CG, which has experienced sharper year-to-date declines.
  • Both firms operate in alternative asset management, but Blackstone benefits from broader diversification across real estate, private equity, credit, and infrastructure.
  • BX reports Q2 2026 earnings on July 23, 2026, while CG is scheduled for August 5, 2026, setting near-term catalysts.
  • Market sentiment for Blackstone has been supported by AI-related infrastructure initiatives, contrasting with Carlyle’s more focused private equity and credit strategies.
  • Relative performance data indicates Blackstone has outperformed Carlyle on a year-to-date basis amid broader market volatility.

Introduction

Blackstone (BX) and The Carlyle Group (CG) represent two leading players in the alternative asset management sector, making them natural subjects for comparison among institutional investors, hedge fund managers, and sophisticated retail traders seeking exposure to private markets. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current environment, providing objective insights relevant to those evaluating sector rotation, portfolio diversification, or momentum-based strategies. The comparison draws on verifiable market data and developments from recent weeks to highlight contrasts without speculation.

BX Overview and Recent Performance

Blackstone Inc. (BX) is the world’s largest alternative asset manager, overseeing substantial fee-earning AUM across real estate, private equity, credit, and infrastructure strategies. In recent market activity, shares have consolidated within a range of approximately $113 to $129, closing near $126.91 as of mid-July 2026 and remaining roughly flat over the trailing 30 days. Year-to-date performance shows a decline of around 15-16%, though this compares favorably to broader benchmarks in certain periods. Sentiment has been influenced by intra-quarter realization revenue estimates exceeding $500 million for Q2 2026 and expansion into AI infrastructure, including partnerships focused on implementation rather than model development. The stock trades below its 200-day moving average, reflecting consolidation after earlier volatility, with upcoming Q2 earnings on July 23, 2026, expected to provide further clarity on fee-related earnings growth.

CG Overview and Recent Performance

The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) is a global alternative asset manager with a primary emphasis on private equity, credit, and real assets strategies. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited greater weakness than peers in the sector, contributing to year-to-date declines exceeding 20% in available comparisons. Shares have faced pressure from softer quarterly results earlier in the year and anticipation surrounding the Q2 2026 earnings release scheduled for August 5, 2026. Performance metrics indicate underperformance relative to larger competitors amid ongoing market volatility, with the firm maintaining a more concentrated platform compared to diversified peers. Recent activity centers on core strategies without notable AI or infrastructure catalysts highlighted in the same timeframe, resulting in more pronounced share price sensitivity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section, based on factors including trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker coverage. Available bots display varied win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles, often ranging across multiple asset classes with documented historical metrics. This resource allows users to explore automated strategies tailored to different risk tolerances and market environments. Explore the full selection at the Trending AI Robots page for detailed bot profiles and performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Blackstone (BX) operates at substantially greater scale with broader diversification across asset classes, providing more stable fee-related earnings potential compared to Carlyle (CG)’s more focused private equity and credit orientation. Recent momentum favors BX, with contained trading ranges and supportive catalysts such as AI infrastructure deals, while CG has shown sharper drawdowns and lagged on a year-to-date basis. Risk factors for both include sensitivity to interest rates, deal flow, and realization timing, though Blackstone’s larger platform may offer greater resilience. Sector exposure overlaps in alternatives, yet Blackstone’s infrastructure and real estate tilt contrasts with Carlyle’s credit emphasis. Market sentiment reflects these differences, with analyst coverage noting more frequent positive notes on scale advantages for the larger firm amid current conditions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in fee-related earnings, platform scale, and relative positioning amid recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Blackstone (BX) over The Carlyle Group (CG) for sustained momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BX vs. CG commentary
Jul 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BX is a StrongBuy and CG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2026
Stock price -- (BX: $123.61 vs. CG: $44.74)
Brand notoriety: BX and CG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BX: 86% vs. CG: 40%
Market capitalization -- BX: $150.99B vs. CG: $16.11B
BX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $150.99B. CG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $16.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BX and CG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BX and CG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BX (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.29% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

BX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

CG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BX($151B) has a higher market cap than CG($16.1B). BX (31.69) and CG (30.65) have similar P/E ratio . BX YTD gains are higher at: -18.123 vs. CG (-23.262). BX (14.2B) and CG (14.6B) have identical debt. BX has higher revenues than CG: BX (12.6B) vs CG (2.9B).
BXCGBX / CG
Capitalization151B16.1B938%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.123-23.26278%
P/E Ratio31.6930.65103%
Revenue12.6B2.9B435%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.2B14.6B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BX vs CG: Fundamental Ratings
BX
CG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
156
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7385
SMR RATING
1..100
2970
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8718
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BX's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (14). This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BX's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (85). This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

BX's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (70). This means that BX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

BX's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (62). This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BX (87). This means that CG’s stock grew significantly faster than BX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXCG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSXY87.415.96
+7.32%
Victoria'S Secret & Co.
YI3.850.08
+2.12%
111 Inc
LILAK7.31-0.02
-0.27%
Liberty Latin America Ltd
ESOA15.92-0.08
-0.50%
Energy Services of America Corp
GS1055.03-10.19
-0.96%
Goldman Sachs Group

BX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BX
1D Price
Change %
BX100%
-2.60%
KKR - BX
83%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
APO - BX
81%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
ARES - BX
78%
Closely correlated
-3.51%
CG - BX
76%
Closely correlated
-2.89%
TPG - BX
75%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
More

CG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CG has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CG
1D Price
Change %
CG100%
-2.89%
TPG - CG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
KKR - CG
76%
Closely correlated
-3.93%
BX - CG
75%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
BN - CG
73%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
STEP - CG
70%
Closely correlated
-2.99%
More