CASH
Price
$88.24
Change
+$0.54 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRME
Price
$43.14
Change
-$0.10 (-0.23%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs FRME

CASH vs FRME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pathward Financial (CASH) vs. First Merchants Corporation (FRME) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Pathward Financial (CASH) and First Merchants Corporation (FRME) represent two distinct banking models — a partner-focused national platform bank versus a traditional Midwestern regional bank.
  • CASH has delivered stronger year-to-date price appreciation of roughly 25% in 2026, compared to approximately 18% for FRME over the same period.
  • FRME offers a significantly higher dividend yield of around 3.55%, versus CASH's modest 0.22%, making it more attractive for income-focused investors.
  • Both companies face credit quality headwinds — CASH with rising nonperforming loans and FRME with two notable commercial loan downgrades in Q2 2026.
  • FRME recently completed the transformative acquisition of First Savings Financial Group, adding approximately $2.4 billion in assets, while CASH continues to execute an aggressive share buyback program.
  • CASH trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of approximately 11, compared to FRME's roughly 12-14x, though their business models and risk profiles differ materially.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the U.S. financial sector often face a choice between niche, high-margin specialty banks and diversified regional banking franchises. This comparison between CASH (Pathward Financial, Inc.) and FRME (First Merchants Corporation) captures that dynamic precisely. Pathward operates as a national banking platform enabling partner solutions — from prepaid cards to commercial finance — while First Merchants is one of the largest financial holding companies headquartered in Indiana, offering traditional community and commercial banking across the Midwest. Both stocks have drawn attention in recent months for different reasons: CASH for its aggressive capital return strategy and net interest margin (NIM) strength, and FRME for its transformative acquisition and post-merger integration story. This article provides a data-driven stock comparison across business models, recent performance, and market positioning.

CASH Overview and Recent Performance

Pathward Financial, Inc., trading under the ticker CASH, is a Sioux Falls, South Dakota-based financial holding company that operates through its national bank subsidiary, Pathward, N.A. Formerly known as Meta Financial Group, the company rebranded in 2022 and has positioned itself as a "trusted platform" enabling partners across two primary business lines: Partner Solutions (which includes prepaid cards, payment processing, and tax services) and Commercial Finance (term lending, asset-based lending, equipment finance, and warehouse finance).

In recent months, CASH has demonstrated notable relative performance, with the stock gaining approximately 25% year-to-date through late July 2026 and roughly 15% over the trailing twelve-month period. The company's net interest margin remains a standout metric — reported at 7.43% in the most recent fiscal third quarter (or 5.98% on an adjusted basis when including rate-related processing expenses), well above what most traditional banks produce. However, the stock has not been without headwinds. A financial restatement process related to accounting treatment of certain third-party lending relationships created uncertainty earlier in the period, and nonperforming loans and leases rose to 1.49% of the portfolio, up from 0.96% a year earlier. On the positive side, management has aggressively repurchased shares — approximately 604,000 shares in a single recent quarter alone — and the company has guided for fiscal 2026 earnings per share (EPS) in the $8.25 to $8.75 range. With a trailing P/E ratio near 11 and a market capitalization of approximately $1.87 billion, CASH trades at a relatively modest earnings multiple compared to the broader regional banking sector.

FRME Overview and Recent Performance

First Merchants Corporation, listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under FRME, is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana. Through its full-service bank charter, First Merchants Bank, the company provides commercial and consumer banking, treasury management, and private wealth advisory services across Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan — now encompassing 126 banking centers following the February 2026 completion of the First Savings Financial Group acquisition.

That acquisition has been the dominant narrative for FRME in recent market activity. The all-stock transaction, valued at approximately $241 million at announcement, added roughly $2.4 billion in assets and expanded the franchise into Southern Indiana and the Louisville metropolitan statistical area (MSA). Post-acquisition, First Merchants' total assets reached approximately $21.3 billion, with $15.5 billion in loans and $16.8 billion in deposits. The integration was completed during the second quarter of 2026, and management has indicated that cost synergies remain on track. However, FRME's most recent earnings report was marred by two commercial loan downgrades that triggered a $33 million provision for credit losses (PCL), pushing quarterly EPS down to $0.70 — well below analyst estimates. Excluding acquisition-related costs, adjusted pre-tax, pre-provision earnings rose 7.5% sequentially to $84.6 million, and the net interest margin expanded to 3.38%. For income-oriented investors, FRME's dividend yield of approximately 3.55% is a distinguishing feature. Year-to-date, the stock has risen roughly 18%, closing near $43 in late July 2026, with analysts at Piper Sandler maintaining an Overweight rating and a $51 price target.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where comparing financial stocks demands processing vast amounts of data — from earnings reports and NIM trends to credit metrics and acquisition synergies — AI-powered trading tools are increasingly being used by investors to identify opportunities. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a pool of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those bots that demonstrate the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These AI robots vary considerably in their trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — some are designed for short-term swing trading, while others focus on longer-term trend following. Performance statistics and win rates differ across bots, and each bot operates with its own distinct set of traded tickers. For traders seeking to complement their own stock comparison research with data-driven, algorithmically generated signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page may offer a useful perspective.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When placed side by side, CASH and FRME illustrate the difference between a specialty national banking platform and a traditional regional banking franchise. CASH operates with a significantly higher net interest margin — its adjusted NIM of nearly 6% dwarfs FRME's 3.38% — reflecting its focus on higher-yielding niche lending verticals such as equipment finance, asset-based lending, and warehouse finance, alongside fee-generating partner services. FRME, by contrast, relies on a more conventional spread-based model, funding commercial and industrial (C&I) loans, commercial real estate, and consumer lending with a predominantly core deposit base.

In terms of scale, FRME is the larger institution by a wide margin, with total assets exceeding $21 billion compared to CASH's more modest balance sheet. Yet CASH has been the more aggressive buyer of its own stock, using its capital-light model to return significant cash to shareholders via repurchases — a factor that has supported EPS growth even when net income has declined. FRME's capital return strategy is more balanced between dividends and buybacks, and its 3.55% dividend yield is a clear differentiator for income-seeking investors.

On credit quality, both banks face near-term challenges. CASH has experienced a rise in nonperforming loans to 1.49% of its portfolio, up meaningfully from sub-1% levels a year ago. FRME's recent provisions were driven by two specific commercial credits rather than broad deterioration, but the impact on quarterly earnings was significant. Neither bank appears to be facing systemic credit deterioration, but both warrant monitoring.

From a relative performance standpoint, CASH has outperformed FRME year-to-date (approximately 25% versus 18%), though FRME's post-acquisition scale and synergy potential could alter that trajectory in the second half of 2026. CASH's forward P/E is lower in absolute terms, but FRME's valuation may compress further if cost synergies from the First Savings integration materialize as expected.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and the nature of each company's catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely lean toward CASH in the current market environment. CASH's combination of superior net interest margin, aggressive share repurchases that mechanically boost EPS, and a cleaner post-restatement outlook provides more near-term trend consistency. The stock's higher year-to-date momentum and stronger one-year return suggest algorithmic models would detect more favorable trend signals in CASH compared to FRME, which is still absorbing a major acquisition and managing through credit-related earnings volatility. That said, FRME's higher dividend yield, larger scale, and tangible synergy-driven earnings potential — once the credit noise subsides — could shift the AI's probabilistic preference over a longer evaluation horizon. The AI verdict is not a declaration of superiority but rather a reflection of which stock currently exhibits the more consistent alignment of price trend, fundamental catalysts, and reduced near-term uncertainty.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
VS
CASH vs. FRME commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a StrongBuy and FRME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CASH: $88.24 vs. FRME: $43.14)
Brand notoriety: CASH and FRME are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 53% vs. FRME: 50%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.86B vs. FRME: $2.68B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. FRME’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRME’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRME is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRME’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRME’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than FRME.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.72% price change this week, while FRME (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

FRME is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRME($2.68B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.86B). FRME has higher P/E ratio than CASH: FRME (13.87) vs CASH (11.04). CASH YTD gains are higher at: 24.428 vs. FRME (18.553). CASH has less debt than FRME: CASH (59.5M) vs FRME (1.5B). FRME (692M) and CASH (685M) have equivalent revenues.
CASHFRMECASH / FRME
Capitalization1.86B2.68B69%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.42818.553132%
P/E Ratio11.0413.8780%
Revenue685M692M99%
Total CashN/A98.1M-
Total Debt59.5M1.5B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs FRME: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
FRME
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4267
SMR RATING
1..100
2842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3820
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRME's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FRME’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

FRME's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FRME’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

FRME's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (38) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FRME’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHFRME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OVL55.940.48
+0.87%
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
CAMX35.340.07
+0.21%
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
CGIE36.93-0.01
-0.03%
Capital Group International Equity ETF
MAGC20.67-0.01
-0.05%
Roundhill China Magnificent Seven ETF
BTCI27.98-0.69
-2.39%
NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with AMAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then AMAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
AMAL - CASH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRME - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SSB - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BY - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More

FRME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRME has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRME jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRME
1D Price
Change %
FRME100%
-0.23%
EFSC - FRME
87%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
BY - FRME
85%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
MBWM - FRME
85%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
UBSI - FRME
85%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FULT - FRME
85%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
More