AMAL
Price
$48.15
Change
+$0.31 (+0.65%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.41B
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CASH
Price
$74.00
Change
+$0.28 (+0.38%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.5B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs CASH

AMAL vs CASH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. CASH commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Buy and CASH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs CASH: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
CASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1155
SMR RATING
1..100
2016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4076
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CASH's Valuation (70) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (16) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (20) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (76) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (57) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALCASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAL: $47.84 vs. CASH: $73.72)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and CASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 120% vs. CASH: 146%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $1.41B vs. CASH: $1.5B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.41B. CASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while CASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the short-term than CASH.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.33% price change this week, while CASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
AMAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INGM27.790.98
+3.66%
Ingram Micro Holding Corp
USNA14.37-0.10
-0.69%
USANA Health Sciences
ABT96.69-2.14
-2.17%
Abbott Laboratories
ZONE0.13N/A
-2.39%
CleanCore Solutions
IMTX8.44-0.34
-3.87%
Immatics NV

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
+0.57%
BY - AMAL
79%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
STBA - AMAL
78%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
FULT - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
EFSC - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
QCRH - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with ONB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then ONB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+3.63%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
AMAL - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
FRME - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
SSB - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
INDB - CASH
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
More