AMAL
Price
$49.38
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CASH
Price
$88.24
Change
+$0.54 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMAL vs CASH

AMAL vs CASH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) vs. Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) operate in different corners of the U.S. financial services sector — AMAL as a mission-driven commercial bank and CASH as a payments-oriented financial platform — making their comparison a study in contrasting business models.
  • AMAL has delivered standout momentum in recent months, posting record profitability in its most recent quarter, raising full-year guidance, and generating a year-to-date share price gain that significantly outpaces the broader market.
  • CASH offers a higher net interest margin (NIM) and stronger return on tangible common equity (ROTCE), but faces headwinds from rising nonperforming loans and some portfolio restructuring after the sale of its Insurance Premium Finance business.
  • Analyst consensus tilts more favorably toward CASH with a "Buy" rating and a double-digit upside price target, while AMAL carries a "Hold" rating but continues to exceed earnings expectations.
  • Both companies maintain active share repurchase programs, signaling management confidence, though their capital return strategies differ — AMAL emphasizes its growing dividend while CASH prioritizes aggressive buybacks.
  • Risk profiles diverge meaningfully: AMAL's concentrated multifamily commercial real estate exposure and political deposit seasonality contrast with CASH's consumer credit normalization and partnership-reliant revenue streams.

Introduction

Investors evaluating opportunities in the U.S. financial sector frequently encounter a wide spectrum of institutions — from traditional community banks to specialized financial platforms. AMAL (Amalgamated Financial Corp.) and CASH (Pathward Financial, Inc.) represent two distinct approaches to banking and financial services. AMAL operates as the holding company for Amalgamated Bank, a century-old institution with deep ties to political, labor, and philanthropic organizations. CASH, formerly known as Meta Financial Group, functions as a payments and lending platform serving partners across consumer and commercial segments nationwide. This stock comparison examines how these differently positioned companies are navigating the current rate environment, what recent performance trends reveal about their relative strength, and which factors might shape their trajectories going forward.

AMAL Overview and Recent Performance

AMAL serves as the bank holding company for Amalgamated Bank, a full-service commercial bank and chartered trust company headquartered in New York City. Founded in 1923, the institution has carved out a differentiated niche by serving political campaigns, labor unions, non-profits, and mission-aligned businesses — a deposit franchise that management describes as one of the most distinctive in American banking. In recent weeks, AMAL shares have traded near the top of their 52-week range, reflecting a year-to-date advance of roughly 46% that has substantially outpaced the broader market. The stock's climb was reinforced by the company's second-quarter 2026 earnings release, which featured record net income of $34.8 million, record core net income of $33.1 million, and a core return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE — a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital) exceeding 16%. Net interest margin (NIM — the spread between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits) expanded to 3.78%, while on-balance-sheet deposits reached a record $8.5 billion, including political deposits that surpassed prior-cycle peaks at $2.1 billion. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance for both net interest income and core pre-tax, pre-provision earnings, citing confidence in sustained balance sheet momentum. The CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) capital ratio — a key measure of a bank's financial strength — stood at 14.20%, well above regulatory requirements.

CASH Overview and Recent Performance

CASH, Pathward Financial, Inc., is a financial holding company based in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, operating through three segments: Consumer, Commercial, and Corporate Services/Other. The Consumer segment collaborates with partners to provide payment solutions, prepaid cards, and lending products, while the Commercial segment focuses on term lending, asset-based lending, factoring, and warehouse finance. For its fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, Pathward reported net income of $185.9 million and earnings per diluted share of $7.87, achieving a return on average assets of 2.46% and a return on average tangible equity of 38.75%. The company's NIM reached 7.46% in the fiscal fourth quarter — an exceptionally high figure reflecting its asset mix and partnership-driven funding model. In recent trading, CASH shares have moved in a range that places them below their 52-week high but still reflecting a healthy year-to-date gain. The company has been actively reshaping its portfolio, completing the sale of its Insurance Premium Finance business and a transportation portfolio while continuing to return capital through an aggressive share repurchase program. Analyst sentiment remains constructive, with a consensus "Buy" rating and an average price target implying double-digit upside. However, rising nonperforming loans — which reached 1.49% of the portfolio as of mid-2025 — represent a metric that warrants monitoring. The company has guided for fiscal 2026 EPS (earnings per share) in the range of $8.25 to $8.75, assuming limited Federal Reserve rate activity.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating opportunities like AMAL and CASH, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. With hundreds of AI trading bots available on the platform — collectively trading thousands of different tickers across multiple timeframes and strategies — only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a spot in this featured section. The bots span a wide spectrum of trading styles, including swing trading, trend following, and intraday momentum strategies, with historical performance statistics such as annualized returns, win rates, and maximum drawdown figures displayed transparently for each bot. Some bots specialize in financial sector stocks, making them potentially relevant for those following AMAL and CASH. Each bot operates with a distinct set of parameters, risk profiles, and ticker universes, allowing traders to match automated strategies to their individual objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which AI-driven approaches are currently resonating with real-time market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both AMAL and CASH operate under the broad umbrella of U.S. financial services, their business models diverge sharply. AMAL functions as a traditional commercial bank with a mission-oriented deposit base, generating revenue primarily through net interest income on loans and securities. Its lending portfolio is heavily weighted toward commercial and industrial (C&I) loans, multifamily mortgages, and commercial real estate (CRE), with a growing PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) assessment portfolio adding a differentiated green-lending dimension. CASH, by contrast, operates more as a financial platform, deriving significant revenue from partner-driven payment solutions, prepaid card programs, and specialized commercial lending — a model that produces a far higher NIM but also introduces dependency on third-party relationships and regulatory frameworks around consumer financial products.

On growth metrics, AMAL currently exhibits stronger sequential momentum. The bank's record-setting second quarter, upward guidance revision, and deposit inflows that exceeded even the prior presidential election cycle peak suggest a franchise hitting its stride. Core ROTCE of 16.51% and a sub-50% efficiency ratio underscore improving operating leverage. CASH, meanwhile, is navigating a transitional phase — divesting non-core businesses while working through elevated nonperforming loan levels. Its FY2026 EPS guidance of $8.25–$8.75 represents solid growth off a strong FY2025 base, but the path to achieving it depends partly on credit normalization and successful redeployment of capital from divested portfolios.

Valuation presents an interesting contrast. CASH trades at a lower price-to-earnings multiple (approximately 11x versus AMAL's roughly 13x) and carries a more favorable analyst consensus. AMAL's higher multiple may reflect the market's appreciation for its recent earnings momentum and deposit franchise durability. Dividend investors would note that AMAL offers a more meaningful yield at approximately 1.36%, compared to CASH's modest 0.22% yield, though CASH has been more aggressive in returning capital through buybacks. Risk factors also differ: AMAL's concentrated multifamily CRE exposure — at over 200% of total risk-based capital — and reliance on cyclical political deposits introduce specific vulnerabilities, while CASH's consumer credit exposure and partnership concentration represent a separate risk profile.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely tilt in favor of AMAL in the current environment. The combination of record profitability, expanding net interest margin, robust deposit growth exceeding prior-cycle peaks, and an upward guidance revision creates a compelling near-term trend profile that algorithmic models tend to favor. AMAL's CET1 ratio of 14.20% and strong liquidity coverage — with cash, borrowing capacity, and unpledged securities covering 100% of uninsured deposits — also signal balance sheet resilience that AI systems typically weight favorably. CASH offers attractive attributes including a superior NIM, aggressive capital return, and a lower valuation multiple, but the transitional nature of its portfolio restructuring and the upward trajectory in nonperforming loans introduce elements of uncertainty that may give quantitative models pause. That said, CASH's "Buy" analyst consensus and double-digit price target upside suggest that human analysts see value the market has not yet fully priced in. The divergence between AMAL's operational momentum and CASH's valuation appeal highlights why this comparison offers a useful lens for understanding how different financial business models are performing in the current cycle.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMAL vs. CASH commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Buy and CASH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AMAL: $49.38 vs. CASH: $88.24)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and CASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 51% vs. CASH: 53%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $1.48B vs. CASH: $1.86B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.48B. CASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCASH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMAL is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CASH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AMAL and CASH are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while CASH (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CASH($1.86B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($1.48B). AMAL has higher P/E ratio than CASH: AMAL (13.17) vs CASH (11.04). AMAL YTD gains are higher at: 55.474 vs. CASH (24.428). CASH has less debt than AMAL: CASH (59.5M) vs AMAL (81.1M). CASH has higher revenues than AMAL: CASH (685M) vs AMAL (344M).
AMALCASHAMAL / CASH
Capitalization1.48B1.86B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD55.47424.428227%
P/E Ratio13.1711.04119%
Revenue344M685M50%
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt81.1M59.5M136%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs CASH: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
CASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1142
SMR RATING
1..100
4428
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1738
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMAL's Valuation (78) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's SMR Rating (28) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (38) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALCASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMAL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTT76.931.88
+2.51%
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Trs
NOWL5.240.11
+2.14%
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
MODL51.060.12
+0.24%
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
CANC40.60-0.71
-1.72%
Tema Oncology ETF
COIG3.90-1.09
-21.82%
Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
-0.02%
STBA - AMAL
80%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
FULT - AMAL
78%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
OSBC - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
IBCP - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
TRMK - AMAL
77%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with AMAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then AMAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
AMAL - CASH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRME - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SSB - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BY - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More