CASH
Price
$88.24
Change
+$0.54 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SSB
Price
$105.09
Change
-$0.17 (-0.16%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
10.19B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs SSB

CASH vs SSB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pathward Financial (CASH) vs. SouthState Corporation (SSB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Pathward Financial (CASH) is a specialized financial platform company with a strong payments ecosystem, serving partners nationwide, while SouthState Corporation (SSB) is a $10 billion regional banking powerhouse that has grown substantially through strategic acquisitions.
  • CASH has demonstrated exceptional profitability metrics, including a return on average tangible equity (ROTCE, a measure of profitability relative to tangible shareholder capital) of 38.75% in its most recent fiscal year, while SSB has delivered accelerating earnings momentum driven by its successful integration of Independent Bank Group.
  • Both stocks currently trade at similar price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples of approximately 11, yet their business models, growth strategies, and risk profiles differ materially.
  • SSB offers a meaningfully higher dividend yield of approximately 2.5% compared to CASH's modest 0.22%, appealing to income-oriented investors.
  • Year-to-date in 2026, CASH has posted a gain of roughly 25%, while SSB has delivered a comparable or slightly stronger return, reflecting broad investor confidence in both names.
  • Credit quality trends and the interest rate environment remain key variables for both institutions, though their exposure and sensitivity differ based on asset mix and liability structure.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the U.S. financial sector frequently encounter a diverse landscape of institutions that vary dramatically in size, strategy, and risk profile. This comparison examines two distinct players: CASH — Pathward Financial, a Sioux Falls-based financial platform company with a nationwide payments and lending ecosystem — and SSB — SouthState Corporation, a Winter Haven, Florida-based regional bank that has grown into one of the largest financial institutions in the Southeastern United States and beyond. Though both operate within the banking industry, their business models diverge meaningfully, offering contrasting exposures to the economy and interest rate cycles. This analysis provides a data-driven, side-by-side review for traders and investors seeking to understand how these two names compare in the current market environment.

CASH Overview and Recent Performance

Pathward Financial operates through three primary segments: Consumer, Commercial, and Corporate Services. Its Consumer segment — notably the Partner Solutions business line — collaborates with a broad network of partners to deliver payment and lending products nationwide, including prepaid card programs and tax-related financial services. This platform-oriented model differentiates CASH from traditional community and regional banks.

In recent weeks, CASH shares have traded in the high-$80s range, with a 52-week span between approximately $66 and $101. The stock has gained roughly 25% year-to-date in 2026, reflecting investor appreciation for the company's execution. In its most recent fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, Pathward delivered net income of $185.9 million, or $7.87 per diluted share, representing year-over-year earnings growth. The company's net interest margin (NIM, which measures the difference between interest income earned and interest paid) expanded meaningfully during the period, reaching 7.46% in the fiscal fourth quarter, driven by balance sheet optimization and an improved earning-asset mix. Management has guided for fiscal 2026 earnings per share of $8.25 to $8.75, supported by continued share repurchases and strategic portfolio adjustments, including the completed sale of its insurance premium finance business.

SSB Overview and Recent Performance

SouthState Corporation is a bank holding company that provides retail and commercial banking, mortgage lending, wealth management, and trust services through its wholly owned bank subsidiary. Following its transformative acquisition of Independent Bank Group — which closed on January 1, 2025 — SouthState expanded its geographic footprint into Texas and Colorado, meaningfully scaling its balance sheet and revenue base. This acquisition reshaped the company's earnings profile.

SSB shares have recently traded around $105, with a 52-week range spanning roughly $84 to $108. The stock has performed strongly in 2026, supported by robust quarterly results. In the fourth quarter of calendar 2025, SouthState reported adjusted diluted earnings per share of $2.47, a 28% increase year-over-year, on total revenues of $686.9 million — up more than 52% from the prior-year quarter. Loan and deposit growth accelerated to an 8% annualized pace, with record loan production of $3.9 billion. Net interest margin held steady at approximately 3.86%. Management highlighted the successful completion of integration milestones, an 11% dividend increase to $0.60 per share quarterly, and a new 5.56-million-share repurchase authorization as evidence of confidence in the forward trajectory.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like CASH and SSB, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of automated trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those with the strongest alignment to prevailing market conditions earn placement in this featured section. The available bots span a wide range of trading styles — from swing trading and trend-following to short-term pattern recognition — operating across 5-minute, 15-minute, and 60-minute timeframes. Some of the top-performing AI agents have posted annualized returns exceeding 100%, with win rates ranging from approximately 55% to over 67%, depending on strategy and market conditions. Each bot carries its own statistical profile, including metrics such as Sharpe ratio, maximum drawdown, and profit factor. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors identify automated strategies that match their risk tolerance and trading objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both companies operate under bank holding company structures, the contrasts between them are striking. Pathward Financial runs a lean, asset-light model centered on payments and partner-driven lending — its returns on equity and tangible equity substantially exceed those of most traditional banks. However, this model also brings concentration risk: a significant portion of its noninterest income is tied to tax season activity, creating seasonal earnings patterns. Its NIM of over 7% reflects a high-yielding loan portfolio, but also carries corresponding credit risk — nonperforming loans rose to 1.49% of the portfolio as of mid-2025, warranting ongoing monitoring.

SouthState, by contrast, is a traditional super-regional bank where scale, deposit relationships, and commercial lending drive performance. With $48 billion in loans and $55 billion in deposits, SSB benefits from a low-cost deposit base (total deposit costs around 1.82% in the most recent quarter) and a broadly diversified loan book. Its NIM of roughly 3.86% is considerably lower than CASH's, but the business is supported by a larger noninterest income stream from correspondent banking, capital markets, and wealth management. SSB's efficiency ratio — the proportion of revenue consumed by expenses — has improved to approximately 50%, indicating strong cost discipline. Meanwhile, net charge-offs have remained well-contained at just 0.09% of average loans in the most recent quarter.

From a market sentiment perspective, both stocks have attracted positive attention, but SSB's larger market capitalization, higher trading liquidity, and stronger dividend profile may appeal to institutional and income-focused investors, while CASH's higher growth profile and differentiated model may resonate with those seeking niche financial exposure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors currently shaping the market landscape, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward SSB in the present environment, though this assessment carries no certainty. Several converging signals support this tilt: SSB has demonstrated accelerating organic loan and deposit growth following a transformative acquisition, earnings momentum has been sequentially improving quarter-over-quarter, and the company's capital return program — combining a meaningful dividend increase with active share repurchases — signals management confidence. Furthermore, SSB's diversified revenue base, including a growing capital markets division, provides multiple growth levers beyond net interest income. That said, CASH remains a compelling story with superior return metrics and a distinctive business model; an AI system would continue to monitor both names closely, recalibrating as new data on credit quality, rate sensitivity, and earnings delivery emerges. In probabilistic terms, SSB's broader momentum, integration tailwinds, and lower apparent volatility currently give it a marginal edge in an AI-driven relative assessment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CASH vs. SSB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a StrongBuy and SSB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CASH: $88.24 vs. SSB: $105.09)
Brand notoriety: CASH and SSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 53% vs. SSB: 101%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.86B vs. SSB: $10.19B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. SSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSB is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CASH and SSB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.72% price change this week, while SSB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

SSB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSB($10.2B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.86B). CASH (11.04) and SSB (11.04) have similar P/E ratio . CASH YTD gains are higher at: 24.428 vs. SSB (12.996). CASH has less debt than SSB: CASH (59.5M) vs SSB (697M). SSB has higher revenues than CASH: SSB (2.65B) vs CASH (685M).
CASHSSBCASH / SSB
Capitalization1.86B10.2B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.42812.996188%
P/E Ratio11.0411.04100%
Revenue685M2.65B26%
Total CashN/A583M-
Total Debt59.5M697M9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs SSB: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
SSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4243
SMR RATING
1..100
2816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3875
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSB's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SSB (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (28) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSB (75) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHSSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNY27.010.20
+0.75%
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
LDEM59.540.12
+0.21%
iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
DGJA31.75N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Dgt Ret ETF - Jan
QVMS34.21-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
EVLN48.35-0.03
-0.05%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with AMAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then AMAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
AMAL - CASH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRME - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SSB - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BY - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More

SSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSB has been closely correlated with AUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SSB jumps, then AUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSB
1D Price
Change %
SSB100%
-0.16%
AUB - SSB
88%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
UCB - SSB
87%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ASB - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
ONB - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
UBSI - SSB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
More