CASH
Price
$88.24
Change
+$0.54 (+0.62%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ONB
Price
$26.64
Change
+$0.23 (+0.87%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
10.19B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CASH vs ONB

CASH vs ONB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Pathward Financial (CASH) vs. Old National Bancorp (ONB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Pathward Financial (CASH) operates a niche financial platform blending commercial lending, warehouse finance, and tax services, while Old National Bancorp (ONB) is a full-scale regional bank recently expanded through its acquisition of Bremer Bank.
  • CASH delivers a significantly higher net interest margin (NIM) of over 7%, reflecting its specialty lending focus, whereas ONB's NIM has improved to roughly 3.64% following its merger integration.
  • ONB offers a compelling dividend yield above 2% with a 25-year track record of dividend growth; CASH provides a modest dividend yield but returns capital aggressively through share repurchases.
  • Both stocks have posted strong year-to-date returns in 2026, with CASH up approximately 25% and ONB up roughly 21%, though CASH has shown higher intraday and week-to-week volatility.
  • ONB's substantially larger market capitalization (around $10.3 billion) and broader deposit base offer greater liquidity and institutional coverage compared to CASH (approximately $1.87 billion), which trades with a lower daily volume and narrower analyst following.
  • The two companies represent fundamentally different exposures within the financial sector: CASH is a specialized, partner-focused financial services firm, while ONB is a traditional community and commercial banking franchise scaling through M&A (mergers and acquisitions).

Introduction

Investors comparing CASH (Pathward Financial) and ONB (Old National Bancorp) are evaluating two very different financial sector plays. Pathward Financial is a Sioux Falls-based financial holding company with a distinctive business model centered on partner-driven consumer and commercial lending, warehouse finance, and tax services. Old National Bancorp, headquartered in Evansville, Indiana, is a regional banking powerhouse that recently completed a transformative merger with Bremer Bank, significantly expanding its Midwestern footprint. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors weighing a high-margin specialty lender against a growing regional bank with scale, dividend income, and merger-driven momentum.

CASH Overview and Recent Performance

CASH (Pathward Financial, Inc.) operates through three business segments: Consumer, Commercial, and Corporate Services. The Consumer segment, which includes the company's Partner Solutions business line, collaborates with partners nationwide to deliver payment and lending products. The Commercial segment encompasses its Commercial Finance business, which helps businesses access capital through term lending, asset-based lending, factoring, SBA/USDA lending, and warehouse finance. A unique differentiator is the company's Tax Services business, which originates refund advance loans during the U.S. tax season, providing a seasonal revenue surge.

In recent weeks, CASH shares have traded near $88–$89, up approximately 25% year-to-date in 2026. The stock's 52-week range spans from roughly $65.87 to $101.26, indicating significant price swings. For its fiscal year 2025 (ended September 30, 2025), Pathward reported net income of $185.9 million, or $7.87 per diluted share, with a return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE) of 38.75%. The company's NIM of 7.46% (or 6.04% when adjusted for contractual deposit-related processing expenses) remains exceptionally high relative to traditional banks. Recent strategic moves include the sale of its insurance premium finance business and a portion of its consumer finance portfolio, reflecting ongoing balance sheet optimization. The company has also been actively repurchasing shares, reducing its outstanding count and supporting earnings per share growth. For fiscal 2026, management has guided to EPS of $8.25–$8.75.

ONB Overview and Recent Performance

ONB (Old National Bancorp) is the holding company for Old National Bank, a regional financial services firm providing consumer and commercial banking, treasury management, wealth management, mortgage lending, and insurance solutions across the Midwest. The company's strategic trajectory changed materially with the closing of its partnership with Bremer Bank on May 1, 2025, which roughly doubled its balance sheet and propelled total assets to approximately $72 billion by year-end 2025.

ONB shares have recently traded around $26–$27, with a year-to-date gain of roughly 21% in 2026. The 52-week range extends from approximately $19.39 to $27.32, and the stock recently hit an all-time high, reflecting positive market reception to the Bremer integration. In its most recent quarterly report, ONB posted adjusted EPS of $0.59 for Q3 2025 and $0.65 for Q2 2026, exceeding consensus estimates. Revenue has grown substantially, with total revenue surpassing $3.7 billion in fiscal 2025, and quarterly revenue reached approximately $733 million in mid-2026, reflecting double-digit year-over-year growth. NIM has expanded to 3.64%, aided by the Bremer acquisition and disciplined deposit cost management. The company maintains a quarterly dividend of $0.145 per share, representing an annualized yield above 2% and supported by a 25-year dividend growth streak. Analyst consensus currently rates ONB a "Moderate Buy," with a consensus price target near $29.36.

Trending AI Robots

In an environment where financial stocks can shift rapidly on interest-rate expectations, merger news, and earnings surprises, traders are increasingly turning to AI-powered tools for timely, data-driven insights. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots — chosen from hundreds of available bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers — based on their suitability for current market conditions. These AI trading bots employ diverse strategies, timeframes (from 5-minute to daily), and technical approaches, with some delivering annualized returns above 80% and win rates exceeding 70% in recent periods. Each bot has distinct performance statistics, trading styles, and sets of tickers, allowing users to find strategies aligned with their risk tolerance and market outlook. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify which automated strategies are currently best positioned for evolving financial sector dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most fundamental contrast between CASH and ONB lies in their business models. Pathward Financial operates as a specialized lending and payments platform, generating an extraordinarily high NIM of over 7% — roughly double that of Old National. This reflects CASH's focus on higher-yielding commercial finance assets such as term lending, factoring, asset-based lending, and its seasonal tax-refund advance portfolio. However, this specialization also introduces concentration risk and greater sensitivity to niche credit cycles. Nonperforming loans at CASH rose to 1.49% of the portfolio as of mid-2025, a metric worth monitoring.

Old National Bancorp, by contrast, runs a traditional diversified regional banking model. Its revenue base is broader, spanning net interest income from a $48 billion loan book, fee-based businesses such as wealth management and treasury services, and a granular low-cost deposit franchise with $55 billion in total deposits. ONB's scale — with a market capitalization roughly five times that of CASH — brings advantages in liquidity, institutional investor coverage, and dividend reliability. Its dividend yield above 2% and a P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio around 14 make it more attractive for income-oriented investors, whereas CASH, with a P/E near 11 and a smaller dividend, appeals more to investors focused on capital appreciation and share buybacks.

On recent momentum, both stocks have performed well. ONB has benefited from the successful integration of Bremer Bank, delivering sequential NIM expansion and operating leverage as merger-related costs fade. CASH has been supported by strong tax-season results, ongoing share repurchases, and balance sheet optimization. However, CASH has displayed sharper price swings — including a notable single-session drop of over 6% in late July 2026 — highlighting its higher-beta behavior relative to the steadier trajectory ONB has generally maintained in recent months.

Risk profiles also diverge. CASH faces restatement-related uncertainty, having disclosed errors in its gross-versus-net presentation and derivative accounting that delayed certain SEC filings. ONB's risks center on merger integration execution — though thus far the Bremer combination appears to be progressing smoothly — and exposure to commercial real estate within its expanded loan portfolio. For sector exposure, CASH leans toward specialty finance, while ONB provides pure-play regional banking exposure.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable market data and current conditions, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor ONB (Old National Bancorp) for its trend consistency, scale advantages, and momentum driven by tangible merger-related catalysts. ONB has demonstrated steady NIM expansion, beats on both top- and bottom-line estimates, rising institutional interest, and a more predictable earnings trajectory supported by a granular deposit base and diversified fee income. Its all-time highs and upward 50-day and 200-day moving averages reflect sustained trend strength. That said, CASH (Pathward Financial) cannot be dismissed — its exceptional NIM, capital-return program, and unique niche positioning offer a compelling value proposition for strategies emphasizing profitability metrics and mean-reversion signals, especially following periods of sharp price dislocation. The AI would likely assign ONB a higher probability score for near-term trend-following strategies, while recognizing CASH as a potentially attractive candidate for fundamentally driven, value-oriented approaches.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CASH vs. ONB commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CASH is a StrongBuy and ONB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CASH: $88.24 vs. ONB: $26.64)
Brand notoriety: CASH and ONB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CASH: 53% vs. ONB: 81%
Market capitalization -- CASH: $1.86B vs. ONB: $10.19B
CASH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.86B. ONB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileONB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ONB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ONB is a better buy in the long-term than CASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CASH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ONB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CASH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ONB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CASH is a better buy in the short-term than ONB.

Price Growth

CASH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.72% price change this week, while ONB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

CASH is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

ONB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ONB($10.2B) has a higher market cap than CASH($1.86B). ONB has higher P/E ratio than CASH: ONB (11.79) vs CASH (11.04). CASH YTD gains are higher at: 24.428 vs. ONB (20.880). CASH has less debt than ONB: CASH (59.5M) vs ONB (7.91B). ONB has higher revenues than CASH: ONB (2.82B) vs CASH (685M).
CASHONBCASH / ONB
Capitalization1.86B10.2B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.42820.880117%
P/E Ratio11.0411.7994%
Revenue685M2.82B24%
Total CashN/A537M-
Total Debt59.5M7.91B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CASH vs ONB: Fundamental Ratings
CASH
ONB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4228
SMR RATING
1..100
2816
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3858
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ONB's Valuation (45) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CASH (78) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CASH’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (28) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

ONB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CASH (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ONB’s stock grew similarly to CASH’s over the last 12 months.

CASH's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ONB (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CASH’s stock grew similarly to ONB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CASHONB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ONB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNY27.010.20
+0.75%
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
LDEM59.540.12
+0.21%
iShares® ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF
DGJA31.75N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Dgt Ret ETF - Jan
QVMS34.21-0.01
-0.04%
Invesco S&P SmallCp 600 QVM Mlt-fctr ETF
EVLN48.35-0.03
-0.05%
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate ETF

CASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CASH has been loosely correlated with AMAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CASH jumps, then AMAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CASH
1D Price
Change %
CASH100%
+0.62%
AMAL - CASH
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
FRME - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
ONB - CASH
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
SSB - CASH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
BY - CASH
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
More