Advertisement
CCEP vs FIZZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Hold and FIZZ is a Buy.
CCEP | FIZZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (77) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIZZ (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew significantly faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
FIZZ's SMR Rating (26) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that FIZZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FIZZ (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FIZZ (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | FIZZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 11 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 53% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FIZZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FIZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIZZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FIZZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -2.96% price change this week, while FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -4.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-3.07% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +1.77% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
FIZZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIZZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIZZ | 100% | -0.86% | ||
| KDP - FIZZ | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| PEP - FIZZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CCEP - FIZZ | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
| CELH - FIZZ | 28% Poorly correlated | +4.87% | ||
| COKE - FIZZ | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||