Advertisement
CCEP vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP has shown stronger recent price momentum, rallying roughly 14% in the past month and trading near its 52-week high, while PEP remains well below its 52-week high with weaker near-term momentum.
- CCEP delivered broad-based growth across zero-sugar, energy, and sports categories and reaffirmed its full-year guidance, whereas PEP beat quarterly estimates but lowered its full-year profit outlook.
- PEP offers a more defensive valuation (around 15-16x earnings) and a dividend yield above 4%, while CCEP trades at a premium multiple near the top of its historical range.
- PEP is contending with a sluggish North American business and activist-investor pressure, while CCEP faces consumer-affordability and rising-cost headwinds in Europe.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalyst positioning, the AI currently favors CCEP over PEP.
- For more detail on these tickers, explore CCEP Major News, CCEP Today's Price Move, PEP Major News, and PEP Today's Price Move.
- To see how AI trading bots are positioning across the market, explore Trending AI Robots.
Introduction
Investors weighing two of the world's most recognized beverage franchises often find themselves comparing Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP), the world's largest independent Coca-Cola bottler, and PepsiCo (PEP), a global leader in both snacks and beverages. Although both operate in the consumer staples sector, their business models, geographic exposure, and current market narratives differ meaningfully. This stock comparison examines their relative performance, growth drivers, and market positioning to help traders and longer-term investors understand which name currently presents the more favorable risk-reward profile. The analysis focuses on observable trends rather than short-term price moves, offering a neutral framework for evaluating these two large-cap staples in today's environment.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners manufactures, distributes, and sells Coca-Cola-branded beverages across Western Europe, Australia, the Pacific, and Southeast Asia. In recent weeks, CCEP has demonstrated notable strength, gaining roughly 14% over the past month and trading near its 52-week high. This rally has been supported by solid fundamentals: first-half 2026 revenue rose about 6% on a comparable, foreign-exchange-neutral basis, with operating profit up approximately 8% and diluted earnings per share (EPS) climbing more than 10%.
Growth has been broad-based, led by double-digit gains in energy, sports, and zero-sugar categories. Management reaffirmed its full-year guidance, including revenue growth of roughly 3-4% and comparable free cash flow of at least €1.7 billion, while continuing a €1 billion share buyback program. The main counterweight is valuation: CCEP trades at a forward multiple above both its sub-industry average and its own five-year median, leaving less room for execution missteps as cost pressures persist.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo is a diversified global food and beverage company whose portfolio spans Lay's, Doritos, Gatorade, Pepsi, and Quaker, among others. Recent market activity for PEP has been more challenging. The stock remains well below its 52-week high, reflecting persistent weakness in its core North American market, where beverage volumes declined and snack volumes were broadly flat in the latest quarter, even as international sales grew strongly.
In its most recent quarterly report, PepsiCo beat revenue and earnings estimates but lowered its full-year core EPS growth outlook to roughly 2.5-3.5%, down from a prior 5-7% range, as rising input costs and margin compression weighed on results. The company is investing in innovation, price competitiveness, and cost reduction to stabilize North America, with activist investor Elliott Management holding a sizable stake. On a positive note, PepsiCo trades near its lowest valuation in years and offers a dividend yield above 4%, supported by more than five decades of consecutive payout increases.
Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection of AI trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of automated strategies that trade across thousands of different tickers. Because not every bot is suited to every market regime, only the most relevant and best-performing strategies for current conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they monitor, allowing users to evaluate options across different risk profiles and holding periods. Exploring this curated list can help traders identify automated approaches that align with their own objectives and current market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The two companies occupy different positions within the beverage value chain, which shapes their risk and return profiles. CCEP is a concentrated bottler whose fortunes are tied to Coca-Cola-branded products and a largely European and Asia-Pacific footprint, giving it less direct exposure to the snack category but strong leverage to on-trend categories like energy and zero-sugar beverages. PEP, by contrast, is a diversified conglomerate spanning snacks and beverages with a heavier North American presence, offering breadth but also greater exposure to a slower-growing home market.
Growth drivers diverge sharply. CCEP's recent momentum reflects accelerating category growth, distribution gains, and disciplined margin expansion. PepsiCo's story centers on a still-unfolding North American turnaround, supported by international strength but tempered by margin pressure and a reduced earnings outlook. On valuation, PepsiCo's lower multiple and higher yield appeal to income-focused investors, while CCEP's premium multiple prices in stronger near-term execution. Market sentiment currently rewards CCEP's consistency, while PEP trades with a weaker momentum profile despite its dividend cushion.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Weighing trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalyst positioning, Tickeron's AI currently leans toward CCEP over PEP. The AI's framework tends to favor names exhibiting stronger and more persistent upward price trends, and CCEP's recent rally near its 52-week high, combined with reaffirmed guidance and broad category momentum, contrasts with PepsiCo's lower-high price structure and downward earnings revision trend. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than absolute: PepsiCo's attractive valuation and income yield could appeal under a different market regime, and both names carry their own execution risks. The relative positioning, however, currently tilts in CCEP's favor.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Hold and PEP is a Hold.
Aroon Indicator for CCEP shows an upward move is likely
CCEP's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on November 06, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 282 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In 162 of the 282 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at 57%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CCEP as a result. In 47 of 99 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 47%.
CCEP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 12, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for CCEP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 6 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 38%.
Following a +5.14% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CCEP advanced for three days, in 192 of 354 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for CCEP moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 13 of the 36 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 36%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
CCEP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 30 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CCEP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 78 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.174) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.208). P/E Ratio (26.155) is within average values for comparable stocks, (26.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.715) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.033) settles around the average of (0.038) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.873) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
PEP's RSI Oscillator leaves overbought zone
The 10-day RSI Indicator for PEP moved out of overbought territory on November 03, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. Traders may want to look at selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 instances where the indicator moved out of the overbought zone. In 18 of the 32 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move down at 56%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 4 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PEP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
PEP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PEP as a result. In 46 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 52%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PEP just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where PEP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 22 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.
PEP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PEP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 7 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 41%.
Following a +3.96% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PEP advanced for three days, in 115 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 39%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 78 of 229 cases where PEP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 34%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 20 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PEP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 70 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (8.730) is normal, around the industry mean (-3.208). P/E Ratio (18.500) is within average values for comparable stocks, (26.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.316) is also within normal values, averaging (3.732). Dividend Yield (0.042) settles around the average of (0.038) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.901) is also within normal values, averaging (2.785).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PEP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock worse than average.
CCEP | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (70) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (78) in the null industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (87) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew significantly faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as PEP (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (81) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 34% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.57% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2027.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+4.21% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.41% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| KO - CCEP | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.41% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||