Advertisement
CCEP vs PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. PepsiCo (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP has delivered stronger recent performance with positive volume growth and share buybacks, while PEP has faced steeper price declines amid softer North American demand.
- Both companies operate in the consumer defensive beverages sector, but CCEP focuses on bottling and distribution in Europe, Australasia, and Southeast Asia, whereas PEP has broader exposure including snacks and global beverages.
- CCEP reported solid first-half 2026 results with revenue growth and margin expansion, contrasting with PEP’s recent market pressure and upcoming earnings.
- Valuation metrics show CCEP trading at a higher trailing P/E compared to PEP, which offers a higher dividend yield.
- Market sentiment has favored CCEP’s operational catalysts in recent weeks, while PEP contends with consumer caution and wider 52-week declines.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs in growth stability versus income generation for investors comparing the two stocks.
Introduction
Investors and traders often compare CCEP and PEP due to their positions in the global non-alcoholic beverages industry and shared exposure to consumer spending patterns. This analysis examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning in the current environment. The comparison appeals to those seeking insights into relative performance within consumer defensive stocks, particularly those evaluating stability, dividend characteristics, and regional versus diversified operations. Data draws from recent market activity to provide a factual basis for understanding contrasts without forward projections.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC serves as a major bottler in the Coca-Cola system, operating primarily across developed Europe, Australasia, and Southeast Asia. In recent weeks, CCEP stock has shown resilience relative to broader market moves, closing at $99.77 on September 18, 2026, within a 52-week range of $84.66 to $113.67. Market capitalization stands near $43.95 billion. First-half 2026 results highlighted volume growth of 5.6% and revenue increases, supported by pricing, mix improvements, and cost management. Share buyback activity and free cash flow generation contributed to positive sentiment. The stock’s beta around 0.47 indicates lower volatility compared to the market, with performance influenced by regional consumption trends and operational efficiencies in recent market activity.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo, Inc. engages in beverages and convenient foods globally, with significant North American operations and international segments. In recent weeks, PEP stock has experienced notable declines, closing at $129.75 on September 18, 2026, near the lower end of its 52-week range of $129.55 to $171.48. Market capitalization approximates $177 billion. The company faces headwinds from softer consumer demand in key markets, contributing to downward price movement. With an upcoming earnings release scheduled for October 8, 2026, attention centers on revenue trends and margin dynamics. The stock offers a trailing dividend yield near 4.56%, providing income appeal amid price pressure. Broader market sentiment reflects caution on spending patterns affecting its diversified portfolio in recent market activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities and other assets. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing environments earn placement in the Trending section. Available bots span a wide range of performance statistics, with win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics varying by strategy, timeframe, and ticker selection. Users can explore diverse trading styles including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum approaches tailored to individual preferences. The platform emphasizes factual performance data over guarantees. For more details on these tools, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP and PEP differ markedly in scale and focus. CCEP operates as a regional bottler with concentrated exposure to Coca-Cola brands in specific geographies, enabling targeted volume and pricing strategies. PEP maintains a broader portfolio encompassing snacks and multiple beverage categories across global markets, introducing additional demand variability. Recent momentum favors CCEP through operational catalysts such as buybacks and volume gains, while PEP contends with wider price corrections tied to North American softness. Risk factors include currency exposure for CCEP and consumer discretionary pressures for PEP. Sector exposure remains defensive for both, yet CCEP exhibits lower beta and PEP delivers higher yield. Market sentiment reflects these trade-offs in relative stability versus income potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, operational catalysts, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to CCEP. Stronger volume trends and buyback execution provide clearer support compared to PEP’s demand challenges. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to available data rather than definitive outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Buy and PEP is a Buy.
CCEP | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (32) in the null industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCEP (91) in the null industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew significantly faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PEP (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PEP (81) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | PEP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 36% | 11 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 43% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +3.16% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+0.32% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | -1.85% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.60% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| KO - PEP | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||