Advertisement
CCEP vs KO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. The Coca-Cola Company (KO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 19.65 compared to KO's 25.21, suggesting relative value in the bottler.
- KO shows stronger year-to-date performance at 10.37% versus CCEP's 7.05%, driven by positive analyst upgrades.
- Both stocks exhibit solid profitability, with KO boasting a higher profit margin of 27.34% and ROE (return on equity) of 43.32%.
- CCEP announced a €1 billion share buyback and record 2025 profits, supporting recent sentiment.
- KO approaches Q1 2026 earnings with raised price targets amid emerging market growth.
- Debt-to-equity ratios are comparable at around 130-140%, indicating similar leverage exposure.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits CCEP, the leading bottler and distributor for Coca-Cola in Europe, Asia Pacific, and beyond, against its parent KO, the global beverage giant. Investors tracking the consumer staples sector, particularly those seeking exposure to non-alcoholic drinks amid shifting consumer preferences and economic volatility, will find value here. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in valuation, momentum, and strategic initiatives, aiding decisions on relative performance and positioning in portfolios focused on stability and dividends.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) operates as a bottling franchisee, manufacturing and distributing Coca-Cola products across 31 countries in Europe, Asia Pacific, and Latin America. In recent market activity, its shares have hovered around $98, with a market cap of approximately $43 billion. Year-to-date gains stand at 7.05%, reflecting resilience despite broader sector pressures. Key drivers include record 2025 results with revenue of €20.9 billion (up 2.8% YoY) and operating profit surging 31% to €2.79 billion, fueled by pricing and volume mix. A €1 billion share buyback program has bolstered shareholder returns, enhancing sentiment amid analyst targets averaging $106.89. Trading within a 52-week range of $84.66-$110.90, CCEP benefits from strong ROE (22.89%) but faces currency and regional demand risks.
KO Overview and Recent Performance
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the world's largest non-alcoholic beverage producer, owning iconic brands like Coke, Sprite, and Fanta, with a global franchise model. Shares recently closed near $76.63, supported by a $330 billion market cap. Year-to-date performance reaches 10.37%, outperforming benchmarks, while one-year returns are 8.73%. Upcoming Q1 2026 earnings anticipate $12.01 billion in sales and $0.82 EPS, with analysts like UBS raising targets to $90 on emerging market strength and dividend reliability. Within a 52-week range of $65.35-$82.00, sentiment has shifted positively via price target hikes and portfolio stability narratives. High profit margins (27.34%) and ROE (43.32%) underscore efficiency, though cost inflation poses challenges.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies. These bots employ diverse strategies, including real-time signal agents for copy trading without balance minimums, virtual agents with customizable risk management, and brokerage agents mirroring professional trades. Selected for current market conditions, they cater to various timeframes and styles, helping traders navigate volatility. Explore these bots to align with your risk tolerance and discover automated insights across sectors.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP focuses on regional bottling and distribution, exposing it to local economic cycles and FX (foreign exchange) volatility, while KO leverages global brand equity and franchising for diversified revenue. Growth drivers differ: CCEP's revenue per case improvements and buybacks contrast KO's volume-light but margin-rich expansion in emerging markets. Recent momentum favors KO YTD, but CCEP leads one-year. Risk factors include comparable debt/equity (130%+), though KO's scale offers buffering. Sector exposure is pure beverages for both, with KO enjoying stronger analyst sentiment via upgrades.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward KO for its superior profit margins, higher YTD momentum, and consistent analyst support ahead of earnings, positioning it favorably in stable consumer staples trends. CCEP offers value via lower valuation and buyback catalysts, but KO's scale and ROE edge provide probabilistic outperformance in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCEP is a Buy and KO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKO’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KO’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- KO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.82% price change this week, while KO (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
KO is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+3.67% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | KO | CCEP / KO | |
| Capitalization | 44.2B | 350B | 13% |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 19.2B | 17% |
| Gain YTD | 12.007 | 17.833 | 67% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.86 | 25.01 | 79% |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 49.3B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 12B | 43.9B | 27% |
CCEP | KO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 21 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 32 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CCEP's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as KO (52) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP’s stock grew similarly to KO’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (24) in the null industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's SMR Rating (21) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (63) in the null industry. This means that KO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (46) in the null industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
KO's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (75) in the null industry. This means that KO’s stock grew similarly to CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | KO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 31% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 34% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 39% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 40% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 41% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 38% | 15 days ago 30% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 38% |
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | N/A | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||