CCK
Price
$120.21
Change
+$2.36 (+2.00%)
Updated
Aug 3, 04:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.82B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SON
Price
$56.53
Change
+$0.17 (+0.30%)
Updated
Aug 3, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.57B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CCK vs SON

CCK vs SON Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CCK vs. SON commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCK is a Buy and SON is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CCK: $117.85 vs. SON: $56.36)
Brand notoriety: CCK and SON are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCK: 83% vs. SON: 111%
Market capitalization -- CCK: $12.82B vs. SON: $5.57B
CCK [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $12.82B. SON’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $5.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CCK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCK and SON are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SON’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CCK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SON’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CCK is a better buy in the short-term than SON.

Price Growth

CCK (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -0.03% price change this week, while SON (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -3.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCK is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

SON is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-1.73% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCK($12.8B) has a higher market cap than SON($5.57B). CCK has higher P/E ratio than SON: CCK (16.96) vs SON (8.71). SON YTD gains are higher at: 31.734 vs. CCK (15.232). CCK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.1B vs. SON (1.54B). CCK has more cash in the bank: 656M vs. SON (169M). SON has less debt than CCK: SON (4.71B) vs CCK (6.27B). CCK has higher revenues than SON: CCK (13.3B) vs SON (7.46B).
CCKSONCCK / SON
Capitalization12.8B5.57B230%
EBITDA2.1B1.54B137%
Gain YTD15.23231.73448%
P/E Ratio16.968.71195%
Revenue13.3B7.46B178%
Total Cash656M169M388%
Total Debt6.27B4.71B133%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCK vs SON: Fundamental Ratings
CCK
SON
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7894
SMR RATING
1..100
3649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SON's Valuation (15) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as CCK (46). This means that SON’s stock grew similarly to CCK’s over the last 12 months.

CCK's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (94). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.

CCK's SMR Rating (36) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (49). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.

CCK's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (43). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.

CCK's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as SON (100). This means that CCK’s stock grew similarly to SON’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCKSON
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CCK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SON
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGO28.820.48
+1.71%
MIG Core ETF
COMB25.89N/A
N/A
GraniteShares Blmbrg CmdtyBrdStr NoK1ETF
UJB77.95-0.01
-0.01%
ProShares Ultra High Yield
IUSB45.45-0.09
-0.21%
iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
RSPH34.76-0.15
-0.43%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Hlth Care ETF

CCK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCK has been loosely correlated with BALL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCK jumps, then BALL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCK
1D Price
Change %
CCK100%
-0.44%
BALL - CCK
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
AVY - CCK
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
SLGN - CCK
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
GEF - CCK
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
AMCR - CCK
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More

SON and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SON has been loosely correlated with GEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SON jumps, then GEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SON
1D Price
Change %
SON100%
-0.81%
GEF - SON
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
CCK - SON
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
AVY - SON
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
AMCR - SON
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
SLGN - SON
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
More