CDNAF
Price
$107.08
Change
+$1.69 (+1.60%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
KMX
Price
$83.67
Change
-$0.60 (-0.71%)
Updated
Dec 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
108 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CDNAF vs KMX

Header iconCDNAF vs KMX Comparison
Open Charts CDNAF vs KMXBanner chart's image
Canadian Tire
Price$107.08
Change+$1.69 (+1.60%)
Volume$16.48K
CapitalizationN/A
CarMax
Price$83.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.71%)
Volume$17.98K
CapitalizationN/A
CDNAF vs KMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CDNAF vs. KMX commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDNAF is a Hold and KMX is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (CDNAF: $107.08 vs. KMX: $84.27)
Brand notoriety: CDNAF and KMX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDNAF: 501% vs. KMX: 216%
Market capitalization -- CDNAF: $8B vs. KMX: $13.76B
CDNAF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $8B. KMX’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $13.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDNAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KMX is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDNAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KMX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMX is a better buy in the short-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while KMX (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

KMX is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.69% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMX($13.8B) has a higher market cap than CDNAF($8B). KMX has higher P/E ratio than CDNAF: KMX (27.46) vs CDNAF (12.22). KMX YTD gains are higher at: 9.812 vs. CDNAF (0.833). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. KMX (1.61B). KMX has more cash in the bank: 605M vs. CDNAF (489M). CDNAF has less debt than KMX: CDNAF (8.38B) vs KMX (19.5B). KMX has higher revenues than CDNAF: KMX (26.6B) vs CDNAF (17.7B).
CDNAFKMXCDNAF / KMX
Capitalization8B13.8B58%
EBITDA2.22B1.61B138%
Gain YTD0.8339.8128%
P/E Ratio12.2227.4645%
Revenue17.7B26.6B67%
Total Cash489M605M81%
Total Debt8.38B19.5B43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDNAF vs KMX: Fundamental Ratings
CDNAF
KMX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6279
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5627
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9728
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMX (80) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew significantly faster than KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMX (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as KMX (79) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to KMX’s over the last 12 months.

KMX's Price Growth Rating (27) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CDNAF (56) in the null industry. This means that KMX’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

KMX's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (97) in the null industry. This means that KMX’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDNAFKMX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CDNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCREX14.560.23
+1.61%
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Inv C
AULDX102.321.07
+1.06%
American Century Ultra® R6
UICGX12.740.09
+0.71%
Victory Capital Growth Institutional
IMAAX9.280.04
+0.43%
Delaware Ivy Multi-Asset Income A
SFNNX10.270.02
+0.23%
Schwab Fundamental Intl Equity Index Fd

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+1.61%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
More

KMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMX has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMX jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMX
1D Price
Change %
KMX100%
+0.05%
PAG - KMX
70%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
ABG - KMX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
CWH - KMX
63%
Loosely correlated
+5.03%
LAD - KMX
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
GPI - KMX
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More