CF
Price
$118.30
Change
+$1.25 (+1.07%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
17.9B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IPI
Price
$36.62
Change
+$0.64 (+1.78%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
492.78M
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CF vs IPI

CF vs IPI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CF Industries (CF) vs. Intrepid Potash (IPI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CF Industries Holdings (CF) is a global nitrogen fertilizer giant with a market capitalization of approximately $18.4 billion, while Intrepid Potash (IPI) is a niche potash and Trio® producer valued at roughly $375–500 million — a stark difference in scale and market influence.
  • CF generated $1.46 billion in net earnings and $2.89 billion in adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) for full-year 2025, whereas IPI reported net income of $11.2 million and adjusted EBITDA of $63.1 million over the same period.
  • IPI benefits from a debt-free balance sheet with approximately $83.5 million in cash, while CF maintains significant leverage but also massive free cash flow generation — approximately $1.79 billion in 2025.
  • CF's diversified nitrogen product portfolio and low-carbon ammonia initiatives provide multiple growth catalysts, while IPI's narrower potash and Trio® focus is complemented by an emerging lithium byproduct opportunity.
  • Both companies benefit from constructive global fertilizer market dynamics, including tight nitrogen supply and supportive potash pricing, though their risk profiles differ substantially.

Introduction

For investors and traders evaluating opportunities in the agricultural fertilizer sector, CF and IPI represent two fundamentally different approaches to the same broad theme. CF Industries Holdings is a multinational nitrogen products manufacturer with massive scale, robust cash flows, and strategic clean-energy initiatives. Intrepid Potash, the only U.S.-based producer of muriate of potash, occupies a much smaller niche but offers unique attributes including a zero-debt balance sheet and exposure to critical minerals through its lithium project. This comparison is designed for traders and investors seeking to understand how these fertilizer stocks differ across dimensions such as business model, financial resilience, growth trajectory, and market sentiment — and which one a data-driven AI system might favor in the current environment.

CF Overview and Recent Performance

CF Industries Holdings, headquartered in Northbrook, Illinois, is one of the world's largest manufacturers of hydrogen and nitrogen products. Its core offerings — ammonia, granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate solution (UAN), and ammonium nitrate (AN) — are essential inputs for agricultural fertilizers and industrial applications. The company operates some of the largest nitrogen complexes in North America, including facilities in Donaldsonville, Louisiana, and Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada.

CF's financial performance in recent quarters has been exceptionally strong. For full-year 2025, the company reported net earnings of $1.46 billion, or $8.97 per diluted share, and adjusted EBITDA of $2.89 billion on net sales of $7.08 billion. Free cash flow reached approximately $1.79 billion. The company returned $1.7 billion to shareholders during 2025, including $1.34 billion in share repurchases that reduced its outstanding share count by roughly 10%.

In recent weeks, CF shares have traded near the $119–$125 range, with a 52-week span of approximately $75 to $142. The stock's year-to-date return has been robust, supported by constructive global nitrogen market dynamics. Pricing strength has been driven by geopolitical supply disruptions, delayed new capacity, and sustained agricultural demand from key markets such as India, Brazil, and North America.

CF's strategic initiatives continue to draw attention. The Blue Point joint venture with JERA and Mitsui — a $3.7 billion low-carbon ammonia project in Louisiana — is progressing, and the Donaldsonville carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) facility has begun generating 45Q tax credits. These clean-energy efforts position CF to capture premium pricing for low-carbon ammonia. However, investors are also monitoring the ongoing outage at the Yazoo City, Mississippi complex following a late-2025 incident, which is expected to reduce 2026 ammonia production by roughly 600,000 tons year over year.

IPI Overview and Recent Performance

Intrepid Potash, based in Denver, Colorado, is the only domestic U.S. producer of muriate of potash (potassium chloride) and also produces Trio®, a specialty fertilizer derived from langbeinite that delivers potassium, magnesium, and sulfate to crops. The company operates facilities in New Mexico and Utah, serving primarily agricultural markets across the United States.

For full-year 2025, Intrepid delivered total sales of $298.3 million, a 17% year-over-year increase, and net income of $11.2 million, or $0.85 per diluted share. The company's adjusted EBITDA reached $63.1 million, more than double the $35.5 million reported in 2024. The standout performer was the Trio® segment, which achieved record sales volumes of 303,000 tons, supported by strong demand and improved pricing.

IPI's balance sheet remains a notable strength. The company ended 2025 with $83.5 million in cash and cash equivalents, no debt, and an undrawn $150 million revolving credit facility — providing substantial financial flexibility. Sentiment around the stock has also been buoyed by the inclusion of potash on the U.S. Geological Survey's draft list of critical minerals, highlighting domestic supply chain considerations for this essential agricultural input.

Looking ahead, IPI is executing on several operational initiatives. The company plans higher Trio® production in 2026, targeting 285,000 to 300,000 tons, supported by upgraded continuous mining equipment at its East Mine. Meanwhile, its Wendover lithium project — a byproduct extraction venture in partnership with Aquatech and Adionics — has achieved demonstration-scale production of battery-grade lithium carbonate, with a maiden resource estimate of approximately 119,000 tons of lithium carbonate equivalent. The potential sale of the Intrepid South Ranch could also unlock additional value. However, potash production guidance of 270,000 to 285,000 tons for 2026 reflects ongoing weather-related and operational constraints at certain facilities.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate the complexities of stock selection without relying solely on manual analysis, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, spanning multiple sectors, timeframes, and trading styles — but only a fraction earn a spot in the Trending AI Robots section. These are the bots best suited to current market conditions, with many demonstrating annualized returns ranging from approximately 13% to over 300%, depending on strategy, risk profile, and asset selection. Win rates among trending bots frequently exceed 60%, with some reaching above 85%. Each bot operates with distinct parameters — including trading style, timeframe (from 5-minute to multi-day), target tickers, and risk management rules — allowing users to explore strategies aligned with their goals. To discover which AI trading strategies are currently outperforming, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CF and IPI, the most immediate distinction is scale. CF's market capitalization of roughly $18.4 billion dwarfs IPI's sub-$500 million valuation. This translates into fundamentally different investment profiles: CF is a large-cap, cash-rich nitrogen producer with a diversified global footprint, a dividend yield near 1.7%, and aggressive share buyback programs. IPI is a small-cap, debt-free specialty fertilizer company with no dividend but significant potential upside from operational improvements and its lithium byproduct project.

In terms of growth drivers, CF benefits from tight global nitrogen supply-demand dynamics, its cost-advantaged North American natural gas position, and the emerging low-carbon ammonia market — which could command premium pricing as industries and governments prioritize decarbonization. IPI's growth is tied to increased Trio® production efficiencies, potash market fundamentals, and the longer-term optionality of lithium extraction from its Wendover brines.

Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. CF faces operational risks from plant outages, natural gas price volatility, and the capital-intensive Blue Point joint venture. IPI contends with weather-dependent solar evaporation production methods, relatively high unit costs compared to global potash producers, and the inherent uncertainty of its early-stage lithium initiative. However, IPI's debt-free status provides a buffer that CF's leveraged balance sheet does not offer in a downturn.

On sector exposure, both companies participate in the fertilizer market but serve different sub-segments. CF is a pure-play nitrogen producer, while IPI focuses on potash and specialty Trio®. The recent inclusion of potash on the USGS critical minerals list may provide IPI with policy-related tailwinds not directly available to CF. Meanwhile, CF's CCS and low-carbon ammonia initiatives give it exposure to the energy transition theme.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, financial stability, catalysts, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor CF over IPI in the current environment. CF's larger scale, consistent earnings power, robust free cash flow generation, and diversified nitrogen product portfolio provide a more stable foundation for trend-following strategies. The stock's strong year-to-date momentum, constructive nitrogen pricing environment, and shareholder-friendly capital allocation — including a $2 billion active buyback program — create a favorable backdrop. IPI's debt-free balance sheet and lithium optionality are compelling attributes, but its smaller market cap, narrower product focus, and weather-sensitive production introduce higher relative uncertainty. That said, for traders with a higher risk tolerance who are specifically interested in critical minerals exposure or small-cap fertilizer dynamics, IPI offers a differentiated value proposition that may warrant attention. As always, outcomes depend on evolving market conditions and individual strategy parameters.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CF vs. IPI commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CF is a Hold and IPI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CF: $118.30 vs. IPI: $36.62)
Brand notoriety: CF: Notable vs. IPI: Not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CF: 50% vs. IPI: 85%
Market capitalization -- CF: $17.9B vs. IPI: $492.78M
CF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $17.9B. IPI’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $492.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $51.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $9.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIPI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IPI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CF is a better buy in the long-term than IPI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IPI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IPI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CF and IPI are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +3.99% price change this week, while IPI (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was +5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CF is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

IPI is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+1.97% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than IPI($493M). IPI has higher P/E ratio than CF: IPI (31.03) vs CF (8.78). CF YTD gains are higher at: 55.201 vs. IPI (32.059). CF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.15B vs. IPI (55.4M). CF has more cash in the bank: 445M vs. IPI (99.3M). IPI has less debt than CF: IPI (3.68M) vs CF (3.62B). CF has higher revenues than IPI: CF (7.74B) vs IPI (302M).
CFIPICF / IPI
Capitalization17.9B493M3,631%
EBITDA4.15B55.4M7,496%
Gain YTD55.20132.059172%
P/E Ratio8.7831.0328%
Revenue7.74B302M2,563%
Total Cash445M99.3M448%
Total Debt3.62B3.68M98,370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CF vs IPI: Fundamental Ratings
CF
IPI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3694
SMR RATING
1..100
2788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7588
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IPI's Valuation (57) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as CF (68) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that IPI’s stock grew similarly to CF’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (94) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.

CF's SMR Rating (27) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IPI (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IPI’s over the last 12 months.

CF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as IPI (54) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to IPI’s over the last 12 months.

CF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as IPI (88) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that CF’s stock grew similarly to IPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFIPI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IPI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LVOFX21.67N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
ETNMX15.53N/A
N/A
Eventide Balanced Fund Class N
COMAX29.62N/A
N/A
DWS Digital Horizons A
FRVJX43.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate Z
OANMX189.37-0.17
-0.09%
Oakmark Institutional

CF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CF has been closely correlated with NTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CF jumps, then NTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CF
1D Price
Change %
CF100%
+1.59%
NTR - CF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
IPI - CF
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
UAN - CF
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.93%
MOS - CF
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
CTVA - CF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
More

IPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IPI has been closely correlated with CF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IPI jumps, then CF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IPI
1D Price
Change %
IPI100%
+1.78%
CF - IPI
66%
Closely correlated
+1.59%
NTR - IPI
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
MOS - IPI
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
UAN - IPI
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.93%
CTVA - IPI
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
More