CFG
Price
$63.98
Change
+$0.08 (+0.13%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
27.06B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNC
Price
$228.37
Change
+$1.29 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
91.71B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CFG vs PNC

Header iconCFG vs PNC Comparison
Open Charts CFG vs PNCBanner chart's image
CFG vs PNC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citizens Financial Group (CFG) vs. PNC Financial Services Group (PNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CFG and PNC delivered strong Q1 2026 earnings, with revenue growth exceeding 12% year-over-year and positive EPS surprises.
  • CFG boasts a higher year-to-date return of 13.4% compared to PNC's 10.4%, reflecting stronger recent momentum in regional banking peers.
  • PNC, the larger bank by market cap at $91.6 billion versus CFG's $28 billion, benefits from loan growth via its recent FirstBank acquisition and raised 2026 guidance.
  • Dividend yields are competitive, with PNC at 3.0% edging out CFG's 2.8%, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • Trailing P/E ratios favor PNC at 13.2 versus CFG's 15.6, suggesting relative value in the larger peer.
  • Recent market activity highlights sensitivity to interest rates and credit quality for both, with CFG showing quarterly revenue growth of 13.8% matching PNC.

Introduction

This stock comparison pits CFG against PNC, two prominent players in regional banking amid evolving interest rate dynamics and economic shifts. Investors eyeing financial sector exposure—particularly those balancing growth potential with dividend stability—may find value in assessing their relative performance. Recent quarters have seen both banks navigate net interest income (NII, revenue from loans minus deposit costs) pressures while capitalizing on loan demand. Traders focused on momentum or value metrics can use this analysis to gauge positioning in a sector sensitive to Federal Reserve policies and credit trends. Understanding contrasts in scale, growth drivers, and market sentiment aids informed relative performance decisions.

CFG Overview and Recent Performance

Citizens Financial Group (CFG) operates as a regional bank primarily in the Northeast and Midwest, offering consumer banking, commercial lending, and wealth management services. With a market cap of approximately $28 billion, it maintains a diversified deposit base and focuses on relationship banking. In recent market activity, CFG shares have climbed within a 52-week range of $34.92 to $68.79, posting a year-to-date gain of 13.4%. Q1 2026 results highlighted revenue of $2.17 billion, up 12% year-over-year, and normalized EPS of $1.13, a 47% increase, driven by NII expansion and fee income growth. Sentiment has been buoyed by earnings beats, though shares dipped post-release amid broader sector volatility. Key influences include deposit growth and controlled expenses, positioning CFG favorably against regional peers.

PNC Overview and Recent Performance

PNC Financial Services Group (PNC) is a larger diversified bank with $91.6 billion market cap, providing retail banking, corporate financial services, and asset management across the U.S. It emphasizes small business lending and has expanded via acquisitions. Shares trade in a 52-week range of $151.10 to $243.94, with year-to-date returns at 10.4%. Recent Q1 2026 earnings featured revenue near $6.19 billion, up 13% year-over-year, fueled by loan and deposit expansion from the FirstBank deal; adjusted EPS beat estimates. The bank raised full-year guidance for loans and NII, enhancing outlook despite integration costs. Performance reflects resilience in a high-rate environment, with positive sentiment tied to strategic growth and stable deposits.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates top performers from hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Only the most suitable for current volatility—selected by AI based on metrics like returns and risk-adjusted performance—earn a spot among the featured 25 out of 351 total bots. Examples include swing traders in industrials boasting annualized returns up to 34%, semiconductor agents exceeding 97% annualized with 68% win rates, and multi-ticker bots in tech and energy hitting 65-81% returns, profit factors of 1.5-3.6, and profit-to-drawdown ratios around 5.5 on average. Win rates typically range 53-87%, with average trade durations of 1-7 days. These bots employ technical analysis, machine learning, and risk controls for real-time signals. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with your trading style.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business models, both emphasize regional banking but PNC offers broader scale with asset management and corporate services, yielding higher ROE (12.1% vs. CFG's 7.7%) and profit margins (31% vs. 25%). Growth drivers differ: PNC leverages M&A (mergers and acquisitions) like FirstBank for loan expansion, while CFG focuses on organic NII and fees. Recent momentum favors CFG with superior YTD gains, though PNC provides lower beta (0.96 vs. 1.06) for stability. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and credit quality (non-performing loans, NCO), with both showing quarterly revenue growth of 13.8%. Market sentiment tilts toward PNC's size amid economic uncertainty, trading at a discount on P/E, but CFG appeals for value via lower price/book (1.16 vs. 1.43).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward CFG with moderate conviction, citing consistent trend strength, higher YTD relative performance, and earnings catalysts in recent weeks. While PNC excels in scale and guidance upgrades, CFG's momentum and valuation position it probabilistically better for near-term outperformance in a regional bank rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CFG vs. PNC commentary
Jun 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CFG is a StrongBuy and PNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2026
Stock price -- (CFG: $63.98 vs. PNC: $228.37)
Brand notoriety: CFG: Not notable vs. PNC: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CFG: 85% vs. PNC: 68%
Market capitalization -- CFG: $27.06B vs. PNC: $91.71B
CFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $27.06B. PNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $91.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the long-term than PNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFG is a better buy in the short-term than PNC.

Price Growth

CFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.76% price change this week, while PNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

PNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNC($91.7B) has a higher market cap than CFG($27.1B). CFG has higher P/E ratio than PNC: CFG (15.16) vs PNC (13.27). CFG (11.099) and PNC (11.096) have similar YTD gains . CFG has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. PNC (6.78B). CFG has less debt than PNC: CFG (12.3B) vs PNC (66.7B). PNC has higher revenues than CFG: PNC (23.8B) vs CFG (8.48B).
CFGPNCCFG / PNC
Capitalization27.1B91.7B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.09911.096100%
P/E Ratio15.1613.27114%
Revenue8.48B23.8B36%
Total Cash12.7B6.78B187%
Total Debt12.3B66.7B18%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CFG vs PNC: Fundamental Ratings
CFG
PNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5060
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4328
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFG's Valuation (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (60) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

PNC's SMR Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PNC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

PNC's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CFG (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PNC’s stock grew similarly to CFG’s over the last 12 months.

CFG's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CFG’s stock grew similarly to PNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CFGPNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGC44.220.31
+0.71%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp
ASRT23.44-0.01
-0.04%
Assertio Holdings Inc.
BOX26.68-0.09
-0.34%
BOX
CVR10.20-0.16
-1.58%
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co
MTZ363.89-10.84
-2.89%
MasTec

PNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNC has been closely correlated with USB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNC jumps, then USB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNC
1D Price
Change %
PNC100%
+0.57%
USB - PNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
HBAN - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
KEY - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
TFC - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
MTB - PNC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
More