Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) both deliver targeted exposure to transformative technology themes. They do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles within the broader technology sector. CHAT emphasizes generative AI capabilities, while METV focuses on metaverse infrastructure and experiences. Investors comparing the two can evaluate differences in management style, cost, and specific thematic tilts to align with portfolio objectives in an era of accelerating digital innovation.
CHAT is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2023 that seeks to provide exposure to companies engaged in generative AI technologies. The fund holds approximately 49 securities, with top positions including NVDA, GOOGL, AVGO, AMD, and MU as of recent data. Sector allocations center on information technology, particularly semiconductors and enterprise software. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an active strategy, CHAT relies on an investment committee for security selection rather than strict index replication, allowing flexibility to adjust holdings based on generative AI developments across platforms, infrastructure, and applications.
METV is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in June 2021 that seeks to track the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index. The fund provides exposure to companies involved in metaverse-enabling technologies, including compute, networking, virtual platforms, and hardware. It features quarterly index rebalancing. The expense ratio is 0.59%. Top holdings typically include companies such as RBLX, AAPL, NVDA, and GOOGL, alongside other digital ecosystem participants. METV offers a rules-based approach to capturing metaverse-related growth through a diversified basket of technology and infrastructure names.
The technology sector continues to evolve amid advances in artificial intelligence and immersive digital environments. Generative AI drives productivity gains and new application development, while metaverse concepts advance spatial computing, virtual collaboration, and digital commerce. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and capital spending cycles influence both areas. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, competition, and emerging technologies remains a consideration for companies in these spaces. Capital flows into thematic technology strategies reflect ongoing investor interest in long-term innovation themes rather than short-term market events.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to technology sector rotations and earnings trends among large-cap semiconductor and software companies. CHAT’s active management allows potential responsiveness to shifts in generative AI adoption, which may contribute to distinct volatility patterns compared with METV’s index-driven approach. METV’s broader metaverse focus ties performance more closely to hardware and platform developments. Relative positioning depends on the pace of AI commercialization versus metaverse infrastructure buildout, with both funds reflecting broader equity market dynamics in technology over multi-month periods.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like CHAT and METV may find the platform useful for ongoing research.
Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to METV in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, passive index methodology, and established quarterly rebalancing process, which may support more consistent exposure across market cycles. CHAT’s active approach offers potential advantages in a rapidly evolving generative AI landscape but carries higher costs. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on evolving sector momentum and individual investor risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| CHAT | METV | CHAT / METV | |
| Gain YTD | 56.699 | 2.183 | 2,597% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 219M | 908% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.59 | 127% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 55.00 | 58% |
| Yield | 1.72 | 0.18 | 938% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 5 years | - |
| CHAT | METV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HWAY | 37.80 | 0.25 | +0.67% |
| Themes US Infrastructure ETF | |||
| BRF | 16.45 | N/A | N/A |
| VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF | |||
| APRW | 37.24 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF | |||
| CLCG | 28.99 | N/A | N/A |
| Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF | |||
| AIO | 26.88 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAT | 100% | N/A | ||
| COHR - CHAT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| ANET - CHAT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| HPE - CHAT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| ORCL - CHAT | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| DELL - CHAT | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.39% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, METV has been loosely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if METV jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To METV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| METV | 100% | N/A | ||
| AMAT - METV | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| TXN - METV | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| AVGO - METV | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| MRVL - METV | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| TSM - METV | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
More | ||||