CHAT
Price
$91.74
Change
-$0.65 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.99B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
METV
Price
$19.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
218.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs METV

CHAT vs METV Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed fund targeting companies involved in generative artificial intelligence (AI), while METV is a passively managed fund tracking an index of metaverse-related businesses.
  • CHAT maintains approximately 49 holdings with a focus on semiconductor and software leaders, whereas METV offers broader exposure to virtual platforms, hardware, and digital infrastructure through its index methodology.
  • Expense ratios differ, with CHAT at 0.75% and METV at 0.59%, reflecting the active versus passive structures.
  • Both ETFs concentrate in technology sectors but diverge in thematic emphasis: CHAT prioritizes generative AI infrastructure and applications, while METV emphasizes immersive digital ecosystems and spatial computing.
  • Structural differences include CHAT’s discretionary security selection versus METV’s quarterly index rebalancing, leading to distinct risk and diversification profiles within overlapping technology exposure.
  • In the current environment of rapid AI adoption and evolving digital platforms, the ETFs provide differentiated entry points for investors seeking thematic technology exposure.

Introduction

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) both deliver targeted exposure to transformative technology themes. They do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles within the broader technology sector. CHAT emphasizes generative AI capabilities, while METV focuses on metaverse infrastructure and experiences. Investors comparing the two can evaluate differences in management style, cost, and specific thematic tilts to align with portfolio objectives in an era of accelerating digital innovation.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

CHAT is an actively managed exchange-traded fund launched in May 2023 that seeks to provide exposure to companies engaged in generative AI technologies. The fund holds approximately 49 securities, with top positions including NVDA, GOOGL, AVGO, AMD, and MU as of recent data. Sector allocations center on information technology, particularly semiconductors and enterprise software. The expense ratio stands at 0.75%. As an active strategy, CHAT relies on an investment committee for security selection rather than strict index replication, allowing flexibility to adjust holdings based on generative AI developments across platforms, infrastructure, and applications.

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) Overview

METV is a passively managed exchange-traded fund launched in June 2021 that seeks to track the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index. The fund provides exposure to companies involved in metaverse-enabling technologies, including compute, networking, virtual platforms, and hardware. It features quarterly index rebalancing. The expense ratio is 0.59%. Top holdings typically include companies such as RBLX, AAPL, NVDA, and GOOGL, alongside other digital ecosystem participants. METV offers a rules-based approach to capturing metaverse-related growth through a diversified basket of technology and infrastructure names.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to evolve amid advances in artificial intelligence and immersive digital environments. Generative AI drives productivity gains and new application development, while metaverse concepts advance spatial computing, virtual collaboration, and digital commerce. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and capital spending cycles influence both areas. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, competition, and emerging technologies remains a consideration for companies in these spaces. Capital flows into thematic technology strategies reflect ongoing investor interest in long-term innovation themes rather than short-term market events.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to technology sector rotations and earnings trends among large-cap semiconductor and software companies. CHAT’s active management allows potential responsiveness to shifts in generative AI adoption, which may contribute to distinct volatility patterns compared with METV’s index-driven approach. METV’s broader metaverse focus ties performance more closely to hardware and platform developments. Relative positioning depends on the pace of AI commercialization versus metaverse infrastructure buildout, with both funds reflecting broader equity market dynamics in technology over multi-month periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like CHAT and METV may find the platform useful for ongoing research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest edge to METV in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, passive index methodology, and established quarterly rebalancing process, which may support more consistent exposure across market cycles. CHAT’s active approach offers potential advantages in a rapidly evolving generative AI landscape but carries higher costs. The assessment remains probabilistic and depends on evolving sector momentum and individual investor risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. METV commentary
Jul 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and METV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHAT has more net assets: 1.99B vs. METV (219M). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than METV: CHAT (56.699) vs METV (2.183). CHAT was incepted earlier than METV: CHAT (3 years) vs METV (5 years). METV (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). METV has a higher turnover CHAT (32.00) vs CHAT (32.00).
CHATMETVCHAT / METV
Gain YTD56.6992.1832,597%
Net Assets1.99B219M908%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.59127%
Turnover32.0055.0058%
Yield1.720.18938%
Fund Existence3 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATMETV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
METV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWAY37.800.25
+0.67%
Themes US Infrastructure ETF
BRF16.45N/A
N/A
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
APRW37.24N/A
N/A
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF
CLCG28.99N/A
N/A
Crossmark Large Cap Growth ETF
AIO26.88-0.01
-0.04%
Virtus Artificial Intelligence & Technology Opportunities Fund

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been loosely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
N/A
COHR - CHAT
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
ANET - CHAT
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
HPE - CHAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
ORCL - CHAT
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
DELL - CHAT
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.39%
More

METV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, METV has been loosely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if METV jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To METV
1D Price
Change %
METV100%
N/A
AMAT - METV
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
TXN - METV
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
AVGO - METV
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
MRVL - METV
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
TSM - METV
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More