CHAT
Price
$87.28
Change
+$1.70 (+1.99%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.86B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QTUM
Price
$148.78
Change
+$1.83 (+1.25%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.63B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHAT vs QTUM

CHAT vs QTUM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) vs. Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

Key Takeaways

  • CHAT is an actively managed ETF focused on generative artificial intelligence (AI) and technology companies, while QTUM is a passively managed fund tracking an index of quantum computing and machine learning firms.
  • CHAT holds approximately 53 securities with concentrated exposure to large-cap technology leaders, whereas QTUM maintains 71 to 89 holdings in a modified equal-weighted structure emphasizing quantum and machine learning innovators.
  • Both ETFs allocate roughly 78% to the technology sector, but QTUM features greater exposure to industrials at around 10% compared to CHAT's approximately 3%.
  • CHAT carries a higher expense ratio of 0.75%, reflecting active management, while QTUM offers a lower 0.40% expense ratio as a passive index tracker.
  • CHAT provides concentrated thematic exposure to generative AI applications, and QTUM delivers diversified access to emerging quantum computing and machine learning technologies.
  • Structural differences position CHAT for investors seeking active stock selection in generative AI and QTUM for those preferring rules-based exposure to quantum and machine learning themes.

Introduction

Investors seeking targeted exposure to artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced computing technologies often evaluate specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs). The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and the Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) represent distinct approaches within the broader technology sector. CHAT emphasizes generative AI applications through active management, while QTUM focuses on quantum computing and machine learning via passive indexing. These funds do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for investors pursuing similar long-term goals in high-growth technology themes amid ongoing innovation cycles.

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) Overview

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is an actively managed ETF that seeks to provide exposure to companies involved in generative AI and related technologies. The fund typically holds around 53 securities. Top holdings often include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Alphabet Inc (GOOGL), SK hynix Inc, Broadcom Inc (AVGO), and similar leaders in semiconductors and software. Sector allocations center on technology at approximately 78%, followed by communication services near 17%, with smaller weights in industrials and consumer cyclical sectors. CHAT maintains an expense ratio of 0.75%. As an actively managed vehicle, it employs discretionary stock selection rather than strict index replication, distinguishing it from passive thematic peers.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a passively managed fund that tracks the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index, which uses a modified equal-weighted methodology. The ETF typically holds between 71 and 89 securities. Top holdings generally feature companies such as Arqit Quantum Inc (ARQQ), Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd, Elastic NV (ESTC), and other firms deriving significant revenue from quantum computing or machine learning. Sector allocations include technology at roughly 79%, industrials around 10%, and communication services near 7%. QTUM carries an expense ratio of 0.40%. Its rules-based approach provides systematic exposure without active manager intervention.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, quantum research, and machine learning applications. Capital flows into these areas reflect enterprise adoption and government initiatives supporting advanced computing. Regulatory developments around data privacy and export controls on semiconductor technology represent ongoing considerations. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate environments and corporate capital expenditure cycles influence sector momentum. Risks include valuation compression during periods of elevated interest rates and potential supply chain disruptions affecting hardware components.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to technology sector rotations driven by earnings growth in semiconductor and software companies. CHAT's active approach has allowed flexibility in weighting generative AI leaders during periods of strong earnings momentum. QTUM's equal-weighted methodology has provided broader participation across quantum and machine learning names, potentially moderating concentration risk. Relative positioning highlights CHAT's tilt toward established large-cap names versus QTUM's emphasis on emerging technology subsectors, resulting in differing volatility profiles tied to innovation cycles rather than isolated market events.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor the Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) in the current environment due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across quantum computing and machine learning holdings, and systematic equal-weighted methodology that reduces single-stock concentration. The passive structure offers cost efficiency and consistent exposure to thematic growth areas, supporting favorable positioning relative to structural factors such as risk-adjusted diversification and sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHAT vs. QTUM commentary
Aug 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHAT is a Hold and QTUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTUM has more net assets: 5.63B vs. CHAT (1.86B). CHAT has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: CHAT (45.149) vs QTUM (34.490). CHAT was incepted earlier than QTUM: CHAT (3 years) vs QTUM (8 years). QTUM (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than CHAT (0.75). CHAT has a higher turnover QTUM (42.00) vs QTUM (42.00).
CHATQTUMCHAT / QTUM
Gain YTD45.14934.490131%
Net Assets1.86B5.63B33%
Total Expense Ratio0.750.40188%
Turnover92.0042.00219%
Yield2.020.83243%
Fund Existence3 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHATQTUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSMPX345.48N/A
N/A
Vanguard MStar Total Stk Mkt Idx Inst Pl
VCULX19.05N/A
N/A
VALIC Company I Growth
FIUSX39.59N/A
N/A
Nomura Opportunity A
TAAGX18.08N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
TIEHX18.04N/A
N/A
Nuveen International Eq I

CHAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHAT has been closely correlated with COHR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHAT jumps, then COHR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHAT
1D Price
Change %
CHAT100%
-2.75%
COHR - CHAT
70%
Closely correlated
-4.85%
ANET - CHAT
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
HPE - CHAT
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
ORCL - CHAT
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
DELL - CHAT
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
More

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
-2.35%
LRCX - QTUM
81%
Closely correlated
-1.22%
MKSI - QTUM
79%
Closely correlated
-3.60%
LSCC - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.01%
AMAT - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
KLAC - QTUM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.32%
More