CHFFY
Price
$4.14
Change
-$0.12 (-2.82%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
GFL
Price
$48.22
Change
+$0.19 (+0.40%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHFFY vs GFL

Header iconCHFFY vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CHFFY vs GFLBanner chart's image
China Everbright Environment Group
Price$4.14
Change-$0.12 (-2.82%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.44B
GFL Environmental
Price$48.22
Change+$0.19 (+0.40%)
Volume$653.52K
Capitalization12.81B
CHFFY vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CHFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHFFY vs. GFL commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHFFY is a Hold and GFL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CHFFY: $3.91 vs. GFL: $48.22)
Brand notoriety: CHFFY and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHFFY: 100% vs. GFL: 57%
Market capitalization -- CHFFY: $2.44B vs. GFL: $12.81B
CHFFY [@Environmental Services] is valued at $2.44B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHFFY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHFFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than CHFFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHFFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHFFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHFFY is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

CHFFY (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was +1.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHFFY is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

GFL is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+3.42% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CHFFY($2.44B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CHFFY: GFL (359.45) vs CHFFY (4.06). GFL YTD gains are higher at: 8.366 vs. CHFFY (-2.817). CHFFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8B vs. GFL (2.22B). CHFFY has higher revenues than GFL: CHFFY (37.3B) vs GFL (7.52B).
CHFFYGFLCHFFY / GFL
Capitalization2.44B12.8B19%
EBITDA12.8B2.22B578%
Gain YTD-2.8178.366-34%
P/E Ratio4.06359.451%
Revenue37.3B7.52B496%
Total CashN/A136M-
Total DebtN/A9.29B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHFFY: Fundamental Ratings
CHFFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
33
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHFFYGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHFFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBHCX8.49N/A
N/A
Victory Market Neutral Income C
DSCPX17.55N/A
N/A
Davenport Small Cap Focus
IJSAX12.19N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity A
JGTTX40.99N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R3
RMOMX24.21N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Member

CHFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFFY and TSPCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFFY and TSPCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFFY
1D Price
Change %
CHFFY100%
N/A
TSPCF - CHFFY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
CWSFF - CHFFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-48.40%
VEOEF - CHFFY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTQNF - CHFFY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFL - CHFFY
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
+0.40%
WCN - GFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
CWST - GFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
RSG - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
WM - GFL
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CLH - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
More