GFL
Price
$40.43
Change
-$1.40 (-3.35%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
18.05B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSG
Price
$206.98
Change
-$2.89 (-1.38%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
65.2B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs RSG

GFL vs RSG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. RSG commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Buy and RSG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFL vs RSG: Fundamental Ratings
GFL
RSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6555
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7930
SMR RATING
1..100
9249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSG's Valuation (41) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (85) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (79) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's SMR Rating (49) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (92) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

GFL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as RSG (58) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLRSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (GFL: $40.43 vs. RSG: $206.98)
Brand notoriety: GFL and RSG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 187% vs. RSG: 98%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $18.05B vs. RSG: $65.2B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $18.05B. RSG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $65.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $4.98K to $82.52B. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $10.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while RSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RSG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was -2.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.76% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

View a ticker or compare two or three
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPRO1.260.05
+4.13%
Spero Therapeutics
CNA45.881.00
+2.23%
CNA Financial Corp
RAMP37.700.18
+0.48%
LiveRamp Holdings
TRUG2.94-0.03
-1.01%
Trugolf Holdings Inc
KDK1.67-0.25
-13.02%
Kodiak AI Inc

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
-3.35%
WCN - GFL
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
RSG - GFL
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
WM - GFL
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
CWST - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
CLH - GFL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

RSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSG
1D Price
Change %
RSG100%
-1.38%
WM - RSG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
WCN - RSG
75%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
GFL - RSG
44%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
CLH - RSG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
QRHC - RSG
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More