GFL
Price
$42.87
Change
-$0.86 (-1.97%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RSG
Price
$221.65
Change
-$1.06 (-0.48%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.87B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFL vs RSG

GFL vs RSG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFL vs. RSG commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFL is a Buy and RSG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2026
Stock price -- (GFL: $42.87 vs. RSG: $221.63)
Brand notoriety: GFL and RSG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFL: 278% vs. RSG: 105%
Market capitalization -- GFL: $18.69B vs. RSG: $67.87B
GFL [@Environmental Services] is valued at $18.69B. RSG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $67.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $87.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $11.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RSG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the long-term than GFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RSG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RSG is a better buy in the short-term than GFL.

Price Growth

GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а +3.30% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

RSG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.86% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSG($67.9B) has a higher market cap than GFL($18.7B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than RSG: GFL (108.15) vs RSG (31.39). RSG YTD gains are higher at: 5.491 vs. GFL (-0.069). RSG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.14B vs. GFL (1.65B). GFL has more cash in the bank: 192M vs. RSG (107M). GFL has less debt than RSG: GFL (10.1B) vs RSG (14.3B). RSG has higher revenues than GFL: RSG (16.9B) vs GFL (6.97B).
GFLRSGGFL / RSG
Capitalization18.7B67.9B28%
EBITDA1.65B5.14B32%
Gain YTD-0.0695.491-1%
P/E Ratio108.1531.39344%
Revenue6.97B16.9B41%
Total Cash192M107M179%
Total Debt10.1B14.3B71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFL vs RSG: Fundamental Ratings
GFL
RSG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6923
SMR RATING
1..100
9249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4850
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10055
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RSG's Valuation (39) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (84) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (69) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's SMR Rating (49) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (92) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

GFL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as RSG (50) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.

RSG's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFLRSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RSG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMSI89.601.03
+1.16%
Merit Medical Systems
CFBK35.730.03
+0.08%
CF Bankshares
FSBC46.58-0.38
-0.81%
Five Star Bancorp
CI282.52-3.74
-1.31%
Cigna Group (The)
EFOI2.84-0.04
-1.39%
Energy Focus

RSG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSG
1D Price
Change %
RSG100%
-0.48%
WM - RSG
82%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
WCN - RSG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
CWST - RSG
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.56%
GFL - RSG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
CLH - RSG
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
More