Investors and traders evaluating opportunities in the environmental services industry often compare established players to assess relative value, operational resilience, and growth trajectories. GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) and Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) both provide non-hazardous waste collection, recycling, and disposal services across North America, making them direct peers in a defensive sector supported by recurring demand. This comparison is particularly relevant for those seeking exposure to infrastructure-like cash flows, sustainability trends, or sector rotation strategies. By examining business models, recent price behavior, and key differentiators, market participants can better understand trade-offs in scale, momentum, and positioning within the current environment.
GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL) delivers non-hazardous solid waste management, infrastructure, soil remediation, and liquid waste services primarily in Canada and the United States. The company has pursued aggressive expansion through acquisitions to build scale. In recent weeks, GFL shares have experienced notable volatility, trading in the $39–$41 range following second-quarter 2026 earnings released in late July. Management raised full-year guidance, citing revenue growth, record adjusted EBITDA margins, and operational improvements. Earlier market activity reflected concerns over a large stock-funded acquisition and associated leverage, which contributed to sentiment pressure before the earnings update. Broader sector stability and demand resilience have supported a modest recovery in recent market activity, though integration risks remain a focal point for observers.
Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is one of the largest providers of non-hazardous waste services in the United States, offering collection, transfer, recycling, and disposal through an extensive network. The company emphasizes operational efficiency and sustainability initiatives. In recent weeks, RSG shares have traded near $210 with relatively contained price swings compared to smaller peers. Operational highlights include continued expansion of its electric vehicle fleet and nearly $1 billion in cumulative sustainability investments. Second-quarter 2026 earnings expectations and ongoing share repurchases or dividend consistency have contributed to steady sentiment. Market activity reflects the company’s established market position and recurring revenue base, which tend to provide downside protection during broader equity fluctuations.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only those demonstrating superior risk-adjusted results, consistency, and relevance earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, including win rates often between 55% and 75%, profit factors above 1.5 in top models, and drawdowns managed below 20% in many cases, with some achieving annualized returns exceeding 30% in favorable periods. Each bot employs distinct approaches—such as momentum, mean-reversion, or multi-factor models—and focuses on specific ticker sets. The section provides transparent performance data to help users identify suitable automated strategies. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and backtested results.
Both companies operate in the waste management sector, yet differ significantly in scale and strategy. RSG maintains a larger market capitalization and primarily U.S.-focused operations with established infrastructure, supporting more predictable cash flows and lower execution risk. GFL, with its Canadian base and active acquisition program, pursues faster growth through market share gains but carries higher integration and leverage considerations. Recent momentum has favored steadier performers like RSG amid acquisition-related volatility for GFL. Sector exposure remains similar, with both benefiting from regulatory tailwinds around recycling and sustainability, though RSG’s larger size provides greater resilience to input cost fluctuations. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts: RSG often trades at a premium valuation reflecting stability, while GFL offers a potentially higher-beta profile tied to expansion catalysts. Trade-offs center on growth versus defensiveness, with neither dominating across all metrics in the current environment.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings stability, and relative positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to Republic Services, Inc. (RSG). The larger scale, recurring revenue visibility, and measured sustainability progress contribute to more consistent performance signals compared to GFL’s acquisition-driven volatility. That said, GFL’s recent guidance raise and growth trajectory could narrow the gap if integration proceeds smoothly. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to evolving market data rather than a definitive ranking.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRSG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSG’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).
GFL (@Environmental Services) experienced а +0.24% price change this week, while RSG (@Environmental Services) price change was +2.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +3.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.89%.
RSG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
| GFL | RSG | GFL / RSG | |
| Capitalization | 15B | 65.9B | 23% |
| EBITDA | 1.61B | 5.13B | 31% |
| Gain YTD | -2.912 | 2.440 | -119% |
| P/E Ratio | 108.15 | 30.48 | 355% |
| Revenue | 6.97B | 16.7B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 192M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10.1B | 14.1B | 72% |
GFL | RSG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RSG's Valuation (39) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (84) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (68) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's SMR Rating (49) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (93) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
GFL's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as RSG (59) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that GFL’s stock grew similarly to RSG’s over the last 12 months.
RSG's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GFL (100) in the null industry. This means that RSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GFL’s over the last 12 months.
| GFL | RSG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 38% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSG has been closely correlated with WM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RSG jumps, then WM could also see price increases.