CLH
Price
$234.15
Change
+$3.81 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.63B
26 days until earnings call
GFL
Price
$48.49
Change
+$0.12 (+0.25%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLH vs GFL

Header iconCLH vs GFL Comparison
Open Charts CLH vs GFLBanner chart's image
Clean Harbors
Price$234.15
Change+$3.81 (+1.65%)
Volume$332.43K
Capitalization10.63B
GFL Environmental
Price$48.49
Change+$0.12 (+0.25%)
Volume$1.08M
Capitalization12.81B
CLH vs GFL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLH vs. GFL commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLH is a StrongBuy and GFL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLH: $234.15 vs. GFL: $48.49)
Brand notoriety: CLH and GFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLH: 99% vs. GFL: 77%
Market capitalization -- CLH: $10.63B vs. GFL: $12.81B
CLH [@Environmental Services] is valued at $10.63B. GFL’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $12.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the long-term than CLH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFL is a better buy in the short-term than CLH.

Price Growth

CLH (@Environmental Services) experienced а +1.69% price change this week, while GFL (@Environmental Services) price change was -4.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

GFL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.64% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFL($12.8B) has a higher market cap than CLH($10.6B). GFL has higher P/E ratio than CLH: GFL (359.45) vs CLH (28.35). GFL YTD gains are higher at: 8.938 vs. CLH (1.742). GFL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. CLH (990M). CLH has more cash in the bank: 551M vs. GFL (136M). CLH has less debt than GFL: CLH (2.49B) vs GFL (9.29B). GFL has higher revenues than CLH: GFL (7.52B) vs CLH (5.41B).
CLHGFLCLH / GFL
Capitalization10.6B12.8B83%
EBITDA990M2.22B45%
Gain YTD1.7428.93819%
P/E Ratio28.35359.458%
Revenue5.41B7.52B72%
Total Cash551M136M405%
Total Debt2.49B9.29B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLH: Fundamental Ratings
CLH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLHGFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USSE32.360.42
+1.31%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF
ILCV84.990.45
+0.53%
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
DWCR33.87N/A
N/A
Arrow DWA Tactical International ETF
LFAU157.41N/A
N/A
LifeX 2058 Longevity Income ETF
MGOV20.05-0.03
-0.17%
First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF

CLH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLH has been loosely correlated with NVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLH jumps, then NVRI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLH
1D Price
Change %
CLH100%
+1.65%
NVRI - CLH
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
WCN - CLH
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
CWST - CLH
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
GFL - CLH
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
PESI - CLH
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
More

GFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFL has been loosely correlated with WCN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFL jumps, then WCN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFL
1D Price
Change %
GFL100%
+0.25%
WCN - GFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
RSG - GFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
CWST - GFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
WM - GFL
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
CLH - GFL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
More