Intraday BUY SELL Signals
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMDT vs MDLZ
CMDT vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts CMDT vs MDLZ
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Act Exc-Trd Fd
Price$27.20
Change-$0.09 (-0.33%)
Volume$425
Net Assets583.65M
Mondelez International
Price$55.74
Change-$0.34 (-0.61%)
Volume$121.9K
Capitalization71.94B
CMDT vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMDT vs. MDLZ commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDT is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CMDT | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFRO | 6.02 | 0.08 | +1.35% |
| Highland Opportunities and Income Fund | |||
| XTWO | 49.56 | 0.05 | +0.09% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg Two YrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
| CBON | 22.43 | N/A | +0.02% |
| VanEck China Bond ETF | |||
| FIRS | 23.08 | N/A | N/A |
| FIRE Funds Wealth Builder ETF | |||
| DFAU | 44.61 | -0.68 | -1.50% |
| Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | |||
CMDT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CMDT and PWR have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMDT and PWR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMDT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMDT | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| PWR - CMDT | 1% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| MDLZ - CMDT | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.59% |
MDLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDLZ | 100% | -0.59% | ||
| GIS - MDLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| CAG - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CPB - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| KHC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| MKC - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
More | ||||