Advertisement
FRSH vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs. Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both FRSH and TEAM operate in the SaaS space but target different niches: customer and employee experience for Freshworks versus collaboration tools for Atlassian.
- FRSH shows profitability with a 21.90% profit margin and positive EPS of $0.63 (TTM), contrasting TEAM's negative margins and EPS of -$0.72.
- Year-to-date, TEAM has outperformed with +57.31% gains compared to FRSH's +31.92%, amid volatile trading.
- FRSH trades at a forward PE of 13.24 with a smaller market cap of $2.33B, while TEAM lacks a PE ratio due to losses and has a $18.26B cap.
- Recent market activity highlights TEAM's AI integrations and partnerships, boosting sentiment amid broader software sector pressures.
- FRSH demonstrates stability in recent weeks, supported by strong cash position of $781M.
Introduction
In the competitive SaaS landscape, FRSH and TEAM represent distinct approaches to software solutions for businesses. Freshworks focuses on customer engagement and employee productivity tools, while Atlassian emphasizes team collaboration and project management. This comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers, aiding traders seeking short-term momentum and investors evaluating long-term stability in a volatile tech sector. With both stocks showing year-to-date gains amid economic uncertainties, understanding relative strengths helps inform portfolio decisions.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) delivers software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms for customer experience (CX) and employee experience (EX), including Freshdesk for support and Freshservice for IT management. Headquartered in San Mateo, California, the company has achieved GAAP profitability in recent quarters, bolstering investor confidence. In recent market activity, FRSH shares have traded stably around the low $8 range, reflecting resilience despite sector headwinds. Year-to-date gains of approximately 32% outpace many peers, driven by revenue growth to $839M (TTM) and a robust $781M cash reserve. Sentiment remains supported by consistent execution, including expansions in AI-powered Freddy platform adoption, though broader software selloffs have capped upside.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian Corporation (TEAM), based in Sydney, Australia, provides collaboration software like Jira for project tracking and Confluence for knowledge sharing. The platform serves enterprise teams globally, with recent emphases on AI enhancements via Rovo and partnerships such as Google Cloud's Gemini integration. Shares have exhibited volatility in recent weeks, fluctuating between the high $50s and low $70s, following a steep decline from 52-week highs above $240. Year-to-date performance stands at +57%, fueled by strong revenue of $5.76B (TTM), yet profitability challenges persist with negative EPS. Key influences include analyst price target adjustments and restructuring efforts to prioritize AI and enterprise sales, contributing to mixed sentiment amid upcoming earnings.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored to current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including technical and fundamental analysis, with timeframes like 60-minute, 15-minute, and 5-minute intervals, and performance ratings for low, medium, or high volatility environments. Virtual Agents, Signal Agents, and Brokerage Agents offer varied trading styles, enabling users to copy high-win-rate patterns or momentum plays on thousands of tickers. This dynamic leaderboard highlights bots with proven edge in recent trends, appealing to traders seeking automated, data-driven insights without manual analysis. Explore the page to align bots with your risk profile and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FRSH and TEAM both thrive in SaaS but diverge in focus: Freshworks on CX/EX unification versus Atlassian's project and developer tools ecosystem. Growth drivers for FRSH include profitability and cash generation ($160M levered FCF TTM), contrasting TEAM's scale ($1.52B FCF) amid losses. Recent momentum favors TEAM's YTD edge, yet FRSH offers lower risk via positive ROE (16.93%) and attractive valuation. Sector exposure ties both to enterprise software, vulnerable to economic slowdowns, but TEAM faces higher volatility (52-week range extremes) and debt (76% debt/equity). Market sentiment leans toward TEAM's AI catalysts, while FRSH benefits from stability trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward FRSH with higher probability for near-term outperformance, citing its profitability, reasonable valuation, and price stability amid software sector turbulence. While TEAM holds growth potential through AI expansions and larger scale, its volatility and negative earnings introduce elevated risks. This assessment reflects trend consistency and relative positioning as of recent data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and TEAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FRSH | TEAM | FRSH / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 2.61B | 22.5B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | -21.17M | -203% |
| Gain YTD | -22.898 | -45.405 | 50% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.37 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 871M | 6.19B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 779M | 1.14B | 69% |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 1.24B | 3% |
FRSH | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (57) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as TEAM (61) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FRSH (27) in the Restaurants industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 69% | 13 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
More | ||||
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| FRSH - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
More | ||||