CMG
Price
$34.60
Change
+$1.17 (+3.50%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
44.38B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SG
Price
$8.07
Change
+$0.22 (+2.80%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
932.8M
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs SG

CMG vs SG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. SG commentary
Jul 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a StrongBuy and SG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 10, 2026
Stock price -- (CMG: $34.60 vs. SG: $8.07)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. SG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 79% vs. SG: 54%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $44.38B vs. SG: $932.8M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $44.38B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $932.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $196.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the long-term than CMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -7.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.44% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($44.4B) has a higher market cap than SG($933M). SG has higher P/E ratio than CMG: SG (67.25) vs CMG (31.74). SG YTD gains are higher at: 19.379 vs. CMG (-6.486). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.31B vs. SG (92.6M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. SG (157M). SG has less debt than CMG: SG (356M) vs CMG (5.25B). CMG has higher revenues than SG: CMG (12.1B) vs SG (675M).
CMGSGCMG / SG
Capitalization44.4B933M4,759%
EBITDA2.31B92.6M2,494%
Gain YTD-6.48619.379-33%
P/E Ratio31.7467.2547%
Revenue12.1B675M1,793%
Total Cash869M157M554%
Total Debt5.25B356M1,474%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3977
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
2089
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8535
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMG's Valuation (83) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (98) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (89) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CMG (58) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMG (85) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EQS1.200.04
+3.68%
Equus Total Return
KEYS322.174.93
+1.55%
Keysight Technologies
MC65.400.82
+1.27%
Moelis & Company
NEN57.97N/A
N/A
New England Realty Associates Limited
PDS80.62-0.64
-0.79%
Precision Drilling Corp

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+3.50%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
SG - CMG
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
CAVA - CMG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
CAKE - CMG
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
WING - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
More

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
+2.80%
CMG - SG
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.50%
CAVA - SG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
BROS - SG
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
BJRI - SG
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
More