CMG
Price
$55.90
Change
-$0.30 (-0.53%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
76.17B
12 days until earnings call
SG
Price
$29.13
Change
-$1.37 (-4.49%)
Updated
Jan 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.37B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMG vs SG

Header iconCMG vs SG Comparison
Open Charts CMG vs SGBanner chart's image
Chipotle Mexican Grill
Price$55.90
Change-$0.30 (-0.53%)
Volume$12.76M
Capitalization76.17B
Sweetgreen
Price$29.13
Change-$1.37 (-4.49%)
Volume$5.16M
Capitalization3.37B
CMG vs SG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. SG commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a StrongBuy and SG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CMG: $55.90 vs. SG: $29.13)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. SG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 150% vs. SG: 202%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $76.17B vs. SG: $3.37B
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $76.17B. SG’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $201.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the long-term than SG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the short-term than CMG.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while SG (@Restaurants) price change was -11.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SG is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+1.78% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($76.2B) has a higher market cap than SG($3.37B). CMG YTD gains are higher at: -7.297 vs. SG (-9.139). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.28B vs. SG (-22.5M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. SG (235M). SG has less debt than CMG: SG (314M) vs CMG (4.48B). CMG has higher revenues than SG: CMG (11B) vs SG (669M).
CMGSGCMG / SG
Capitalization76.2B3.37B2,262%
EBITDA2.28B-22.5M-10,116%
Gain YTD-7.297-9.13980%
P/E Ratio51.91N/A-
Revenue11B669M1,644%
Total Cash1.37B235M582%
Total Debt4.48B314M1,428%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs SG: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
SG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5516
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1258
SMR RATING
1..100
2295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7281
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMG's Valuation (85) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SG (58) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew somewhat faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (22) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for SG (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CMG (55) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (81) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRM13.910.11
+0.80%
Perimeter Solutions Inc
MAIN60.73-0.11
-0.18%
Main Street Capital Corp
ICLR203.07-2.00
-0.98%
ICON plc
IPW0.82-0.01
-1.44%
iPower
APEI21.74-0.72
-3.21%
American Public Education

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
-0.53%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
WING - CMG
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
DAVE - CMG
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.65%
DPZ - CMG
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
SG - CMG
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
More