CMG
Price
$33.34
Change
+$1.06 (+3.28%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
42.77B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STKS
Price
$1.99
Change
+$0.17 (+9.34%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
62.81M
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMG vs STKS

CMG vs STKS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMG vs. STKS commentary
Jun 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMG is a StrongBuy and STKS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2026
Stock price -- (CMG: $33.34 vs. STKS: $1.99)
Brand notoriety: CMG: Notable vs. STKS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMG: 307% vs. STKS: 113%
Market capitalization -- CMG: $42.77B vs. STKS: $62.81M
CMG [@Restaurants] is valued at $42.77B. STKS’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $62.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $191.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STKS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMG and STKS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • STKS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMG is a better buy in the short-term than STKS.

Price Growth

CMG (@Restaurants) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while STKS (@Restaurants) price change was +3.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

STKS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.37% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMG($42.8B) has a higher market cap than STKS($62.8M). STKS has higher P/E ratio than CMG: STKS (36.60) vs CMG (28.02). STKS YTD gains are higher at: 13.714 vs. CMG (-9.892). CMG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.31B vs. STKS (83.3M). CMG has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. STKS (6.12M). STKS has less debt than CMG: STKS (644M) vs CMG (5.25B). CMG has higher revenues than STKS: CMG (12.1B) vs STKS (807M).
CMGSTKSCMG / STKS
Capitalization42.8B62.8M68,153%
EBITDA2.31B83.3M2,772%
Gain YTD-9.89213.714-72%
P/E Ratio28.0236.6077%
Revenue12.1B807M1,499%
Total Cash869M6.12M14,197%
Total Debt5.25B644M815%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMG vs STKS: Fundamental Ratings
CMG
STKS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89100
SMR RATING
1..100
2099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8810
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STKS's Valuation (69) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (81). This means that STKS’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as STKS (100). This means that CMG’s stock grew similarly to STKS’s over the last 12 months.

CMG's SMR Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for STKS (99). This means that CMG’s stock grew significantly faster than STKS’s over the last 12 months.

STKS's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as CMG (60). This means that STKS’s stock grew similarly to CMG’s over the last 12 months.

STKS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMG (88). This means that STKS’s stock grew significantly faster than CMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMGSTKS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STKS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LION16.400.58
+3.67%
Lionsgate Studios Corp
ANIK15.100.48
+3.28%
Anika Therapeutics
AEBI13.08-0.12
-0.91%
Aebi Schmidt Holding Ag
OXY49.99-1.22
-2.38%
Occidental Petroleum Corp
AIFA2.32-0.08
-3.33%
All In FutureTech Alliance Inc

CMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMG has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMG jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMG
1D Price
Change %
CMG100%
+3.28%
FRSH - CMG
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.42%
SG - CMG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
CAVA - CMG
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
CAKE - CMG
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
WING - CMG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
More

STKS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STKS has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STKS jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STKS
1D Price
Change %
STKS100%
+9.34%
FRSH - STKS
42%
Loosely correlated
+7.42%
RAVE - STKS
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
SHAK - STKS
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
CBRL - STKS
29%
Poorly correlated
+9.37%
CMG - STKS
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.28%
More