When evaluating industrial stalwarts for a portfolio, the comparison between CMI and EMR presents a compelling study in contrasting paths to value creation. Cummins Inc., the century-old engine and power solutions manufacturer, and Emerson Electric Co., now repositioned as a focused industrial automation and software company, both operate at the intersection of global infrastructure and technology trends. Yet their business models, growth catalysts, and risk profiles diverge meaningfully. This stock comparison examines how each company has performed in recent months, what forces are shaping their relative market positioning, and where AI-driven analysis sees the balance of opportunity. The analysis is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to industrial cyclicals with secular growth tailwinds.
Cummins Inc. (CMI), headquartered in Columbus, Indiana, is a global leader in diesel and alternative-fuel engines, power generation systems, and related components and distribution services. The company operates through five business segments: Engine, Components, Distribution, Power Systems, and Accelera (its electrification and hydrogen subsidiary). In recent weeks, Cummins reported full-year 2025 results that highlighted a tale of two businesses. Full-year revenues reached $33.7 billion, down approximately 1% year-over-year, while GAAP net income came in at $2.8 billion, or $20.50 per diluted share. The headline numbers were shaped by $458 million in charges tied to a strategic review of its electrolyzer business within the Accelera segment, reflecting tempered expectations for hydrogen adoption. Stripping out those charges, operational performance was notably resilient.
The standout story has been the company's power generation momentum. The Power Systems and Distribution segments each posted record full-year sales and profitability, fueled directly by robust demand for backup power solutions — particularly from the expanding data center market. In contrast, the Engine and Components segments have faced sustained pressure from the cyclical downturn in North American medium-duty and heavy-duty truck production. Looking ahead, Cummins guided for 2026 revenue growth of 3% to 8%, with EBITDA margins expected to expand into the 17%–18% range, signaling confidence that the truck cycle may stabilize while data center demand remains a durable growth pillar. Analysts have taken note: UBS recently upgraded the stock from Sell to Neutral, citing a bottoming truck cycle, while Truist Securities upgraded the shares to Buy, explicitly pointing to strength in the power segment. The stock has climbed near 52-week highs in recent months, supported by a 16-year track record of consecutive dividend increases and $1.055 billion returned to shareholders through dividends in 2025 alone.
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR), based in St. Louis, Missouri, has undergone a dramatic portfolio transformation over the past several years and now positions itself as the world's leading pure-play industrial automation company. Its business is organized around two primary segments: Software & Control, and Intelligent Devices, serving process, hybrid, and discrete manufacturing industries. For its fiscal year 2025 ended September 30, Emerson reported revenues of $18.0 billion, up 3% year-over-year, with adjusted earnings per share of $6.00, representing 9% growth. Adjusted segment EBITA margin reached 27.6%, an expansion of 160 basis points (a basis point equals one-hundredth of a percentage point), driven by favorable price-cost dynamics, cost reduction initiatives, and a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin software revenue. Free cash flow surged 12% to $3.245 billion.
A central development in recent quarters has been the completion of the AspenTech integration, which not only closed Emerson's portfolio transformation but also achieved the targeted $200 million in run-rate cost synergies. The company also announced a 5% quarterly dividend increase to $0.555 per share and authorized a new 50-million-share repurchase program, supplementing an existing authorization. Underlying orders grew 6% in the most recent quarter, with Test & Measurement surging 27%, powered by semiconductor, aerospace, and defense demand. However, headwinds persist: Europe and China remain soft, discrete automation — particularly automotive and factory automation — continues to lag, and a $120 million software contract renewal timing headwind is expected to weigh on fiscal 2026. The company guided for approximately 5.5% total sales growth in fiscal 2026 and adjusted EPS of $6.35 to $6.55. Notably, the stock sold off approximately 7% following its most recent quarterly report, as a slight revenue miss and conservative near-term guidance disappointed some market participants, though the longer-term secular growth thesis remains firmly intact.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like the one between CMI and EMR, Tickeron's platform offers a compelling resource. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other asset classes. However, not all bots are created equal — only the most consistently effective strategies, the ones best aligned with prevailing market conditions, earn a place in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These AI robots span a wide range of trading styles, from swing trading and momentum strategies to trend-following and hedging approaches, operating on timeframes as short as 5 minutes and as long as 60 minutes. In recent months, top-performing bots on the platform have delivered annualized returns ranging from approximately 75% to over 500%, with some strategies achieving win rates above 85%. Each bot comes with its own statistics, performance history, and set of traded tickers, allowing users to find strategies that match their risk tolerance and objectives. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading the curve.
While both CMI and EMR sit within the broad industrial sector, their comparison reveals fundamentally different investment propositions. In terms of business model, Cummins is an asset-heavy manufacturer of engines, power systems, and components with a far larger revenue footprint ($33.7 billion vs. $18.0 billion). Emerson, by contrast, has evolved into an asset-light hybrid of industrial software and intelligent devices, a profile that supports its structurally higher margins — 27.6% adjusted segment EBITA margin versus Cummins' 16.0% EBITDA margin.
Growth drivers differ sharply. Cummins is currently leveraged to the surge in data center backup power demand, a secular tailwind that has more than offset cyclical weakness in its on-highway truck markets. Emerson's growth is anchored in industrial automation, digital transformation, and process optimization, with particular strength in energy, life sciences, and semiconductor end markets. Risk factors also diverge: Cummins must navigate a heavy-duty truck cycle that is only now showing signs of bottoming, while Emerson faces regional headwinds in Europe and China that have persisted for several quarters.
From a market sentiment standpoint, Cummins has enjoyed positive momentum, with multiple analyst upgrades and a stock price near 52-week highs. Emerson, despite solid execution and margin expansion, saw its stock correct after a modest revenue miss, reflecting higher investor expectations baked into its valuation. On shareholder returns, both companies are exemplary: Cummins' 16-year dividend growth streak speaks to reliability, while Emerson's newly expanded buyback program and 5% dividend increase signal confidence in its post-transformation earnings power and free cash flow generation capacity.
Based on observable trend consistency, relative positioning, and prevailing market sentiment, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely tilt in favor of Cummins Inc. (CMI) in the current environment. The combination of record profitability in its power generation segments, a potential bottoming of the North American truck cycle, and sustained momentum from data center infrastructure spending creates a favorable convergence of cyclical recovery and secular growth. While Emerson Electric offers superior margins and an attractive automation-focused portfolio, near-term uncertainties around European and Chinese demand, softness in discrete automation, and a software renewal headwind introduce incremental caution. An AI model analyzing trend strength, earnings revision direction, and relative price momentum would likely see Cummins' risk-reward profile as marginally more compelling at this juncture. As always, this probabilistic assessment reflects current data and does not constitute a definitive prediction; market conditions evolve, and relative positioning should be re-evaluated as new information emerges.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEMR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMI (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while EMR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +4.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.22%.
CMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
EMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CMI | EMR | CMI / EMR | |
| Capitalization | 91.8B | 81.2B | 113% |
| EBITDA | 5.23B | 5.05B | 103% |
| Gain YTD | 31.132 | 10.040 | 310% |
| P/E Ratio | 34.55 | 33.54 | 103% |
| Revenue | 33.9B | 18.3B | 185% |
| Total Cash | 3.18B | 1.79B | 178% |
| Total Debt | 8.24B | 14.1B | 58% |
CMI | EMR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMR's Valuation (22) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as CMI (27) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to CMI’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (33) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's SMR Rating (41) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (64) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (59) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
CMI's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EMR (72) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that CMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than EMR’s over the last 12 months.
| CMI | EMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 54% | 17 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMI has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMI jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMR has been closely correlated with ROK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMR jumps, then ROK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMR | 100% | +3.77% | ||
| ROK - EMR | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| LECO - EMR | 69% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| AME - EMR | 68% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| KMT - EMR | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| NDSN - EMR | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||