CNH
Price
$11.87
Change
+$0.92 (+8.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
19.09B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OSK
Price
$157.09
Change
+$4.36 (+2.85%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
9.7B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNH vs OSK

CNH vs OSK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CNH Industrial (CNH) vs. Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CNH Industrial operates in agricultural and construction equipment, while Oshkosh Corporation focuses on purpose-built specialty vehicles across access, vocational, and defense segments.
  • Recent market activity shows CNH shares trading near $10–11 with year-to-date gains around 14%, influenced by upcoming second-quarter earnings and analyst positioning.
  • OSK shares have traded around $140–142 recently, supported by steady demand in its diversified vehicle portfolio amid broader industrial trends.
  • Sector exposure differs notably: CNH faces cyclical pressures from agriculture and construction markets, whereas OSK benefits from stable government and infrastructure-related contracts.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks reflects contrasting momentum drivers, with CNH showing earnings-related volatility and OSK maintaining more consistent positioning.
  • Market sentiment for both remains tied to macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and capital spending, creating trade-offs for investors seeking equipment versus specialty vehicle exposure.

Introduction

CNH Industrial (CNH) and Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) represent distinct corners of the industrial machinery sector, making their comparison relevant for traders and investors evaluating equipment manufacturers with varying end-market exposures. CNH serves global agriculture and construction customers, while OSK produces specialized vehicles for access, vocational, and defense applications. Portfolio managers and sector-focused traders may use this side-by-side analysis to assess relative performance, business model resilience, and positioning within the current market environment. The comparison highlights differences in growth drivers and risk profiles without implying directional outcomes.

CNH Overview and Recent Performance

CNH Industrial designs, manufactures, and sells agricultural machinery and construction equipment under brands such as Case IH and New Holland. The company operates globally with significant exposure to farming cycles and infrastructure spending. In recent weeks, shares have traded in a range near $10–11, posting year-to-date returns of approximately 14% amid broader market gains. Performance has been shaped by anticipation surrounding the August 3, 2026 second-quarter earnings release, with analysts projecting modest revenue and earnings figures. Sentiment has reflected positioning ahead of results, alongside ongoing industry dynamics in equipment demand. Broader time references show the stock maintaining a market capitalization around $13 billion with institutional ownership near 60%.

OSK Overview and Recent Performance

Oshkosh Corporation engineers and produces purpose-built vehicles and equipment through segments including access (such as aerial work platforms), vocational, and transport, serving commercial, municipal, and defense customers. Headquartered in Wisconsin, the company emphasizes innovation in electrification and autonomy. Recent market activity has seen shares trade near $140–142, supported by steady order flows in its diversified portfolio. Performance in recent weeks aligns with steady industrial demand and contract visibility, with first-quarter results highlighting net income contributions. Sentiment remains influenced by infrastructure and government spending trends, positioning the stock within a market capitalization exceeding $9 billion and a dividend yield around 1.6%.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of bots that actively trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested or live statistics, and suitable risk-adjusted metrics earn placement in this featured section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles, with historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics varying across the platform’s offerings. Users can review detailed metrics for each bot to identify options that match their objectives. Explore the curated list on the Trending AI Robots page for further details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CNH Industrial and Oshkosh Corporation differ fundamentally in business models: CNH concentrates on high-volume agricultural and construction machinery with exposure to commodity price cycles and seasonal demand, while OSK emphasizes customized, purpose-built vehicles with recurring revenue potential from defense and municipal contracts. Growth drivers contrast as well—CNH is tied to farm income and infrastructure outlays, whereas OSK benefits from multi-year government programs and access equipment leasing. Recent momentum shows CNH experiencing earnings-related volatility compared with OSK’s steadier trajectory amid contract visibility. Risk factors include CNH’s higher sensitivity to interest rates affecting equipment financing and OSK’s reliance on defense budget allocations. Sector exposure places both in industrials yet with limited overlap, allowing investors to balance cyclical machinery exposure against more stable specialty vehicle demand. Market sentiment reflects these distinctions, with each stock responding differently to macroeconomic signals such as capital expenditure trends.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative sector positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to OSK over CNH. This assessment draws from OSK’s diversified contract base and steadier recent performance metrics versus CNH’s nearer-term earnings sensitivity. The edge remains probabilistic and could shift with new data releases or macroeconomic developments.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CNH vs. OSK commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNH is a Hold and OSK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (CNH: $11.87 vs. OSK: $157.09)
Brand notoriety: CNH and OSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNH: 180% vs. OSK: 97%
Market capitalization -- CNH: $19.09B vs. OSK: $9.7B
CNH [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $19.09B. OSK’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $9.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $380.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $26.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNH is a better buy in the long-term than OSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNH is a better buy in the short-term than OSK.

Price Growth

CNH (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +13.70% price change this week, while OSK (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +2.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNH is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

OSK is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+1.40% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNH($19.1B) has a higher market cap than OSK($9.7B). CNH has higher P/E ratio than OSK: CNH (47.48) vs OSK (17.99). CNH YTD gains are higher at: 29.985 vs. OSK (26.482). CNH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.6B vs. OSK (1.05B). OSK has less debt than CNH: OSK (1.1B) vs CNH (26.2B). CNH has higher revenues than OSK: CNH (18.1B) vs OSK (10.6B).
CNHOSKCNH / OSK
Capitalization19.1B9.7B197%
EBITDA2.6B1.05B247%
Gain YTD29.98526.482113%
P/E Ratio47.4817.99264%
Revenue18.1B10.6B171%
Total Cash1.6BN/A-
Total Debt26.2B1.1B2,375%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNH vs OSK: Fundamental Ratings
CNH
OSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
8463
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNH's Valuation (32) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as OSK (63). This means that CNH’s stock grew similarly to OSK’s over the last 12 months.

OSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNH (100). This means that OSK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNH’s over the last 12 months.

OSK's SMR Rating (63) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (84). This means that OSK’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.

OSK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as CNH (48). This means that OSK’s stock grew similarly to CNH’s over the last 12 months.

CNH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as OSK (23). This means that CNH’s stock grew similarly to OSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNHOSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLCO5.490.14
+2.62%
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
LSAK4.600.04
+0.88%
Lesaka Technologies
AACOU10.05N/A
N/A
Abony Acquisition Corporation I
MUSA569.72-0.48
-0.08%
Murphy USA
CLNN4.32-0.05
-1.14%
Clene Inc.

CNH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNH has been closely correlated with AGCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNH jumps, then AGCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNH
1D Price
Change %
CNH100%
+8.40%
AGCO - CNH
77%
Closely correlated
+2.68%
DE - CNH
72%
Closely correlated
+4.27%
OSK - CNH
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
TEX - CNH
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
PCAR - CNH
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More

OSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSK has been closely correlated with TEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OSK jumps, then TEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OSK
1D Price
Change %
OSK100%
+2.85%
TEX - OSK
67%
Closely correlated
+3.55%
CNH - OSK
63%
Loosely correlated
+8.40%
AGCO - OSK
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
MTW - OSK
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
PCAR - OSK
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More