CPAC
Price
$11.80
Change
-$0.01 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CRH
Price
$95.01
Change
-$0.99 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
63.21B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs CRH

CPAC vs CRH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. CRH commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a Buy and CRH is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CPAC: $11.80 vs. CRH: $95.01)
Brand notoriety: CPAC and CRH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 37% vs. CRH: 166%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $1.01B vs. CRH: $63.21B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $1.01B. CRH’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $63.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $63.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the long-term than CRH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the short-term than CRH.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while CRH (@Construction Materials) price change was -4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.76% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($63.2B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($1.01B). CRH (16.79) and CPAC (16.35) have similar P/E ratio . CPAC YTD gains are higher at: 13.244 vs. CRH (-23.324). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.26B vs. CPAC (604M). CRH has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. CPAC (199M). CPAC has less debt than CRH: CPAC (1.39B) vs CRH (19.8B). CRH has higher revenues than CPAC: CRH (38.6B) vs CPAC (2.25B).
CPACCRHCPAC / CRH
Capitalization1.01B63.2B2%
EBITDA604M8.26B7%
Gain YTD13.244-23.324-57%
P/E Ratio16.3516.7997%
Revenue2.25B38.6B6%
Total Cash199M3.03B7%
Total Debt1.39B19.8B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs CRH: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
CRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
711
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
335
SMR RATING
1..100
5554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1270
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (24). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (35). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CRH's SMR Rating (54) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (55). This means that CRH’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CRH (63). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CRH’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRH (70). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACCRH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEUCX58.630.38
+0.65%
American Funds EUPAC 529-C
GMICX22.40N/A
N/A
GMO International Equity II
FLKSX18.00-0.06
-0.33%
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K6
GIDAX9.60-0.08
-0.83%
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem A
DRDIX25.09-0.33
-1.30%
Dearborn Partners Rising Dividend I

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and JHX have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and JHX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
-0.08%
JHX - CPAC
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
RETO - CPAC
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.85%
EXP - CPAC
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
CRH - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
CX - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
-1.03%
MLM - CRH
72%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
VMC - CRH
70%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TTAM - CRH
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
EXP - CRH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
BCC - CRH
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More