It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CPB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -5.35% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.87%.
CPB is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
CPB | MDLZ | CPB / MDLZ | |
Capitalization | 13.3B | 94.3B | 14% |
EBITDA | 1.61B | 7.65B | 21% |
Gain YTD | 5.726 | -6.413 | -89% |
P/E Ratio | 17.51 | 19.27 | 91% |
Revenue | 9.27B | 36B | 26% |
Total Cash | 169M | 1.81B | 9% |
Total Debt | 4.52B | 19.9B | 23% |
CPB | MDLZ | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPB's Valuation (26) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (41). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPB (77). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPB’s over the last 12 months.
CPB's SMR Rating (48) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (60). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CPB's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (61). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CPB's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MDLZ (53). This means that CPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
CPB | MDLZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago59% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago42% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago40% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago49% | 29 days ago52% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 7 days ago43% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago40% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TROY.X | 0.004840 | 0.000248 | +5.39% |
TROY cryptocurrency | |||
OSMO.X | 0.495505 | -0.024405 | -4.69% |
Osmosis cryptocurrency | |||
AAVE.X | 180.034350 | -14.294586 | -7.36% |
Aave cryptocurrency | |||
TRU.X | 0.090180 | -0.010487 | -10.42% |
TrueFi cryptocurrency | |||
EPX.X | 0.000035 | -0.000004 | -11.10% |
Ellipsis cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPB has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CPB jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MDLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ | 100% | +0.64% | ||
GIS - MDLZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.25% | ||
KHC - MDLZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
HSY - MDLZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
CAG - MDLZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
FLO - MDLZ | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.65% | ||
More |