This comparison examines CPRT and ULTA to highlight differences in business models, recent market behavior, and positioning within their respective sectors. Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services, while Ulta Beauty, Inc. operates as a specialty retailer of beauty products and services. Investors and traders seeking exposure to distinct cyclical and consumer discretionary themes may find the analysis relevant when evaluating portfolio diversification or relative value opportunities in the current environment.
Copart, Inc. manages an online platform for salvage and used vehicle auctions, serving insurance carriers, dealers, and other clients. In recent market activity, shares have rebounded sharply from 52-week lows near $26.81, advancing approximately 23-24% over the past 30 days to trade around $33-34. Key influences include the return of founder Jay Adair as chief executive officer effective July 31, 2026, following the departure of the prior CEO, along with indications of plans to deploy substantial cash reserves toward acquisitions. Fiscal third-quarter 2026 results showed revenue of $1.24 billion, up 2.1% year over year. Reports of preliminary talks to acquire insurance software provider CCC Intelligent Solutions have further supported sentiment, though volumes in the salvage segment remain under pressure from industry dynamics.
Ulta Beauty, Inc. operates a network of beauty retail stores and an e-commerce platform offering cosmetics, skincare, haircare, and related services. In recent market activity, the stock has posted more measured gains, trading in the $500-520 range after earlier declines from a 52-week high near $715. Performance has been supported by board refreshment, including the appointment of a specialty retail executive effective August 31, 2026, and prior quarterly results that exceeded expectations with double-digit sales growth. The company continues to execute on its omnichannel strategy and product mix optimization, though it faces headwinds from the termination of a partnership with Target and broader retail environment pressures. Year-to-date returns remain negative, reflecting investor caution on discretionary spending trends.
Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. The platform offers hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions and robust statistical profiles are featured in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a wide range of annualized returns, often spanning 60% to over 200% in documented cases, with win rates commonly between 55% and 67% and profit factors exceeding 2.0 in top performers. Each bot employs distinct trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and ticker selections. Review the live performance metrics on the Trending AI Robots page to identify suitable options for individual objectives.
CPRT and ULTA differ markedly in business models: the former centers on B2B vehicle remarketing with high operating leverage and a debt-light balance sheet, while the latter focuses on consumer retail with exposure to fashion and beauty cycles. Growth drivers for CPRT include potential M&A activity and cash deployment, whereas ULTA emphasizes store expansion, digital channels, and brand partnerships. Recent momentum has favored CPRT due to its sharper rebound and leadership catalyst, contrasted with ULTA's steadier but less pronounced recovery. Risk factors for CPRT center on auction volume variability and insurance market share shifts; for ULTA, they include competitive intensity and macroeconomic sensitivity in consumer spending. Sector exposure places CPRT in commercial services and ULTA in specialty retail, producing divergent correlations to economic indicators and market sentiment.
Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency, catalyst visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CPRT. The stock’s pronounced rebound, supported by leadership continuity and acquisition-related developments, aligns more closely with near-term momentum signals than ULTA’s comparatively stable but less accelerated trajectory amid retail headwinds. This assessment reflects pattern recognition across multiple timeframes rather than a definitive forecast.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsIt is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileULTA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULTA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CPRT (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while ULTA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.39%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.50%.
CPRT is expected to report earnings on Sep 10, 2026.
ULTA is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Specialty Stores (-3.53% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CPRT | ULTA | CPRT / ULTA | |
| Capitalization | 29.7B | 23.2B | 128% |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | 1.94B | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -18.186 | -10.438 | 174% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.89 | 19.73 | 101% |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 13B | 36% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 213M | 1,972% |
| Total Debt | 93.1M | 2.52B | 4% |
CPRT | ULTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 42 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPRT's Valuation (80) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as ULTA (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew similarly to ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's SMR Rating (23) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CPRT (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CPRT (54) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPRT | ULTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 7 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 76% |