This comparison examines CPRT and ULTA, two established companies operating in distinct sectors. Copart provides an online marketplace for salvage and used vehicles, primarily serving insurance carriers and dealers, while Ulta Beauty operates as a specialty retailer of beauty products with a network of stores and e-commerce platforms. The analysis focuses on recent market activity, earnings developments, and positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating relative performance, sector exposure, and momentum in a dynamic economic setting.
Copart, Inc. operates a global online auction platform for vehicles, connecting sellers such as insurers with buyers including dismantlers and dealers. In recent market activity, the company delivered fiscal third-quarter 2026 results on May 21, 2026, posting revenue of $1.24 billion, a 2.1% increase year-over-year that exceeded analyst expectations. Earnings per share reached $0.43, surpassing the consensus estimate of $0.41. Factors influencing performance included higher average selling prices and contributions from international operations, partially offset by softer U.S. insurance unit volumes. The stock has experienced notable volatility over the past year, trading in the low $30s range amid broader market gains, reflecting sensitivity to insurance industry dynamics and total-loss frequency trends.
Ulta Beauty, Inc. manages a network of beauty retail stores combined with strong digital sales channels, offering cosmetics, skincare, and related products. Recent market activity shows the company preparing for its fiscal first-quarter 2026 earnings release on June 2, 2026, with consensus estimates calling for revenue near $3.08 billion and EPS of $6.87. Prior-quarter results demonstrated solid top-line growth supported by comparable sales increases and new store contributions. Share repurchase activity and brand partnerships have contributed to operational momentum. The stock has traded around the $500 level in recent sessions, with year-to-date gains outpacing the broader market at times, though subject to fluctuations tied to consumer discretionary spending patterns.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading systems from hundreds of AI trading bots available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions and statistical robustness earn placement in the trending section. Available bots display a range of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that can assist users in evaluating suitability. The platform emphasizes diversification through multiple approaches rather than a single methodology. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed performance data and configuration options.
Copart (CPRT) and Ulta Beauty (ULTA) differ significantly in business models, with CPRT centered on B2B auction services in the automotive salvage sector and ULTA focused on direct-to-consumer retail in beauty and personal care. Growth drivers for CPRT include rising total-loss frequency and pricing power, while ULTA benefits from comparable sales expansion and omnichannel capabilities. Recent momentum shows CPRT delivering an earnings beat in May 2026 despite volume softness, contrasted with ULTA’s upcoming report amid analyst expectations for continued revenue growth. Risk factors encompass insurance claim variability for CPRT and shifts in discretionary consumer spending for ULTA. Sector exposure places CPRT in industrials and ULTA in consumer discretionary, leading to distinct sensitivities in market sentiment and economic cycles.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term momentum to CPRT following its May 2026 beat and supporting price dynamics. ULTA maintains solid fundamentals ahead of its June report, though the absence of fresh data introduces greater uncertainty in trend assessment. The evaluation prioritizes demonstrated stability and catalyst alignment over longer-term forecasts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPRT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileULTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPRT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULTA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CPRT (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while ULTA (@Specialty Stores) price change was -3.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.82%.
CPRT is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.
ULTA is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
@Specialty Stores (+2.31% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| CPRT | ULTA | CPRT / ULTA | |
| Capitalization | 29B | 20.5B | 141% |
| EBITDA | 1.92B | 1.91B | 101% |
| Gain YTD | -20.026 | -21.010 | 95% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.45 | 17.91 | 109% |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 12.7B | 37% |
| Total Cash | 4.2B | 221M | 1,900% |
| Total Debt | 93.1M | 2.3B | 4% |
CPRT | ULTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPRT's Valuation (86) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as ULTA (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CPRT’s stock grew similarly to ULTA’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's SMR Rating (100) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CPRT (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as CPRT (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew similarly to CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
ULTA's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPRT (89) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that ULTA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPRT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPRT | ULTA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 16 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPRT has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPRT jumps, then FND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPRT | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| FND - CPRT | 64% Loosely correlated | +8.30% | ||
| WSM - CPRT | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.27% | ||
| RH - CPRT | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| HD - CPRT | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| LOW - CPRT | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULTA has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULTA jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULTA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULTA | 100% | +3.26% | ||
| HNST - ULTA | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| AN - ULTA | 46% Loosely correlated | +4.93% | ||
| CPRT - ULTA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| LOW - ULTA | 42% Loosely correlated | +4.52% | ||
| ABG - ULTA | 42% Loosely correlated | +3.92% | ||
More | ||||