Advertisement
CRGY vs SU
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) vs. Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CRGY and SU have posted robust year-to-date gains of approximately 62% and 53%, respectively, reflecting strong energy sector momentum.
- CRGY, a U.S.-focused exploration and production (E&P) company, offers higher growth potential through acquisitions but carries elevated debt levels.
- SU, a larger integrated Canadian energy firm, provides diversification across upstream, refining, and marketing, contributing to superior one-year returns of 93%.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks maintaining stability, with SU breaking above its 20-day moving average and CRGY gaining amid broader dips.
- Upcoming Q1 earnings reports for both could drive sentiment shifts, with analysts anticipating beats.
- Tickeron AI analysis favors SU for its trend consistency and operational balance.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits CRGY, a nimble U.S. oil and gas producer, against SU, a diversified Canadian energy giant. Both operate in the volatile energy sector, where crude oil prices and production dynamics shape performance. Traders seeking exposure to upstream growth may eye CRGY, while investors favoring stability and integrated operations might prefer SU. Amid recent commodity fluctuations and geopolitical tensions, this analysis highlights relative performance, business models, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current environment.
CRGY Overview and Recent Performance
Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) is an independent energy firm engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids, primarily in the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta basins. In recent months, the stock has demonstrated resilience, trading around $13.46 with year-to-date gains exceeding 62% and one-year returns near 67%. Sentiment has been buoyed by positive analyst coverage, expectations of earnings beats, and operational updates highlighting acquisition-driven growth. Recent weeks have seen modest monthly appreciation of about 2%, even as the stock ascended during broader market pullbacks, underscoring investor confidence in its returns-focused strategy amid favorable oil prices.
SU Overview and Recent Performance
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU) functions as an integrated energy company with operations spanning oil sands production, offshore exploration, refining, and marketing across Canada, the U.S., and internationally. The stock, recently at $67.55, has delivered year-to-date returns of around 53% and impressive one-year gains of 93%, outperforming peers in longer horizons. Key influences include record output from oil sands, robust refining margins, and upward analyst revisions, such as Goldman Sachs' raised price target. In recent market activity, SU has shown strength, with monthly gains near 2% and a breakout above its 20-day moving average, reflecting sustained positive momentum tied to operational efficiencies and sector tailwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from over 350 agents that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots employ neural networks for pattern recognition, delivering real-time signals with metrics like annualized returns up to 163%, win rates ranging from 51% to 88%, profit factors of 1.5 to 7+, and trade durations from minutes to weeks. For instance, energy-focused bots have achieved +76% annualized gains with 57% win rates. Only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn a spot, adapting to volatility in sectors like energy. Explore these high-potential tools to enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRGY emphasizes upstream E&P with a returns-driven acquisition model in key U.S. basins, contrasting SU's integrated approach blending oil sands mining, offshore assets, and downstream refining for revenue diversification. Growth drivers differ: CRGY leverages M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for scale, while SU benefits from production records and marketing synergies. Recent momentum favors SU with stronger one-year returns, though CRGY edges YTD. Risk profiles highlight trade-offs—CRGY's higher debt-to-equity ratio (107%) amplifies commodity sensitivity, versus SU's balanced exposure mitigating volatility. Market sentiment remains upbeat for both, fueled by oil demand and analyst optimism, but SU's scale offers relative stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward SU in this matchup, citing its superior one-year trend consistency, integrated business model for risk mitigation, robust cash flows, and favorable catalysts like refining margins and oil sands output. While CRGY shows promising growth, SU exhibits higher probability of sustained outperformance in the near term based on relative positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGY is a Hold and SU is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CRGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- SU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CRGY (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.35% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.88%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
SU is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+0.22% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
@Integrated Oil (-0.04% weekly)Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| CRGY | SU | CRGY / SU | |
| Capitalization | 3.82B | 72.7B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 1.26B | 16.2B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | 40.731 | 38.864 | 105% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.39 | 16.33 | 155% |
| Revenue | 3.81B | 54.5B | 7% |
| Total Cash | 9.78M | 3.27B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5.37B | 14.8B | 36% |
SU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRGY | SU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 27 days ago 78% | 12 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FGM | 64.35 | 0.77 | +1.21% |
| First Trust Germany AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| DFIS | 36.22 | 0.21 | +0.57% |
| Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | |||
| FFA | 22.42 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund | |||
| MAXJ | 29.03 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF | |||
| XLCI | 23.81 | -0.12 | -0.50% |
| State Street® CommServSelSectSPDR®PrmETF | |||
CRGY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRGY has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRGY jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRGY | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| CHRD - CRGY | 82% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| MGY - CRGY | 81% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| OVV - CRGY | 80% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| NOG - CRGY | 80% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| PR - CRGY | 79% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||
SU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.